Seems like there is no defensive schemes in place... just go switch!!! I think Karl admitted to this in preseason.
Seems like our offensive scheme of "fluid, free flow offense" with no structure is really not helping our players.
this was paul westphal's prerogative, as well as keith smart's, as well as poor tyrone corbin's (by way of managerial directive, i'm assuming) before the kings hired george karl. the problem is that the kings simply have not had the personnel across the last five years to execute such an offense, and i'm astonished at the continued attempts to graft a frenetic, up-tempo style of play onto a roster that, even with all of the new faces,
still doesn't scream "PACE!!" demarcus cousins. rudy gay. rajon rondo. these are not names associated with a style of play that seeks to push the pace. they are names associated with a much more deliberate and probing style of play. if the kings were employing a more patient offensive approach, we might see significantly fewer mistakes and turnovers...
that said, karl's got a much stronger pedigree than the above three coaches i listed, and i'd expect him to find a way to grease the wheels of this offense into a more efficient machine as time passes and chemistry develops. though talented, there are far too many new faces to expect a smooth jump into the win column, especially with demarcus out. i just wonder how mightily the defense will continue to suffer in the process of emphasizing karl's dribble drive offense. it strikes me as no coincidence that the kings' strongest stretch of play in many years occurred when mike malone got the kings to buy into a strong
team defensive concept. he inspired a much less talented roster to compete with the very same western conference heavy-weights that the kings are folding to now...
karl, on the other hand, just seems... rather old and tired from his place on the bench, and we're only four games into the season! has he
stood up anywhere along the sideline yet? whatever faults mike malone may have had in his offensive approach, he certainly was an active
presence on the sideline, encouraging his players, arguing with the refs on his team's behalf, etc. he's a coach that went into battle with his players, whereas i can hardly tell if karl is awake out there. he's an aging head coach with health issues, and i don't begrudge him that increasingly laconic posture; it's a long season to endure, after all. but i will consistently wonder whether or not he's the right coach for a quirky but talented kings team that needs to be
motivated to coalesce into a winning team. i honestly have a hard time imagining george karl motivating anybody. and i definitely have a hard time imagining george karl inspiring the kind of brotherhood that malone inspired prior to last season's opening...