Incredible, I just read an article, and maybe its already been posted and I missed it, but it said the Maloofs won't sell unless they can retain the rights to have a say in the management of the team. If they can't, then their going to apply for relocation to Anaheim again. If the relocation committee deny's the request, then they'll sue the NBA. By the time this is over with, they will be the most hated owners in the history of sports. I don't think they're making many friends amongst the BOG'ers.
The article was by Ric Bucher, so you have to take it with a grain of salt.
Incredible, I just read an article, and maybe its already been posted and I missed it, but it said the Maloofs won't sell unless they can retain the rights to have a say in the management of the team. If they can't, then their going to apply for relocation to Anaheim again. If the relocation committee deny's the request, then they'll sue the NBA. By the time this is over with, they will be the most hated owners in the history of sports. I don't think they're making many friends amongst the BOG'ers.
The article was by Ric Bucher, so you have to take it with a grain of salt.
Aaron Bruski@aaronbruskiThe Maloofs have no leverage in the OC, no deal in the OC, and no leverage in an antitrust suit. Anybody reporting that is on the take.
Bruski seems to think that rumor is total hogwash. I'll take his word for it over some clown like Bucher
No argument from me. Bucher is one of those guys that I have no respect for at all. One of my enjoyable moments came when Mark Cuban litterally took apart Bucher on ESPN. He exposed Bucher for the ignorant A$$ he is. It wouldn't surprise me if the Maloofs didn't threaten to move to Anaheim again though. I read on another thread, and I'm sorry I can't remember his name, but he's an antitrust expert, that its possible that the franchise agreement the Maloofs signed with the NBA has a no lawsuit agreement in it. If true, then the Maloofs are totally screwed if their planning an antitrust suit against the league. He said this kind of wording is usually in the "Best interest of the NBA" part of the franchise agreement.
Maloofs = Corleones but every brother is Fredo???
Good, that means all 3 are going to get whacked.
No one said it was a discount. But for any buyer that wants to move the team, they have to pay off the city loan immediately. Someone buying the team to keep in Sacramento does not have to factor in immediate repayment. I imagine it would be paid off or terms renegotiated, in conjunction with building a new arena. The bottom line is someone moving the team has to come up with the money to repay the city's loan now, while someone stying doesn't have to factor that into buying the team to keep it here.A local buyer who inherits the $77M loan is in no better position than the Seattle group if they chose to pay that loan back with another loan. That's the point. Many include the $77 million loan as some kind of discount, it isn't. The main difference/discount of buying locally is only the relocation fee. Don't see how you could argue otherwise.
stevelarge_cbs13 @largesteven
JMA Ventures planned bid for Kings includes Darius Anderson. The same man that connected billionaire Ron Burkle to KJ two years ago.
guys what is the word on the ground and feeling currently?? i was rsigned to losing them so stepped away for the last few days and i come back and we have a buyer and everyone is happy.... are we saved???
Where is Burkle?
if anyone is watching the football game right now, at the end of the first half Seattle had a first and goal, and came away with NOTHING........