kb02
All-Star
That makes more sense if #4 is not involved. Barnes has a shorter contract, Collins is younger and better fits the core age wise with a longer contract. I have the two at roughly equal value.
Would Collins be a good fit here? I really don’t see how he solves our problems but his name keeps coming up and we saw that materialize with this FO before in Sabonis and DDV. Trusting Amick and this FO’s limited history I’m almost thinking Collins coming here is one of the more likely outcomes of any speculative offseason transaction or pick
IMO,. Fox was a better prospect coming out his Freshman year than Ivey is coming out his Sophomore year.
Only in our small lineups. Lyles, Metu, even Harkless were the "4". It's somewhat interchangeable, I just think we've got a better rotation at the 2 spot than we do at the 4 spot, that I'd slightly prefer Murray over Mathurin or similar 2/3.
Which is in his best usage, and in the Kings most consistent net ratings groups for 3 years running now.
Isn't that at least partially a function of those three really offering nothing on the offensive end? And if we wanted to go really small at times Murray could play small ball 5?Which is in his best usage, and in the Kings most consistent net ratings groups for 3 years running now.
Which would make the trade more of a straight 4 for 4 move and just in terms of pure 4 terms I think I'd prefer Collins as a player. That contract is a bit of a mood killer though.
Contract sucks but if that takes the place of our "big money signing next year" that's probably not too shabby. If we kept 4, we're probably shipping Barnes though?Which would make the trade more of a straight 4 for 4 move and just in terms of pure 4 terms I think I'd prefer Collins as a player. That contract is a bit of a mood killer though.
Isn't that at least partially a function of those three really offering nothing on the offensive end? And if we wanted to go really small at times Murray could play small ball 5?
I think part of the reason I favor Murray is because whether it is "3" when Barnes is a "4" or "4" when Barnes is a "3", that's 99% of the time the weak spot on the court.
Contract sucks but if that takes the place of our "big money signing next year" that's probably not too shabby. If we kept 4, we're probably shipping Barnes though?
Sucks for them that they'll be trading both of those assets with their 6th pick to us with Duarte for the 4th pick then.
I do not think they understand what a "haul" is.
Yeah, I thought the general consensus for the White trade was that Boston had pulled a fast one on the Spurs.
Vecenie's latest mock draft has us taking
4: Ivey
37: Wendell Moore (taken ahead of Procida, Peyton Watson, Josh Minott)
49: David Roddey (taken ahead of guys like Ziga Samar, Jabari Walker, Hugo Besson)
https://theathletic.com/3372782/2022/06/21/nba-mock-draft-rumors-updates-news/
Yeah, and then Boston learned shooting for the best of the mid rung available wasn't enough. Now they pay a premium for a decent role playing guard coming into a year where they won't be sneaking up on any teams late and who might not be injured at the most critical time of the year.
That would be a great 2nd round. I'm all about it.
Roddey's an incredibly fun player to watch (skilled 6'6" guys built like dump trucks who can ball are entertaining) but I'm really not sure how well he'll translate to the NBA as a guy too short to be a forward but too chunky to be a true wing.
Vecenie's latest mock draft has us taking
4: Ivey
37: Wendell Moore (taken ahead of Procida, Peyton Watson, Josh Minott)
49: David Roddey (taken ahead of guys like Ziga Samar, Jabari Walker, Hugo Besson)
https://theathletic.com/3372782/2022/06/21/nba-mock-draft-rumors-updates-news/
Moore at #37 is nutty. I'd love it, but can't see him falling down there. He should be off the board by the early 20s if even one GM around there is competent.
Get him with a nutritionist and a trainer to get him down to 220-225.Roddey's an incredibly fun player to watch (skilled 6'6" guys built like dump trucks who can ball are entertaining) but I'm really not sure how well he'll translate to the NBA as a guy too short to be a forward but too chunky to be a true wing.
Damn right! I've been letting them hear it every chance I get
I'm not the biggest Ivey fan, but I highly disagree. Ivey is stronger, bigger, more athletic, and can shoot the 3 ball. It's not even close to say that Ivey>>>Fox as a prospect. There's a reason why 5+ teams want to trade up for Ivey.IMO,. Fox was a better prospect coming out his Freshman year than Ivey is coming out his Sophomore year.
Naaaaaaaaaaaah...He's dropping a bit, to #4.Now watch Banchero go #1 to Orlando. Two days out and entire draft at this point one of the most unpredictable I've ever seen.
Naaaaaaaaaaaah...He's dropping a bit, to #4.
![]()