Well, starters don't wanna play for the Kings, backups do.
Maybe in the future, but not right here, not right now.
not if they still making these dumb *** moves.....
Well, starters don't wanna play for the Kings, backups do.
Maybe in the future, but not right here, not right now.
Thompson for Asik?
Chuck will be gone with package deal w/ Jimmer for a SF.
What is wrong with Landry.. He did really good in GS.. Idk why all the bashing, who else would you have backing up the PF on a consistent basis, Chuck? Mikki Moore?
Patterson would seem to fit as a stretch 4 next to Howard and a guy with obvious familiarity with the franchise.
Edit to add: obviously the frontcourt is a work in progress. I'll reserve judgment for the final product.
I'm sure teams are jumping at that deal.
Chuck will be gone with package deal w/ Jimmer for a SF.
What is wrong with Landry.. He did really good in GS.. Idk why all the bashing, who else would you have backing up the PF on a consistent basis, Chuck? Mikki Moore?
All star free agents are not coming to Sacramento. Realize the bottom dwelling Kings are not going to transform overnight, it is a process just like the Warriors, it will take time. Less than 2 months into a new ownership and a great deal of you are jumping ship. I am embarrassed that some of you call yourselves Kings fans.
Sam Amick @sam_amick 12m
Landry Exhibit A of how new ownership changing things there. Safe to say he had no interest in returning if previous regime still in place
Wake me up when we do something smart.
It doesn't make sense.
Andre Iguodala would have been terribly expensive, but he made sense. Tyreke Evans would have been kind of expensive, but he made sense. But instead of those guys, we still have a massive gaping hole at the SF in a market quickly drying up of SF options, and we sign a smallish, offensively-oriented PF, which given Patrick Patterson is about the last thing we need. So we spent 4/$26M on the last thing we need.
It doesn't make sense.
Sure, we can hope there's more in the pipeline. For instance, flipping PPat and Hayes for Deng and then resigning Aldrich would make this move look a lot better. But I can tell you that ain't gonna happen. So why did we do it? Why did we spend half the cap space we currently have on a redundant player? Why does every move, every single move this offseason, look bad?
Wake me up when we do something smart.
Can't wait to hear the glass half full guys defend this one.
Pretty sure most of "us" couldn't care less whether you think we're good kings fans. I dealt with this same attitude through the entire last rebuild. Bad moves rarely combine into a vision of a good one. These moved dont address needs, make us better currently or provide super valuable trade assets for the future.
Well, that one came out of nowhere. Landry welcome back... even if I question why exactly you are back. Cousins, PPat, JT, Landry, Hayes... something has to give there. I suspect there will be a trade coming up. Should be interesting to see what unfolds with "Mr. Sees 4 moves Ahead" guiding the roster changes
I've been a glass half full guy about the Tyreke/Vasquez/Iggy situation but this one I cannot defend (hey just like Landry).
Landry is a fine player but he gives us nothing that we need. We already have a similar player in Patterson. Now we have 4 big men that can't block shots worth a damn. I hope and pray that we're packaging the rest of our junk for a guy like Asik or Gortat.
So hiring Malone and drafting McLemore and McCallum (dont sleep on him) are bad moves? This roster is a WORK IN PROGRESS, It is July 6th, we haven't even played summer league games. This is Vivek's, Malone's and PDA's Sacramento Kings, you couldn't expect them to just keep everything as is, especially since we have stunk for years now. This is a new project that will surely keep some remnants of the past, but make no mistake moves are far from over.