Our #8 for Phoenix's #14 & #18

  • Thread starter Thread starter SacKings2002NBAChampions
  • Start date Start date
S

SacKings2002NBAChampions

Guest
We could get any one of these prospects (below) and possibly Adreian Payne, Rodney Hood, Dario Saric, or Jusuf Nurkic if they fall to us.

14. SUNS, Nik Stauskas, Michigan, SG, 6-6, 205


Phoenix already has a nice backcourt with Eric Bledsoe and Goran Dragic, but Stauskas is more of a prototype shooting guard who can also handle the ball. He shot 47 percent overall, 44.2 percent on 3s, packed a lot of experience in pressure situations into two college seasons -- the Big Ten Player of the Year checks a lot of boxes.



15: HAWKS, Gary Harris, Michigan St., SG, 6-4, 210

Harris' stock took a slight hit as a shooting guard who went from 45.6 percent from the field as a freshman to 42.9 in 2013-14 and from 41.1 percent on 3s to 35.2. He has good strength and can get to the rim, even though a little undersized.



16. BULLS, Tyler Ennis, Syracuse, PG, 6-2, 180

This is too low for the best true point guard available, though without physical wow factor of Exum or Smart, but it's tough to find a team with a pressing point guard need around 10 to 14 if the Magic choose Exum near the top. Ennis won over front offices and went from prospect for the future to the immediate impact of one of the best freshmen in the country with steady play and composure beyond his years.



17. CELTICS, P.J. Hairston, D-League, SG, 6-4, 220

Hairston finished his season with the Texas Legends at 21.8 points and 32.3 minutes in 26 games, reinforcing his standing as a first-rounder who can score from the perimeter or go hard to the rim. Teams will look hard at his background after being suspended by the NCAA, in part over some acquaintances.



18. SUNS, Clint Capela, Switzerland, PF, 6-10, 210

He moved well into the first round with good showings in France, then pushed into lottery contention by flashing mobility to go with the size and toughness inside. Phoenix does not want three rookies on the roster. A nice prospect who could spend another season overseas is an ideal outcome here.



19. BULLS, Kyle Anderson, UCLA, SF, 6-9, 230

He can handle the ball for a forward, is versatile, has good size and a nice feel for the game. A lack of athleticism that will hurt his ability to create and defend, though, and some teams see the possible future role as a point forward oversold because NBA defenses will take away a lot of what made him effective in college.



20. RAPTORS, Zach LaVine, UCLA, PG-SG, 6-5, 180

The chance to let LaVine develop behind Lowry is worth strong consideration amid questions from teams whether he is a true point guard. UCLA didn't play him there last season, but LaVine, an electric athlete, insists that is his true position. If he proves it, there is a real big upside.



21. THUNDER, T.J. Warren, North Carolina St., SF, 6-8, 225

For depth, because Oklahoma City seems to be in decent shape at small forward. Without any consistent 3-point range, Warren can score in bunches, has nice instincts and does damage on the boards.



22. GRIZZLIES, James Young, Kentucky, SF, 6-7, 210

Though he doesn't have ideal athleticism, Young will be a nice scoring addition for any team. Memphis in particular can use the points, and especially from the perimeter. Playing when defenses have to pay so much attention to Marc Gasol and Zach Randolph inside would be a good way to break into the league.



23. JAZZ, K.J. McDaniels, Clemson, SF, 6-6, 198

Hall of Fame coach Larry Brown called him a human stat sheet. McDaniels scores, rebounds and blocks shots as a mega-athlete who will be able to use those physical gifts to overcome the size disadvantage waiting for him in the frontcourt in the pros.



24. HORNETS, Vasilije Micic, Serbia, PG, 6-4, 190

While he won't beat many people off the dribble, a potential problem, Micic is a pass-first point guard with vision, size and the ability to deliver the ball at the right time and place. He would be a nice complement off the bench to the smaller, quicker Kemba Walker.



