Power Balance likely to bow out as Sacramento Kings arena sponsor

"Cash-starved Power Balance expects to be sold soon, and court papers say the likely buyer doesn't plan to maintain the marketing deal that turned the former Arco Arena into Power Balance Pavilion."

http://www.sacbee.com/2011/12/06/4102319/power-balance-likely-to-bow-out.html

Probably better for the Kings really, although you have to imagine the looming are they staying or are they going questions and fact the arena wil be knocked down within 3 years either way will have to depress the asking price for a new sponsor.
 
Probably better for the Kings really, although you have to imagine the looming are they staying or are they going questions and fact the arena wil be knocked down within 3 years either way will have to depress the asking price for a new sponsor.


And...the NIMBY's and CAVE people have already loaded up the commenr section with the same BS they've been preaching since 1947. Smh
 
Kind of interesting how several in local media (mainly at TV/radio stations) have now started refering to arena as "The Natomas Arena." I wonder what name if any will be painted on the court to replace "Power Balance Arena" if there's no new sponsor when Kings start playing games this season on their home floor.
 
Was just talking about this yesterday with a buddy. Once this PBP thing goes down, the Maloofs should just call it MSE Arena (Maloof Sports Entertainment Arena).

They can also TRY selling the naming rights to the Palms at a discount, but of course David Stern won't have it.
 
Was just talking about this yesterday with a buddy. Once this PBP thing goes down, the Maloofs should just call it MSE Arena (Maloof Sports Entertainment Arena).

They can also TRY selling the naming rights to the Palms at a discount, but of course David Stern won't have it.

Doesn't do them any ood financially though. That's all naming rights are, just another revenue stream.
 
It seems like we're three months away from it either being,

"The old arena" or

"Sacramento didn't fund a new arena, so now you are stuck owning this one. Good luck with your general fund" arena

I think that issue really helps the odds of this passing. Everybody with a vote has to be worried about this. None of the yes people are going to bring it up. And I don't think the no votes will either because they also failed to protect us from this issue.

Either way, the city is probably going to buy an arena. Just depends whether they get new or a dump.
 
I don't think this arena being potentially knocked down in a few years would matter as far as a sponsor goes. The deal would just have to cover the name being transitioned to the new arena, and since the Maloofs wouldn't own it, KJ would have to be brought into negotiate that part. I don't see why the City would say, "Oh, you sponsored that old Arena, we want a new name." It's a built in consistent revenue stream that could be carried over right into the City's pockets.
 
It is more likely that the new sponsor won't want to be associated with the old building period than anything else. Who wants their name on a dump? I was never too bothered by Power Balance solely because I figured it was the best deal we were going to get. So up next will be something of similar stature or a season or two of a no-name arena.
 
It seems like we're three months away from it either being,

"The old arena" or

"Sacramento didn't fund a new arena, so now you are stuck owning this one. Good luck with your general fund" arena

This says it all right here. I'll be more than happy to mention that during the Dec 13th city council meeting.
 
Doesn't do them any ood financially though. That's all naming rights are, just another revenue stream.

I said what I said under the assumption that the Maloofs cannot find any new sponsor to pay for the naming rights. This scenario is very likely as it is a shorten season with uncertainties regarding a new arena.
 
I said what I said under the assumption that the Maloofs cannot find any new sponsor to pay for the naming rights. This scenario is very likely as it is a shorten season with uncertainties regarding a new arena.

On the other hand, if the arena goes forward as of March 1 (or earlier) there will likely be an early-bird bidding war for naming rights on the new one, and I wouldn't be surprised to see it carry back to the current arena with a different "name" from the same company. For instance, if Intel were to buy the rights, they might name the current arena "Pentium Place" and reserve "The Intel Railyards" for the new arena. Something like that.
 
I said what I said under the assumption that the Maloofs cannot find any new sponsor to pay for the naming rights. This scenario is very likely as it is a shorten season with uncertainties regarding a new arena.

But the arena is used year round not just for the NBA. Plus, it still will need naming right for 3 more years.
 
On the other hand, if the arena goes forward as of March 1 (or earlier) there will likely be an early-bird bidding war for naming rights on the new one, and I wouldn't be surprised to see it carry back to the current arena with a different "name" from the same company. For instance, if Intel were to buy the rights, they might name the current arena "Pentium Place" and reserve "The Intel Railyards" for the new arena. Something like that.

Possible but tricky as the Maloofs will own one arena and the city will own the other. A good idea, but one of the many issues that will come up with Arco and it's debt as the City tried to hammer out a deal with the NBA (maybe the Maloofs, but I think Stern has pushed them firmly into the back seat.)
 
On the other hand, if the arena goes forward as of March 1 (or earlier) there will likely be an early-bird bidding war for naming rights on the new one, and I wouldn't be surprised to see it carry back to the current arena with a different "name" from the same company. For instance, if Intel were to buy the rights, they might name the current arena "Pentium Place" and reserve "The Intel Railyards" for the new arena. Something like that.
Anything is possible, but wouldn't MSE be negotiating rights for what used to be Arco vs. the city negotiating rights for the new building? All with very different interests in mind as well - offsetting their financial woes for the former and the actual finance of the arena for the latter.

I truly expect if the former Arco gets another name it will be another dodgy company trying to make a big splash with a bargain naming deal.
 
But the arena is used year round not just for the NBA. Plus, it still will need naming right for 3 more years.

This is an important point - any new arena will still be 3 years or so down the road. You can always include an adjustment clause in your contract for whether the Kings stay or go as well.
 
Possible but tricky as the Maloofs will own one arena and the city will own the other. A good idea, but one of the many issues that will come up with Arco and it's debt as the City tried to hammer out a deal with the NBA (maybe the Maloofs, but I think Stern has pushed them firmly into the back seat.)

Yep, you and PDX are right. I didn't think that through. That does make the prospects of a new naming rights deal for the PBP a bit more iffy.
 
Back
Top