Wish it could be done...but I think that the Hornets got JJ to help win some games...even as bad as their record is at the moment. It would take something very off the wall and miraculous for us to get JJ back...as much as us Kings fans would love to see it.VF21 said:I'm thinking they'd let JJ go dirt cheap... It's times like this when I absolutely HATE the CBA!!!
NBA.com said:Detroit acquired two-time All-Star Rasheed Wallace on Thursday, Feb. 19, in a three-team deal that sent Chucky Atkins and Lindsey Hunter to Boston and Bob Sura, Zeljko Rebraca and Chris Mills to Atlanta. Detroit also landed Mike James and parted with two first-round picks.
You're missing the point.Circa_1985_Fan said:Wish it could be done...but I think that the Hornets got JJ to help win some games...even as bad as their record is at the moment. It would take something very off the wall and miraculous for us to get JJ back...as much as us Kings fans would love to see it.
http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm#84You can't trade a player-
For two months after receiving the player in trade, if the player is being traded in combination with other players. However, the team is free to trade the player by himself (not packaged with other players) immediately. This two-month restriction applies only to teams over the salary cap
So, the team acquiring the player can send multiple players/draft picks, as long as they don't get multiple players/draft picks in return?Kingsgurl said:Teams involved were under the cap and not bound by the exception rules? Ah HA! Wallace was traded by HIMSELF, not packaged with others. The other players came from the other teams, no restrictions on that.
I wonder if other teams are trying to send their lesser players. It may raise the ante.Mr. S£im Citrus said:That so? Well then, let's trade him for Daniels and draft picks; I mean, if the Hornets' backs are really against the wall...
If we can't get him for Daniels and picks, we should step away from the bargaining table; I didn't want to see us sacrifice Wallace's potential to keep Jackson last time (even though it turned out to make no difference, since Adelman wouldn't play Wallace), and I don't want to see us sacrifice our future (Martin, Evans, Barnes) to get him back.Heuge said:I wonder if other teams are trying to send their lesser players. It may raise the ante.
Word.Mr. S£im Citrus said:If we can't get him for Daniels and picks, we should step away from the bargaining table; I didn't want to see us sacrifice Wallace's potential to keep Jackson last time (even though it turned out to make no difference, since Adelman wouldn't play Wallace), and I don't want to see us sacrifice our future (Martin, Evans, Barnes) to get him back.
Martin, Evans...no...Barnes...maybe.Mr. S£im Citrus said:If we can't get him for Daniels and picks, we should step away from the bargaining table; I didn't want to see us sacrifice Wallace's potential to keep Jackson last time (even though it turned out to make no difference, since Adelman wouldn't play Wallace), and I don't want to see us sacrifice our future (Martin, Evans, Barnes) to get him back.
Agreed.Mr. S£im Citrus said:If we can't get him for Daniels and picks, we should step away from the bargaining table; I didn't want to see us sacrifice Wallace's potential to keep Jackson last time (even though it turned out to make no difference, since Adelman wouldn't play Wallace), and I don't want to see us sacrifice our future (Martin, Evans, Barnes) to get him back.
Barnes = no as well. Not worth giving up a guy who should, at worst, be a solid bench player for years for an aging journeyman who might have two good years left in him, but probably doesn't.Heuge said:Martin, Evans...no...Barnes...maybe.
Is Daniels our future? Honestly, I thought he was competing with Kevin for the 12th man spot.OHSacFan said:So Barnes is in a slump right now. Give him time.
But how can you talk about trading Daniels and Kevin??? Give them a chance! From what I've been told from die-hard fans, Adelman doesn't play his rookies that much. I don't understand why you would want to trade your future (as Mr. Slim so adequately put it).
He hasn't even played!HndsmCelt said:The BEST offer would include Evans, Jackson if he were healthy (although I am not sure that trading Jackson for JJ makes any snse at all) I would however trade Daniels, and even Evans... nothing persoanl but I am not sure taht Flash has any value over pics at this stage.
Unfortuneatly, in sports, the future is now.OHSacFan said:So Barnes is in a slump right now. Give him time.
But how can you talk about trading Daniels and Kevin??? Give them a chance! From what I've been told from die-hard fans, Adelman doesn't play his rookies that much. I don't understand why you would want to trade your future (as Mr. Slim so adequately put it).
Bingo. Patience, my friends, that boy is going to knock our socks off in the not so distant futureMr. S£im Citrus said:He hasn't even played!