25. ROCKETS, Jerami Grant, Syracuse, SF, 6-8, 210

Harvey's son/Horace's nephew, a reserve for the Orangemen, scores, rebounds and has the kind of wingspan and athleticism that indicates he could become a standout defender.



26. HEAT, Elfrid Payton, La. Lafayette, PG, 6-4, 185

Payton has good size, ball skills, defends and experience with the United States under-19 national team last summer. He didn't face top competition much in 2013-14, and when he did: 6-for-19 against Baylor, 3-for-11 against Louisville, 9-for-20 against Creighton. The jumper has been a question all along.



27. SUNS, Kristaps Porzingis, Latvia, PF, 6-11, 220

It is possible Phoenix does the draft-and-stash twice in the same draft. The Suns will also look at trades. Porzingis is 18, already making a contribution for a team in Spain in the second-best league in the world and moves very well for a big man who could keep growing.



28. CLIPPERS, Glenn Robinson III, Michigan, SF, 6-6, 215

The son of Big Dog Robinson, in the lottery conversation at the start of the season, did not take advantage of the chance to star after the departures of 2013 first-rounders Trey Burke and Tim Hardaway Jr. and the injury to Mitch McGary. The Clippers were picking up a lot of small forwards -- Danny Granger, Hedo Turkoglu -- for help on the bench.



29. THUNDER, Mario Hezonja, Croatia, SG, 6-6, 200

Hezonja has been one of the top backcourt prospects in Europe for years and is still only 18, making this the first time he is draft eligible. His size and ability to score from many places equals great possibilities.



30. SPURS, Mitch McGary, Michigan, PF-C, 6-10, 260

If McGary is cleared after a serious back injury -- if -- he has a chance to be part of a big-man rotation. The Spurs wouldn't need a major contribution right away, just the certainty he will be able to play and that the NCAA suspension for marijuana use was nothing more than youthful indiscretion.


We wanted to draft Stauskas, Nurkic, Saric at #7 anyways (some of us at least$. This way, we'll end up getting one + a possible future superstar (LaVine anyone?)
I think Phoenix would be crazy to do this deal but they might like Aaron Gordon or possible Noah Vonleh if he falls. We could get a big man and a solid shooter for our picks.
Sure, maybe not NBA ready but we won't be anyways until summer 2015 by then I expect puzzle pieces to fall and our prospects to prosper.
 
If Phoenix is not convinced, we could throw in D-Will or JT?
But in return, I'd want their 27th pick as well.

Then, we'd have 3 first round picks. I'd do it in a heart beat whereas Phoenix gets a former and relatively young #2 pick as well as a potential superstar #8 pick.
 
if we could nab stauskas and capela for the 8th..

Exactly
Or a possible pg/PF option

I'd do it in a heart beat if I was GM seems like PDA wants a washed up Vet
Which is pathetic
If you're gonna get lottery in one of most hyped drafts then pick some prospects you might get a superstar from it or at an Ibala assuming we get Capela

I don't want a washed up vet that's going to have a hard time with Cousins anyways.

But suns would have to be pretty stupid to do this deal...
 
Exactly
Or a possible pg/PF option

I'd do it in a heart beat if I was GM seems like PDA wants a washed up Vet
Which is pathetic
If you're gonna get lottery in one of most hyped drafts then pick some prospects you might get a superstar from it or at an Ibala assuming we get Capela

I don't want a washed up vet that's going to have a hard time with Cousins anyways.

But suns would have to be pretty stupid to do this deal...


You are officially the new worst poster on this board. You just make outlandish statements, for...absolutely no reason.

I'm sure PDA put out a special message on the private GM bat phone line "....#8 pick available, seeking washed up Vet..."
 
If we're actually dangling the #8 pick for veteran talent because we want contributions now, as the rumor suggests, we would seem unlikely to trade down to get nothing but two draft picks who won't be able to contribute now. I just don't see us trading down without ALSO getting a solid vet.
 
You are officially the new worst poster on this board. You just make outlandish statements, for...absolutely no reason.

