KingsFanSince85
All-Star
Memphis and LAL lose. Hahahaha.
At this point, I don't care who we face as long as it's not the Lakers.
To be clear it was our customer that gave us free booze along with the usual food comp.I agree that the life situation is analogous; I disagree that both situations reflect poorly on the employer. In your story, your employer is directly involved in incentivising unhealthy behavior, by providing an employee perk that’s inevitably going to ruin some people.
The NBA’s, (or Nike/Gatorade’s) stake is different; It’s a little murky, since they’re interested in Morant as a public figure, so things he does in public can diminish his value as an employee/endorsee. But NBA players aren’t always in public, and it’s inappropriate for an employer to intervene in an employees private affairs. Although the NBA employs “kids”, it doesn’t imply it’s on them to be parents of last resort
At this stage, it's not really relevant.Spurs blow it at the end in what have been a perfect night standings wise
Seems we'll at least match the 00-01 record of 22? I think we can win all 8 of them, so we'll probably win at least half. I'd think in our current form I'd pick 6 without seeing how many are back to back.
Is this good? Can they beat the 25?
Nets
Wiz
Jazz
Blazers
Blazers
Pels
Mavs
Nuggets
This is true, although they're worse with KAT and Gobert together IMO.Wolves going back 7 full games is good - Kings have alot of trouble with them - - unfortunately they could be their first playoff opponent. That would be a tough one.
I think this doesn't take into account the games our opponents play against each other. If it is so, then we can expect to guarantee top 6 somewhat earlier.SIf I am correct 7-7 the rest of the way guarantees top 6 and 8-6 guarantees home field
I was thinking the same thing earlier today...Let's get 50 wins before 30 losses.
Let's get 50 wins before 30 losses.
That would be nice, but I would also be content with getting 50 wins before we get 33 losses.I was thinking the same thing earlier today...
You can't gameplan around 4th quarter Fox.I'll give you that he's got his roster overachieving. I'll push back a bit on the Jokic/Cousins comparison. While I do think Malone and Cousins were a great match - I think Jokic would be succesful with any coach, while cousins needed a Ferrari mechanic - and even then we don't know if he would have stabilized long term.
Would have loved to see it though.
I remain very, very curious to see what Kessler could do on Jokic, yes, Jokic.
Lineup:
Fox
Davion
Kessler
Barnes
Sabonis
Kessler double teams on Jokic - Fox and Davion cover the permiter (KCP etc). Has Monte not created a machine that can cause problems for every contending team in the west?
Nuggs are Jokic pnr + shooters. You can gameplan against that. You can't gameplan against us though.
Who do you start if Hueter is out? Monk? Mitchell? Make Murray a SG, and start Lyles? Davis? Dellavedova?
Personally I say Start Monk, and give TD some minutes, or let Mitchell take the minutes. TD might be a bit rusty with lack of PT recently.
We all know Kessler has earned a spot in Browns rotation over TD. Solely based off his defense too. Crazy how that works....Brown has already shown that he doesn't want to change Monk's role, even with an injury. He'll probably start Davis and if that isn't working, go to Edwards.
There are teams that can potentially do it, but ... One of those teams just got torched for 40+ by Foxy so good luck with thatFor 3 quarters you have to shut down the Kings. If that doesn't work, you have to shut down Fox for the 4th quarter.
What team can do that in a 7 game series 4 times?
We all know Kessler has earned a spot in Browns rotation over TD. Solely based off his defense too. Crazy how that works....
Brown has already shown that he doesn't want to change Monk's role, even with an injury. He'll probably start Davis and if that isn't working, go to Edwards.