rainmaker
Hall of Famer
Along with having no go to player, and an overall lack of talent.The Hawks losing a player to injury every third quarter is what's killing Atlanta.
Along with having no go to player, and an overall lack of talent.The Hawks losing a player to injury every third quarter is what's killing Atlanta.
Nope. If they had a go-to player, they'd still be losing. LeBron James is just that good.Along with having no go to player, and an overall lack of talent.
You are clearly working with a different value of "recent" than I am.In general, these have been the worst playoffs in recent memory.
I never suggested they wouldn't be losing if they had a go to player.....Nope. If they had a go-to player, they'd still be losing. LeBron James is just that good.
If anything, I see these playoffs as a strong argument against tanking: you should always try to remain competitive, because you never know when a couple of (un)timely injuries and a favorable bracket could, unexpectedly, hand you an easy road to the Finals.
People have become so accustomed to dynasties lately, that it's easy to forget that the NBA went through a stretch of nearly twenty years (1970-1988) without any teams winning back-to-back championships. Hell, between 1970 and 1979, eight different teams won the championship, and this is shaping up to be another decade like that: we're already guaranteed to get our fifth different champion in six years.
That's why a player like Cousins is so important. Get competent management to build a team around a guy like that, and you've always got a shot; you never know when you could be a torn ACL away from the Finals.
I'll be god damned if I'm going to declare the Warriors the next dynasty when they haven't won their first one yet. Maybe they're not going away, and maybe this year is a fluke, that they can't duplicate it. I would have bet money that the Thunder would be around for years and years, after they came back from down 0-2 to win four straight against the Spurs, and they haven't been back since, in no small part due to the fact that they couldn't keep Harden.
Until or unless Golden State can re-sign Green, the question of whether they're going away or not isn't even a conversation worth having.
Unless, of course, it turns out that Alvin Gentry is the actual "real deal."
On a somewhat related note, I'd prefer to follow the story/journey about how DeMarcus Cousins and co. fought and struggled for a championship rather than trade for some randoms to get the Kings a win. It seems more emotional and more satisfying to win with an identity. I want to cheer for players, not a front office. Just an opinion.If anything, I see these playoffs as a strong argument against tanking: you should always try to remain competitive, because you never know when a couple of (un)timely injuries and a favorable bracket could, unexpectedly, hand you an easy road to the Finals.
People have become so accustomed to dynasties lately, that it's easy to forget that the NBA went through a stretch of nearly twenty years (1970-1988) without any teams winning back-to-back championships. Hell, between 1970 and 1979, eight different teams won the championship, and this is shaping up to be another decade like that: we're already guaranteed to get our fifth different champion in six years.
That's why a player like Cousins is so important. Get competent management to build a team around a guy like that, and you've always got a shot; you never know when you could be a torn ACL away from the Finals.
I simply don't see Curry lasting 5 years without getting a major injury.I don't think these playoffs really say a lot about dynasties going away. Lebron has his own personal dynasty in the East, and I don't think the Warriors are going away in the next 5 years.
Steph Curry is insane. There is seriously not one thing he can't do very well offensively, and his IQ is as good as it gets. He's not my style of player, but holy poopoo, the guy is just insane. He actually gets better under pressure. I had no idea his insane performances for Davidson would translate so well to the NBA, but the guy is a cold blooded winner.
Yeah ... his outside shooting ability is ridiculous. I'd take an outside jumpshot from him over almost any post player posting up in the league. I used to think that there was no chance his shot would fall consistently enough over a 7 game series. Now I think there's no chance his shot will miss consistently over a 7 game series.
I think you meant Donatas Motiejunas. Malone loves inside-out.I also think Malone would be a perfect fit in Houston. They have a relatively simple offense and he could just turn the keys over to Harden. But it he got the Beard to play defense and implemented a disciplined defensive scheme around Dwight, that team would be scary.
Steph Curry needs to get fitted with head gear before the NBA finals![]()
I haven't rooted for "vengeance" since I cringed watching Bruce Bowen delight in taking out players. Right now, I'm not adverse to seeing Dellavedova get some of his own medicine.
I simply don't see Curry lasting 5 years without getting a major injury.
Guy is way too small and plays WAY too hard (and too long in close games) to make it very long without getting injured.
I think the Warriors would fall apart without Steph's utter brilliance making them chug along.
The guy is having a playoffs for the ages, and I just don't feel like he's going to get better than this. He feels to me more like a "meteoric rise" kinda career more than a "long-time dominant force" career.
Curry is the most rested superstar in this league, he pretty much didn't play fourth quarters all regular season. so him playing a lot in the playoffs shouldn't be too much of a problem. plus, he's not doing as many of the things that ordinarily get you hurt (finish around the rim with contact, go for contested rebounds, hustle for loose balls). he has had ankle problems in his first few years, but right now, of the superstar guys, he's the most likely to stick around injury free, imo.
Dellavedova needs to be suspended and fined. Disgusting...