I'm sure PDA put out a special message on the private GM bat phone line "....#8 pick available, seeking washed up Vet..."

And you are just as washed up as the vet PDA is seeking.
What decent VET could we potentially acquire that's worthy of giving up the #8 pick in an overhyped draft. Nobody will give their star VET for a potential star so you're already losing out there. You'll get 1 washed up vet or 2 average role players who are passed their prime cause that is what a VET is. Plus, no quality VET will want to come to a losing team like Sac. If we got a top 3 pick then we'd be on to something. At this point, we're better off getting two top 20 picks where there's star potential and developing them for next two seasons. VET or not, Kings aren't making the playoffs next year. Far too many holes to fill in one season not to mention all the baggage we have in JT (doesn't even want to be here), Terry (again, doesn't want to be here), Evans, Outlaw, and the king of all contracts Mr. Landry himself.
No way in hell is it worth to give up a pick for a vet. Any quality vet is making far more money than what we can offering with Gay and IT in the squad.
 
If we're actually dangling the #8 pick for veteran talent because we want contributions now, as the rumor suggests, we would seem unlikely to trade down to get nothing but two draft picks who won't be able to contribute now. I just don't see us trading down without ALSO getting a solid vet.

What makes you think that we can get a Vet worthy enough to lead us to playoffs.
Read my previous post. VET or not, we're not making the playoffs next season not only that but we'll most likely lose our draft pick next year as well. On top of all that, the VET will probably leave by the time Kings "may" be ready for potential playoff berth. Not happening.

That's why you get two prosperous talents in draft and milk them. Come two years, they'll be good enough to help this team in a playoff run.
Stauskas, Saric, LaVine, Nurkic, Capela Etc we can get two for price of one.
Most people forget how much quality comes from 11-20th picks
Kobe Bryant anyone?
 
I don't see any possibility of that happening. It assumes that the talent you can get at #14 and #18 isn't as great as the talent at #8, which I don't think is the case. The guy you get at #18 could be better than the guy you get at #8. So there's no reason that Phoenix should do that deal. They can get two of "x" and the Kings can only get one of "x".
 
I don't see any possibility of that happening. It assumes that the talent you can get at #14 and #18 isn't as great as the talent at #8, which I don't think is the case. The guy you get at #18 could be better than the guy you get at #8. So there's no reason that Phoenix should do that deal. They can get two of "x" and the Kings can only get one of "x".

Well, technically, Vonleh is potential superstar status so is Randle who might fall to us and they need a big bad. I see it happening but not from our end. Our guys are too dumb.
 
Well, coming out of the draft with Stauskas and Capela would be a great result, if no deals for the right veteran were there by the end of June.
 
What makes you think Vonleh has superstar potential?!? In my opinion a superstar is Durant, LBJ, Tim Duncan, Chris Paul, Kobe. Do you believe he can reach this level?!? A little hoptimistic I think...

Then I really don't understand why you are so sure PDA wants to trade for a washed up veteran... Where did you get this idea?!? Why? What the FO is doing is exploring all the options they have. You never know what other teams want to do. Someone could be ready for a complete rebuilding, someone like Boston for example. Last year the 6th pick in a much weaker draft brought Holiday to the Pelicans. An all star young PG. It's possible to land talent trading the 8th pick if the right deal comes around.

So, at least wait for PDA's move before throwing him under the bus for something he has not even done yet!
 
What makes you think Vonleh has superstar potential?!? In my opinion a superstar is Durant, LBJ, Tim Duncan, Chris Paul, Kobe. Do you believe he can reach this level?!? A little hoptimistic I think...

Then I really don't understand why you are so sure PDA wants to trade for a washed up veteran... Where did you get this idea?!? Why? What the FO is doing is exploring all the options they have. You never know what other teams want to do. Someone could be ready for a complete rebuilding, someone like Boston for example. Last year the 6th pick in a much weaker draft brought Holiday to the Pelicans. An all star young PG. It's possible to land talent trading the 8th pick if the right deal comes around.

