Kings secure a possible 1 year option for Kenny Natt

I am one of the few people who actually knows what happened, when and why Musselman was fired. In very kind terms, Mussleman let Ron Artest off his leash(during a knicks game), and Bibby was very keen to the situation, and didn't like it. Bibby stops listening/caring, Artest is in a semi-contract year, made for a disaster. Bibby lost respect for the front office, and those bridges are never rebuilt. Bibby was traded to prevent a huge front office PR meltdown, and luckily he was. Catastrophe averted? Not quite. While Mussleman represent one side of the coaching coin, theus represents the other side. Suprise! Suprise! The ship bolts were tightened and Captain Theus was going to be the man in charge. Problem with that is he isn't the ones playing the game; the leader needs to be in uniform, otherwise its no good. Theus was good prep for Natt. Natt won't exchange a principle for a victory like mussleman, and won't exchange victory for principles like theus. Natt seems like the right person, if its ok with Kevin Martin, im ok with Natt.

Were you one of the ones out re-arranging the deck chairs?
 
I am one of the few people who actually knows what happened, when and why Musselman was fired. In very kind terms, Mussleman let Ron Artest off his leash(during a knicks game), and Bibby was very keen to the situation, and didn't like it. Bibby stops listening/caring, Artest is in a semi-contract year, made for a disaster. Bibby lost respect for the front office, and those bridges are never rebuilt. Bibby was traded to prevent a huge front office PR meltdown, and luckily he was. Catastrophe averted? Not quite. While Mussleman represent one side of the coaching coin, theus represents the other side. Suprise! Suprise! The ship bolts were tightened and Captain Theus was going to be the man in charge. Problem with that is he isn't the ones playing the game; the leader needs to be in uniform, otherwise its no good. Theus was good prep for Natt. Natt won't exchange a principle for a victory like mussleman, and won't exchange victory for principles like theus. Natt seems like the right person, if its ok with Kevin Martin, im ok with Natt.

You making things up or speculating?
 
I am one of the few people who actually knows what happened, when and why Musselman was fired. In very kind terms, Mussleman let Ron Artest off his leash(during a knicks game), and Bibby was very keen to the situation, and didn't like it. Bibby stops listening/caring, Artest is in a semi-contract year, made for a disaster. Bibby lost respect for the front office, and those bridges are never rebuilt. Bibby was traded to prevent a huge front office PR meltdown, and luckily he was. Catastrophe averted? Not quite. While Mussleman represent one side of the coaching coin, theus represents the other side. Suprise! Suprise! The ship bolts were tightened and Captain Theus was going to be the man in charge. Problem with that is he isn't the ones playing the game; the leader needs to be in uniform, otherwise its no good. Theus was good prep for Natt. Natt won't exchange a principle for a victory like mussleman, and won't exchange victory for principles like theus. Natt seems like the right person, if its ok with Kevin Martin, im ok with Natt.

Wow. That's good stuff. You may have a future in creative writing.

;)
 
It means nothing. So the Kings have a one year option on Natt. So what? It's not as if they are terrified that Natt is going to coach someplace else. It's just a move to strengthen Natt's authority with the players. If the players think he's going to be here next year, it's harder to blow him off. If anything, it tells you that some players ARE blowing him off and that's why the Kings org made the move.
 
Back
Top