Potential clippers owners

Turgenev

Starter
Maybe am getting ahead of myself but this is sort of interesting.

http://www.latimes.com/sports/baske...w-owner-20140430,0,753070.story#axzz30RWU7WXz

Floyd Mayweather Jr. — The boxer said he would like to put together a group to make an offer and was "very, very interested in buying the Clippers."

Preparing for Saturday night's fight against Marcos Maidana in Las Vegas, Mayweather said that "it's not just talk" about acquiring the club. "I want to do it."

I don't know how seriously the Mayweather bid could be taken given his previous comments about Manny Pacquiao and also his gambling hobby.
 
So another potential owner is another well known racist? Mayweather himself released these racist comments unlike Sterling who was exposed by a gold digger.
 
So another potential owner is another well known racist? Mayweather himself released these racist comments unlike Sterling who was exposed by a gold digger.

They will never let Mayweather own this franchise. All they have to do is look at all of his racist youtube and twitter rants. He's been a racist to almost every ethnicity publically.
 
Why is the Sterling thread locked? This belong in there. This situation isn't resolved.



Donald Sterling won’t go down without a fight, according to an NBA executive who is close to the disgraced owner of the Clippers, and will sue the league if the other 29 owners vote to force him to sell.

The wheels are in motion to remove Sterling, a process that the executive said Wednesday night would lead to a lawsuit by the disgraced owner, possibly tying up the future of the team for years.

“He is not going to sell the team,” the executive said.




Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/b...ippers-source-article-1.1774769#ixzz30V1QLwAu
 
If Sterling is removed and the new owner installed, what are the consequences going to be on the personnel of the organization? Is the new owner going to clean house, a la Vivek? If so, wouldn't that be the injustice of injustices - people having nothing to do with Sterling's racism getting robbed of their jobs because of the offended sensibilities of others. I wonder what Silver would say to that?
 
I had it at 1.7 ish... 2 bill is higher than I thought it would go... but it doesn't surprise me in the least. Especially considering who's bidding. This only adds to the Kings/Clippers rivalry. The owners (Ballmer, Vivek) were in a dogfight only a year ago!

No kidding! Especially this:

It was Ballmer who pushed behind the scenes for Hansen to keep raising the offer for the Kings when it became a bidding war with Ranadive last spring, sources said. Ballmer was a factor in Hansen secretly funneling money to a political action committee in Sacramento aimed at defeating the arena deal through a ballot measure


Boo this man!
 
Seattle seems pretty pissed off too (which is good) because they just lost their golden goose to Los Angeles. Hansen cannot do it alone!

Seattle is a very good market, but their politicians suck and the NBA holds grudges.
 
Vivek made out like a bandit on the Clippers deal. The value of the Kings just went from 575mil to a billion with that one purchase.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lwc
Vivek made out like a bandit on the Clippers deal. The value of the Kings just went from 575mil to a billion with that one purchase.

Pretty much. Yup. Maybe not all teams made that jump in value, but the California teams definitely got a shot in the arm.

Just think about it like this: if Vivek put the Kings up for sale RIGHT NOW... where would the bidding start? I'd have to think at LEAST 800 mil. It's partly due to the fact that there are a lot of new owners and the opportunity to buy a franchise in the near to medium term future is very slim.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lwc
Seattle seems pretty pissed off too (which is good) because they just lost their golden goose to Los Angeles. Hansen cannot do it alone!

Seattle is a very good market, but their politicians suck and the NBA holds grudges.
I would NOT be surprised to see Balmer move the team to Seattle in 3-5 years.
 
I would NOT be surprised to see Balmer move the team to Seattle in 3-5 years.

I was thinking the same thing, but remember that it has to be voted on. And remember that they have to prove that the market no longer supports the team and that the arena isn't viable for future use. Those two items would be impossible to get around at this point.
 
Pretty much. Yup. Maybe not all teams made that jump in value, but the California teams definitely got a shot in the arm.

Just think about it like this: if Vivek put the Kings up for sale RIGHT NOW... where would the bidding start? I'd have to think at LEAST 800 mil. It's partly due to the fact that there are a lot of new owners and the opportunity to buy a franchise in the near to medium term future is very slim.

I don't know. The size of the LA market really can't be overstated. The Bucks sold for, what, $550 million?

That said, the price definitely isn't going down. I'm sure Vivek and co are very happy with their investment so far.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lwc
I don't think the team is worth $2 bil but that's not for me to say. My guess, though, is that the team is not worth $2 bil if it leaves LA. Would the Lakers be worth $2 bil if they moved to Seattle. I doubt it. Much of the value of a team is dependent on the media contracts, etc.
 
I was thinking the same thing, but remember that it has to be voted on. And remember that they have to prove that the market no longer supports the team and that the arena isn't viable for future use. Those two items would be impossible to get around at this point.
But is was Sterling himself that moved the team to LA after the NBA voted no on the move. It did not endear him to anyone but there were no real repercussions. I am not sure why any owners would oppose moving LA's second team, especially if it makes financial sense, which it may not for Balmer... but IF he decides to move the team after a few more seasons in LA I doubt he will meet much resistance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lwc
But is was Sterling himself that moved the team to LA after the NBA voted no on the move. It did not endear him to anyone but there were no real repercussions. I am not sure why any owners would oppose moving LA's second team, especially if it makes financial sense, which it may not for Balmer... but IF he decides to move the team after a few more seasons in LA I doubt he will meet much resistance.

IIRC they rewrote some of the rules about teams moving after the Clippers moved to LA but my google-fu is not strong this morning. I may be incorrect on this.
 
I always thought no chance the team moves for a sale over a billion, at that point you are buying the market. It is still the Lakers market and it will take decades to overcome that, not one superstar tandem on a 5-8 year run.
 
yeah but the owner is worth 20b. drop in the bucket for him. i mean, what are you really going to do with all that $$. you can't take it with you to the grave.
 
Back
Top