So, at least wait for PDA's move before throwing him under the bus for something he has not even done yet!

To be fair, Holiday was traded for Noel PLUS a 1st rounder this year.
 
Most people forget how much quality comes from 11-20th picks

And likewise people forget how many busts come out of the top 10.

Here's a list of underwhelming players drafted in the top 10 from 2000-2011

Stromile Swift
Darius Miles
Marcus Fizer
Chris Mihm
Kwame Brown
Eddy Curry
Eddie Griffin
Sagana Diop
Rodney White
Nikoloz Tskitishvilli
Dajuan Wagner
Chris Wilcox
Darko Milicic
Mike Sweetney
Jarvis Hayes
Josh Childress
Rafael Araujo
Luke Jackson
Charlie Villanueva
Channing Frye
Ide Diogu
Andrew Bynum
Andrea Bargnani
Adam Morrison
Tyus Thomas
Sheldon Williams
Randy Foye
Patrick O'Bryant
Saer Sene
Yi Jianlian
Michael Beasley
Joe Alexander
Hasheem Thabeet
Jonny Flynn
Jordan Hill
Evan Turner
Ekpe Udoh
Al-Farouq Aminu
Jan Vesely
Bismack Biyombo
Jimmer Fredette

and that's not counting guys whose careers were derailed due to injury like DerMarr Johnson, Jay Williams, TJ Ford, Brandon Roy, Greg Oden etc. Or guys from the last two drafts who I can't label as busts definitively but certainly show the signs such as Thomas Robinson. And that's not also counting guys that I think are good players but not the stars they should have been based on their draft position.

Yes, by trading the pick the Kings could be missing out on a superstar talent. But more likely they are getting a decent player or a bust. That's why teams don't dangle game changing players for the 8th pick. Ask Warrior fans if they got even value when they dealt Mitch Richmond for the Kings for the #3 pick that became Billy Owens. And there are plenty of examples that go the other way.

The point is one that I thought we all already knew - the draft is a crapshoot. I thought Otto Porter would be a great SF and ideal glue guy and so far he's not looking like a player at all.

If Petrie was still at the wheel we know how this would play out. The Kings would stand pat at #8 and draft one of the best players available at that slot. I don't have that kind of faith in D'Alessandro's drafting acumen.

As the draft approaches everyone sees draft comparisons or looks at the guys they liked during the NCAA season or tournament and think it's chock full of can't miss prospects. It isn't.

Personally I'll wait to lambast the front office until they actually draft a player or trade the pick and see whether I like what they did instead of hammering them on May 21st.
 
If we're actually dangling the #8 pick for veteran talent because we want contributions now, as the rumor suggests, we would seem unlikely to trade down to get nothing but two draft picks who won't be able to contribute now. I just don't see us trading down without ALSO getting a solid vet.

It sounds like they're considering all possible scenarios, which could include trading down for more picks, I guess:

D’Alessandro said the Kings are open to trading up, trading down, or moving out of the first round entirely. The team is overloaded with big men, but the initial draft discussion has focused on finding the best player available regardless of position, he said. “That’s what we’ve been talking about. But at the moment of truth, you do wonder, ‘Should we tear all that reasoning down and get a player who fits our team now?’”

Link here.
 
And likewise people forget how many busts come out of the top 10.

Here's a list of underwhelming players drafted in the top 10 from 2000-2011

Stromile Swift
Darius Miles
Marcus Fizer
Chris Mihm
Kwame Brown
Eddy Curry
Eddie Griffin
Sagana Diop
Rodney White
Nikoloz Tskitishvilli
Dajuan Wagner
Chris Wilcox
Darko Milicic
Mike Sweetney
Jarvis Hayes
Josh Childress
Rafael Araujo
Luke Jackson
Charlie Villanueva
Channing Frye
Ide Diogu
Andrew Bynum
Andrea Bargnani
Adam Morrison
Tyus Thomas
Sheldon Williams
Randy Foye
Patrick O'Bryant
Saer Sene
Yi Jianlian
Michael Beasley
Joe Alexander
Hasheem Thabeet
Jonny Flynn
Jordan Hill
Evan Turner
Ekpe Udoh
Al-Farouq Aminu
Jan Vesely
Bismack Biyombo
Jimmer Fredette

