I dunno. The make up of that Lakers team makes me think that they are due for a massive flame-out next year. Both Kobe and Nash are ball dominant guys. Plus 4/5 of that starting line-up is in the decline phase of their careers.
It's great that Steve Nash is old school and would be extremely difficult for him, to put on a Fakers jersey. Especially after all the playoff battles,etc. Um yeah ok, I will be waiting to see if there is any Nash bashing like my boy Lebron. Unfortunately our society dosen't work that way. He will get a pass as will Dwight when he goes to L.A. next week for Steve Blake smh lol....
apparently it was kobe who heavily recruited nash and made the final pitch to him that swayed him to LA, there are talks on twitter that nash is trying to bring his buddy grant hill along to LA as well, they were fine defensively this year, they even held OKC relatively in check in the playoffs it was the offense that stalled out on them and thats where nash makes his mark.
I'll start bashing when Nash does a half hour special rubbing his decision in the noses of his fan base. Well, who am I kidding, Ill start bashing Nash the moment he puts on the evil uniform.It's great that Steve Nash is old school and would be extremely difficult for him, to put on a Fakers jersey. Especially after all the playoff battles,etc. Um yeah ok, I will be waiting to see if there is any Nash bashing like my boy Lebron. Unfortunately our society dosen't work that way. He will get a pass as will Dwight when he goes to L.A. next week for Steve Blake smh lol....
I'll start bashing when Nash does a half hour special rubbing his decision in the noses of his fan base. Well, who am I kidding, Ill start bashing Nash the moment he puts on the evil uniform.
Dumb question. IMHO.I am so conflicted. I like Nash but can't stand the Lakers. WHAT DO I DO!
Michael Scotto @MikeAScotto
Rumor: Lakers to offer Andrew Bynum, Metta World Peace, & Steve Blake for Dwight Howard & Jason Richardson. Deal hinges on Dwight extension.
91. Can a player be given an extension and traded at the same time?
Similar to a sign-and-trade arrangement (see question number 88), a team may sign an eligible player to an extension (see question number 58) and immediately trade him to another team. Such an "extend-and-trade" is limited to three seasons, which include any seasons remaining on the player's current contract1. The salary in the first season of the extension can have a 4.5% raise over the last season of the existing contract, and subsequent raises are limited to 4.5% of the salary in the first season of the extension.
A player cannot be traded in an extend-and-trade after the season (for example, on draft day) in the last season of his contract, or in any season that might be the last season due to an option or ETO.
Since an extend-and-trade has greater limits than a regular extension (three seasons and 4.5% raises vs. four seasons and 7.5% raises), the rules prevent teams from circumventing these limits by extending and trading the player in separate transactions. If a team extends a player beyond the limits of an extend-and-trade (for example, if they sign a player to a four-year extension), they can't trade the player for six months. Conversely, a team cannot extend a player it receives in trade for six months, if the extension exceeds the limits of an extend-and-trade.
Extend-and-trade transactions are rare. To date they have only been used for Kevin Garnett (traded from Minnesota to Boston in 2007) and Carmelo Anthony (traded from Denver to New York in 2011).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 The current season counts as one full year, even if the extension is signed as late as June 30. So if a contract is extended on June 30 with one full season remaining, only one new season can be added to the contract with an extend-and-trade.
I don't know why people are so worried about this. Nash is old enough he can fall off the cliff at any point now. Kobe is already in decline, and Pau looked to be as well. Could it work? Sure. But there are all kinds of ways they still come up short. Rem the Kobe/Shaq/Mailman/Payton crew? This is no guarantee.
More surprising that Nash, after all the years of saying it didn't matter to the point he was just gong to stay put and wind down, all of a sudden pulled off one of the two ultimate ringchasing with no pride (Miami=other) moves.
I can see Kobe turn into a "sit back and rain 3s" type of guy now for some reason. Kinda what Quentin Richardson did when he played with Nash. So Look for Kobe to shoot about 100-200 more 3pt shots than his previous high.
I don't think this really helps the Lakers. You get a guy like Kobe who's used to controlling the offense and then putting in a PG that's used to doing the same thing, I can't see it working any more than when Sessions was starting.
Personally if they had a guy like Batum with Nash, Pau, Bynum, and Barnes as their starting lineup I see it doing just as well as a lineup with Kobe as the SF/SG. Don't get me wrong though, Kobe is better than anyone they could put at SG/SF but in this situation I don't think he's the best fit, and someone that could rain threes who does not need the ball is probably a better fit i.e. Batum/Barnes.
That being said I still think the Lakers will win 55-60 games.
It's great that Steve Nash is old school and would be extremely difficult for him, to put on a Fakers jersey. Especially after all the playoff battles,etc. Um yeah ok, I will be waiting to see if there is any Nash bashing like my boy Lebron. Unfortunately our society dosen't work that way. He will get a pass as will Dwight when he goes to L.A. next week for Steve Blake smh lol....
I can see Kobe turn into a "sit back and rain 3s" type of guy now for some reason. Kinda what Quentin Richardson did when he played with Nash. So Look for Kobe to shoot about 100-200 more 3pt shots than his previous high.
I don't think this really helps the Lakers. You get a guy like Kobe who's used to controlling the offense and then putting in a PG that's used to doing the same thing, I can't see it working any more than when Sessions was starting.
Personally if they had a guy like Batum with Nash, Pau, Bynum, and Barnes as their starting lineup I see it doing just as well as a lineup with Kobe as the SF/SG. Don't get me wrong though, Kobe is better than anyone they could put at SG/SF but in this situation I don't think he's the best fit, and someone that could rain threes who does not need the ball is probably a better fit i.e. Batum/Barnes.
That being said I still think the Lakers will win 55-60 games.