Fox sux though. I saw it on the websites.
Clarkson > Fox?
The tank is strong, good job Kings. I'm cool with Fox elevating his play down the stretch, maybe it will increase his market value this offseason.
The tank is strong, good job Kings. I'm cool with Fox elevating his play down the stretch, maybe it will increase his market value this offseason.
The Kings shouldn’t trade Fox. They need to surround him with legitimate NBA players that can shoot and play D. Clearly the Kings need to upgrade the rest of the roster and the coach. One player can’t carry a whole team to the playoffs.
Oh, so we are going to pretend that gaudy stats in March mean so much for the future success of the team that Monte should hang up the phone this offseason for anyone calling about Fox? I'm not even against Fox, but I'm down for the Kings to have as many options as they can to improve the team this offseason ...
Oh cool, glad you got it all figured out.If he's considering rebuilding then of course you do. But as is, you aren't getting an even trade back for Fox. Not at this level. If Monte was even considering rebuilding you don't make that Sabonis deal. You do the opposite.
Oh cool, glad you got it all figured out.
You'd think that someone who's cheered for the Kings as long as you have would know better than to say things like this.Between the draft and some of the trade pieces we have there is no way we can't solidify the two big gaps in our starting rotation...
Who are we trying to trade him for? Giannis?The tank is strong, good job Kings. I'm cool with Fox elevating his play down the stretch, maybe it will increase his market value this offseason.
And start over again?
View attachment 10973
Yeah, their history is that they will sign 2-3 mediocre free agents for above market value and be in the same exact position next March as they are every March.Yeah, it's called looking at the Kings typical history and learning from that vast array of mistakes.
ok that reads more optimistic than I intended. We definitely should be able to fill one via draft and hopefully hit the second in trade. I do think Monte is far better than we've had since Petrie actually made the calls. I'd say the Artest deal signalled a Maloofian takeover.You'd think that someone who's cheered for the Kings as long as you have would know better than to say things like this.
I get it, my post was dumb. Thanks for the ridicule and just move on.Who are we trying to trade him for? Giannis?
Yeah, their history is that they will sign 2-3 mediocre free agents for above market value and be in the same exact position next March as they are every March.
Wait. Where’s Jordan Clarkson on that list?
I just rewatched it. It was after a made basket with no time left. He can’t really argue it was a shot cuz the ball went through the hoop, he picked it up and just chucked it with it being inbounded.Uh, yeah. Pretty sure he was throwing it towards the other hoop even if it was someone angrily. lol.
I just rewatched it. It was after a made basket with no time left. He can’t really argue it was a shot cuz the ball went through the hoop, he picked it up and just chucked it with it being inbounded.
Why would he be he's like a 3rd option? He's busy helping the Jazz win games and getting ready for the playoffs.Wait. Where’s Jordan Clarkson on that list?
March is an important month. Everyone is playing for something, so, yea, this means a bit more to me.Oh, so we are going to pretend that gaudy stats in March mean so much for the future success of the team that Monte should hang up the phone this offseason for anyone calling about Fox? I'm not even against Fox, but I'm down for the Kings to have as many options as they can to improve the team this offseason ...