and that's not counting guys whose careers were derailed due to injury like DerMarr Johnson, Jay Williams, TJ Ford, Brandon Roy, Greg Oden etc. Or guys from the last two drafts who I can't label as busts definitively but certainly show the signs such as Thomas Robinson. And that's not also counting guys that I think are good players but not the stars they should have been based on their draft position.

Yes, by trading the pick the Kings could be missing out on a superstar talent. But more likely they are getting a decent player or a bust. That's why teams don't dangle game changing players for the 8th pick. Ask Warrior fans if they got even value when they dealt Mitch Richmond for the Kings for the #3 pick that became Billy Owens. And there are plenty of examples that go the other way.

The point is one that I thought we all already knew - the draft is a crapshoot. I thought Otto Porter would be a great SF and ideal glue guy and so far he's not looking like a player at all.

If Petrie was still at the wheel we know how this would play out. The Kings would stand pat at #8 and draft one of the best players available at that slot. I don't have that kind of faith in D'Alessandro's drafting acumen.

As the draft approaches everyone sees draft comparisons or looks at the guys they liked during the NCAA season or tournament and think it's chock full of can't miss prospects. It isn't.

Personally I'll wait to lambast the front office until they actually draft a player or trade the pick and see whether I like what they did instead of hammering them on May 21st.

We could say the same for top 10.
The fact is, you're being rewarded more for getting a gem 11-20th position.
 
And likewise people forget how many busts come out of the top 10.

Here's a list of underwhelming players drafted in the top 10 from 2000-2011

Stromile Swift
Darius Miles
Marcus Fizer
Chris Mihm
Kwame Brown
Eddy Curry
Eddie Griffin
Sagana Diop
Rodney White
Nikoloz Tskitishvilli
Dajuan Wagner
Chris Wilcox
Darko Milicic
Mike Sweetney
Jarvis Hayes
Josh Childress
Rafael Araujo
Luke Jackson
Charlie Villanueva
Channing Frye
Ide Diogu
Andrew Bynum
Andrea Bargnani
Adam Morrison
Tyus Thomas
Sheldon Williams
Randy Foye
Patrick O'Bryant
Saer Sene
Yi Jianlian
Michael Beasley
Joe Alexander
Hasheem Thabeet
Jonny Flynn
Jordan Hill
Evan Turner
Ekpe Udoh
Al-Farouq Aminu
Jan Vesely
Bismack Biyombo
Jimmer Fredette

and that's not counting guys whose careers were derailed due to injury like DerMarr Johnson, Jay Williams, TJ Ford, Brandon Roy, Greg Oden etc. Or guys from the last two drafts who I can't label as busts definitively but certainly show the signs such as Thomas Robinson. And that's not also counting guys that I think are good players but not the stars they should have been based on their draft position.

Yes, by trading the pick the Kings could be missing out on a superstar talent. But more likely they are getting a decent player or a bust. That's why teams don't dangle game changing players for the 8th pick. Ask Warrior fans if they got even value when they dealt Mitch Richmond for the Kings for the #3 pick that became Billy Owens. And there are plenty of examples that go the other way.

The point is one that I thought we all already knew - the draft is a crapshoot. I thought Otto Porter would be a great SF and ideal glue guy and so far he's not looking like a player at all.

If Petrie was still at the wheel we know how this would play out. The Kings would stand pat at #8 and draft one of the best players available at that slot. I don't have that kind of faith in D'Alessandro's drafting acumen.

As the draft approaches everyone sees draft comparisons or looks at the guys they liked during the NCAA season or tournament and think it's chock full of can't miss prospects. It isn't.

Personally I'll wait to lambast the front office until they actually draft a player or trade the pick and see whether I like what they did instead of hammering them on May 21st.

