Mavs @ Kings Game Thread
- Thread starter piksi
- Start date
- Status
So it's excusable to take a three when you have 12 seconds to get a two point shot to tie the game? My problem is that the general rule is that the home team always plays for overtime. My problem is that the set that they ran only yielded a three? Can that be my problem? Thanks.
And how am I out of line?
And how am I out of line?
Terry, and every other Mav for that matter would have been trying to shoot a three.....that's my point.
If the Kings would have gotten the 2 points they wouldn't be worrying about the refs and they would be trying to stop the 3.
This really had nothing to do with "playing through it" or whatever anyone wants to say. This was a totally inexcusable non-call that cost the team 2 points.
If the Kings would have gotten the 2 points they wouldn't be worrying about the refs and they would be trying to stop the 3.
This really had nothing to do with "playing through it" or whatever anyone wants to say. This was a totally inexcusable non-call that cost the team 2 points.
A
i hope that our starting line up, coach, owners and gm are all fined tomorrow for saying that the refs all f'n suck...... they should all say in the post game interview that the refs suck and that stern is a dick for not using instant replay and letting the refs determine the outcome of games........
They didn't try the three at the 12 second mark. They tried to get someone open. Bibby passed in to Webber, who was covered. He passed it out to MIller, who tried to get it back into Webber, but had to get it out to Bibby because there was virtually no time left. The ball left Bibby's hands for the shot just before the buzzer.
Your problem is you ALWAYS want to think the worst about our team and you're depending on radio broadcasts. You never believe what those of us who actually watched the bleeping game have to say.
Your problem is you ALWAYS want to think the worst about our team and you're depending on radio broadcasts. You never believe what those of us who actually watched the bleeping game have to say.
No argument there but the Kings have NO POWER over what the Refs do, only over what they do. For better or worse the gloves are off and the Kings better understand the officaials will NOT bail them out or even make it easy for them. So they can either expect to loose OR take the refs out of the game. I vote for taking the refs out fo the game.
ever heard of take what the Defense gives you? yeah i know we're talking about the Mavs here but as much as i hate to admit it, they played pretty well on D in that last play & that was the best possible sequence that went for us at that time.
i would've of course preferred they had taken the higher percentage shot but Bib was open & it was a good look with time winding down. had he taken a few more dribbles or hesitated on bit, time would've expired already by then.
i would've of course preferred they had taken the higher percentage shot but Bib was open & it was a good look with time winding down. had he taken a few more dribbles or hesitated on bit, time would've expired already by then.
Yes, I am aware that they tried the three with very little time left on the clock, and that apparently that was the best shot that they could get, but I can still be frustrated by that, can't I? I can still lament that the only shot the team could get with 12 seconds was an open three, right?
I haven't disputed one single thing those of you who "watched" the game have had to say, and yes, I'm a pessimistic Kings' fan. Team isn't giving me much reason to be otherwise over the last four games, is it?
I haven't disputed one single thing those of you who "watched" the game have had to say, and yes, I'm a pessimistic Kings' fan. Team isn't giving me much reason to be otherwise over the last four games, is it?
- Status