Ditto on Porter. I also thought the same on Corey Brewer and it took him about 5 years to become a decent player. What makes it even more of a crapshoot in the world of today is that there are so many one-and-done players, so you have to try to "project" what those projects are going to be in three or four years, which increases the overall risk of the draft.
 
And you are just as washed up as the vet PDA is seeking.
What decent VET could we potentially acquire that's worthy of giving up the #8 pick in an overhyped draft. Nobody will give their star VET for a potential star so you're already losing out there. You'll get 1 washed up vet or 2 average role players who are passed their prime cause that is what a VET is. Plus, no quality VET will want to come to a losing team like Sac. If we got a top 3 pick then we'd be on to something. At this point, we're better off getting two top 20 picks where there's star potential and developing them for next two seasons. VET or not, Kings aren't making the playoffs next year. Far too many holes to fill in one season not to mention all the baggage we have in JT (doesn't even want to be here), Terry (again, doesn't want to be here), Evans, Outlaw, and the king of all contracts Mr. Landry himself.
No way in hell is it worth to give up a pick for a vet. Any quality vet is making far more money than what we can offering with Gay and IT in the squad.

So on the one hand you say it's an "overhyped" draft that couldn't net us anything if we trade the #8 pick (cause the draft is so "overhyped", after all), then you go on to say we could get two top 20 picks with "star potential".

First, if the draft is so "overhyped" who the hell would trade us two top twenty picks for a number 8?

Second, you state that it's impossible to trade for any quality vet simply because we've been a losing team lately. If that's the case, then we shouldn't ever try to make any trades for any good players that have experience. Because they won't want to come here and play. Makes sense. You should be our GM.

Time to give up the keys to the internet man. You're guilty of reckless typing.

I'm trying to make you aware of what a jackass you sound like.

It's clear you have passion as a fan, and potentially maybe even some good ideas. But if you want to be taken seriously, you simply can't type stuff like you did here. Because it makes no sense and you just come off sounding angry and full of yourself, and, frankly, stupid*.



































*Not saying you are, I'm saying that's what most people are likely to perceive based on your presentation.
 
Last edited:
If you could guarantee me that we get Elfrid Payton and Clint Capela with those picks, I'd happily make the trade. Phoenix has three picks so they're going to be looking to trade up. Wanting to trade the pick for a veteran and actually finding a taker are two different things and I just don't see #8 having that much value in that regard. Not without throwing in something else. Chicago is another interesting option because not only do they have multiple picks, but they also control the rights to our (protected) pick next year. If they're looking to deal for Melo with a multi-pick package, that may be an opportunity for us to get somebody.
 
We could get any one of these prospects (below) and possibly Adreian Payne, Rodney Hood, Dario Saric, or Jusuf Nurkic if they fall to us.

14. SUNS, Nik Stauskas, Michigan, SG, 6-6, 205


Phoenix already has a nice backcourt with Eric Bledsoe and Goran Dragic, but Stauskas is more of a prototype shooting guard who can also handle the ball. He shot 47 percent overall, 44.2 percent on 3s, packed a lot of experience in pressure situations into two college seasons -- the Big Ten Player of the Year checks a lot of boxes.



15: HAWKS, Gary Harris, Michigan St., SG, 6-4, 210

Harris' stock took a slight hit as a shooting guard who went from 45.6 percent from the field as a freshman to 42.9 in 2013-14 and from 41.1 percent on 3s to 35.2. He has good strength and can get to the rim, even though a little undersized.



16. BULLS, Tyler Ennis, Syracuse, PG, 6-2, 180

This is too low for the best true point guard available, though without physical wow factor of Exum or Smart, but it's tough to find a team with a pressing point guard need around 10 to 14 if the Magic choose Exum near the top. Ennis won over front offices and went from prospect for the future to the immediate impact of one of the best freshmen in the country with steady play and composure beyond his years.



17. CELTICS, P.J. Hairston, D-League, SG, 6-4, 220

Hairston finished his season with the Texas Legends at 21.8 points and 32.3 minutes in 26 games, reinforcing his standing as a first-rounder who can score from the perimeter or go hard to the rim. Teams will look hard at his background after being suspended by the NCAA, in part over some acquaintances.



18. SUNS, Clint Capela, Switzerland, PF, 6-10, 210

He moved well into the first round with good showings in France, then pushed into lottery contention by flashing mobility to go with the size and toughness inside. Phoenix does not want three rookies on the roster. A nice prospect who could spend another season overseas is an ideal outcome here.



19. BULLS, Kyle Anderson, UCLA, SF, 6-9, 230

He can handle the ball for a forward, is versatile, has good size and a nice feel for the game. A lack of athleticism that will hurt his ability to create and defend, though, and some teams see the possible future role as a point forward oversold because NBA defenses will take away a lot of what made him effective in college.



20. RAPTORS, Zach LaVine, UCLA, PG-SG, 6-5, 180

The chance to let LaVine develop behind Lowry is worth strong consideration amid questions from teams whether he is a true point guard. UCLA didn't play him there last season, but LaVine, an electric athlete, insists that is his true position. If he proves it, there is a real big upside.



21. THUNDER, T.J. Warren, North Carolina St., SF, 6-8, 225

For depth, because Oklahoma City seems to be in decent shape at small forward. Without any consistent 3-point range, Warren can score in bunches, has nice instincts and does damage on the boards.



22. GRIZZLIES, James Young, Kentucky, SF, 6-7, 210

Though he doesn't have ideal athleticism, Young will be a nice scoring addition for any team. Memphis in particular can use the points, and especially from the perimeter. Playing when defenses have to pay so much attention to Marc Gasol and Zach Randolph inside would be a good way to break into the league.



23. JAZZ, K.J. McDaniels, Clemson, SF, 6-6, 198

Hall of Fame coach Larry Brown called him a human stat sheet. McDaniels scores, rebounds and blocks shots as a mega-athlete who will be able to use those physical gifts to overcome the size disadvantage waiting for him in the frontcourt in the pros.



24. HORNETS, Vasilije Micic, Serbia, PG, 6-4, 190

While he won't beat many people off the dribble, a potential problem, Micic is a pass-first point guard with vision, size and the ability to deliver the ball at the right time and place. He would be a nice complement off the bench to the smaller, quicker Kemba Walker.



25. ROCKETS, Jerami Grant, Syracuse, SF, 6-8, 210

Harvey's son/Horace's nephew, a reserve for the Orangemen, scores, rebounds and has the kind of wingspan and athleticism that indicates he could become a standout defender.



26. HEAT, Elfrid Payton, La. Lafayette, PG, 6-4, 185

Payton has good size, ball skills, defends and experience with the United States under-19 national team last summer. He didn't face top competition much in 2013-14, and when he did: 6-for-19 against Baylor, 3-for-11 against Louisville, 9-for-20 against Creighton. The jumper has been a question all along.



27. SUNS, Kristaps Porzingis, Latvia, PF, 6-11, 220

It is possible Phoenix does the draft-and-stash twice in the same draft. The Suns will also look at trades. Porzingis is 18, already making a contribution for a team in Spain in the second-best league in the world and moves very well for a big man who could keep growing.



28. CLIPPERS, Glenn Robinson III, Michigan, SF, 6-6, 215

The son of Big Dog Robinson, in the lottery conversation at the start of the season, did not take advantage of the chance to star after the departures of 2013 first-rounders Trey Burke and Tim Hardaway Jr. and the injury to Mitch McGary. The Clippers were picking up a lot of small forwards -- Danny Granger, Hedo Turkoglu -- for help on the bench.



29. THUNDER, Mario Hezonja, Croatia, SG, 6-6, 200

Hezonja has been one of the top backcourt prospects in Europe for years and is still only 18, making this the first time he is draft eligible. His size and ability to score from many places equals great possibilities.



30. SPURS, Mitch McGary, Michigan, PF-C, 6-10, 260

If McGary is cleared after a serious back injury -- if -- he has a chance to be part of a big-man rotation. The Spurs wouldn't need a major contribution right away, just the certainty he will be able to play and that the NCAA suspension for marijuana use was nothing more than youthful indiscretion.


We wanted to draft Stauskas, Nurkic, Saric at #7 anyways (some of us at least$. This way, we'll end up getting one + a possible future superstar (LaVine anyone?)
I think Phoenix would be crazy to do this deal but they might like Aaron Gordon or possible Noah Vonleh if he falls. We could get a big man and a solid shooter for our picks.
Sure, maybe not NBA ready but we won't be anyways until summer 2015 by then I expect puzzle pieces to fall and our prospects to prosper.

If you could guarantee that Stauskas would be there at 14, then I'd agree to that deal. Problem is, I don't think he will be. But I could be wrong. Naw!
 
It sounds like they're considering all possible scenarios, which could include trading down for more picks, I guess:

Yeah, that's something I hadn't heard. On the other hand, the Scott Howard Cooper rumor (Kings only interested in a vet) did come immediately with a "which means they'll go after Dennis Schroder" grain of salt, didn't it?
 
Yeah, that's something I hadn't heard. On the other hand, the Scott Howard Cooper rumor (Kings only interested in a vet) did come immediately with a "which means they'll go after Dennis Schroder" grain of salt, didn't it?

Well, the Shroeder "rumor" I read was pure speculation. Basically, after we say we are looking to trade, at the bottom it said "the Kings could be interested in Shroeder, who they liked last year" etc.
 
Well, the Shroeder "rumor" I read was pure speculation. Basically, after we say we are looking to trade, at the bottom it said "the Kings could be interested in Shroeder, who they liked last year" etc.

Exactly. It's just weird that Kings fans say "Taj Gibson" while SHC says "Schroder". SHC has in the past seemed a bit out of touch, and this is no exception. PDA gave an interview with DraftExpress where he seemed open to a lot of possibilities - is SHC even right that the Kings are hellbent on (not open to, but hellbent on) trading the #8?
 
I would love the Kings to trade down if the value is there. IMO, the Kings don't have the salary cap room to sign any impact vets, (if Rudy opts in) but next year, we'll have ALOT of cap room to sign REAL impact vets. (even if Rudy resigns with us) And if we could somehow get two first round picks in the DEEPEST draft we had since 2003, then I'm up for it. Jay Bilas said himself that even though this draft doesn't have a clear cut #1 player, the strength of the draft is how deep it is; so it would be wise to draft quantity over quality IMO-esp. since if the "big 7" are gone. I would also hope that the kings would buy an early second round pick from a team.

So IF we could somehow acquire 3 picks on draft night either by trade or buying picks, we could hope that these three players plus the core of Cousins, Mclemore, and MAYBE Gay, and Thomas, Sacramento would be better in better position in 2015 in acquiring real impact vets.
 
I would love the Kings to trade down if the value is there. IMO, the Kings don't have the salary cap room to sign any impact vets, (if Rudy opts in) but next year, we'll have ALOT of cap room to sign REAL impact vets. (even if Rudy resigns with us) And if we could somehow get two first round picks in the DEEPEST draft we had since 2003, then I'm up for it. Jay Bilas said himself that even though this draft doesn't have a clear cut #1 player, the strength of the draft is how deep it is; so it would be wise to draft quantity over quality IMO-esp. since if the "big 7" are gone. I would also hope that the kings would buy an early second round pick from a team.

So IF we could somehow acquire 3 picks on draft night either by trade or buying picks, we could hope that these three players plus the core of Cousins, Mclemore, and MAYBE Gay, and Thomas, Sacramento would be better in better position in 2015 in acquiring real impact vets.

it's a good way to fill out the roster with cheap young talent. if they pan out then you have them for at least 6-8yrs through 2 contracts
 
Back
Top