The Kings (who were already a lottery team) sat their best two players AND were without Richaun Holmes for the last part of the season. I'm not sure how much more of a tank job they can do. You can't actually tell players to throw games.
Actually, if there was one thing Vlade was actually good at as a GM, it was acquiring extra first round picks
I chose not to renew my Timbers tickets but they strong armed renewals to get cup finals tickets and then when another DV incident came to light they refunded anyone who asked (which is funny because they hung me out to dry last year when I had covid related concerns). I wouldn't be surprised if they are bracing for cancellations if Jackson is hired and probably will ultimately NOT hire him for that reason alone. Also basketball reasons.I've made one payment and didn't sign a contract, so ya, I'd even eat that payment.
I honestly cannot think of another potentially qualified human that I would less prefer.
Not playing Barnes 38min/game? You saw some of these lineups OKC for example threw out there. Nothing forced Kings to play Barnes and other vets. You dont tell players to lose games, you sit veteran players you have 5-10years worth of tape playing in the league and know what they are as players and play any young guys you can. Thats an extremely easy way to gain some draft position.
I value getting additional first round picks A LOT more than trading down with your own and getting one extra. Vlade got some for Cousins trade and one for Bellinelli but thats it. For a rebuilding team I expected a lot more and they would've been extremely beneficial for us. Considering Vlade had prime Cousins to trade, used 40million dollars worth of cap space on Zbo, Ghill and VC, made a horrible trade with philly where we lost draft capital and overall used cap space horribly, the amount of draft capital added was very small
I chose not to renew my Timbers tickets but they strong armed renewals to get cup finals tickets and then when another DV incident came to light they refunded anyone who asked (which is funny because they hung me out to dry last year when I had covid related concerns). I wouldn't be surprised if they are bracing for cancellations if Jackson is hired and probably will ultimately NOT hire him for that reason alone. Also basketball reasons.
Vlade was really bad at talent evaluation but also he was hamstrung by the stupid Casspi for Hickson deal that basically kept our first round picks out of our control for the whole decade. The Philly deal was really stupid but I also imagine if he could have just traded the 2016 pick for space he'd have done it without all the swaps and pick down the road.I would criticize just about everything about Vlade's tenure as GM, but the guy did fill a whole roster with first round picks. He had draft capital for days, he just didn't know how to use it. Obviously we know how things actually turned out but I think Vlade's strategy of supplementing young players with well-regarded vets every year could have worked with a better scouting department.
Portland hired an accused rapist while the beloved soccer teams are burning in the wake of sexual harassment and DV scandals so never put anything past them.
I think with Jackson it would come down to whether or not he convinces the owners that he isn't going to shove his religion down everyone's throats the way he apparently did in Golden State. He's hardly the one and only evangelical Christian in the league.
Walton's issues reeked like a set up. Usually when someone is bad there is a long trail (both of the Portland soccer incidents involved repeat offenders and cover ups by Portland's FO). I'd even say Billups stuff was so far in the past and he's been a model citizen he'd be an acceptable hire in about 25 NBA cities, but never this one.Walton had some legal issues hanging over his head as well right after the Kings hired him and Vivek didn't immediately pull the plug.
There are so many reasons to choose from: he has made intolerant comments, he alienated an entire franchises workforce, his last team got better once he left, he doesn't actually coach right now, just talks on the sideline and isn't particularly good at that, his 'change the gym locks' policy will not mesh well with Monte's 'share data with coaches' vibe he hangs his hat on.
If Jackson was serious about coaching, he would take an assistant role somewhere or coach at a lower level. If his personality prevents him from doing that then he belongs on ESPN.
focusing just on the basketball and interpersonal relations he should never have made it to the second cut let alone an in-person.There are so many reasons to choose from: he has made intolerant comments, he alienated an entire franchises workforce, his last team got better once he left, he doesn't actually coach right now, just talks on the sideline and isn't particularly good at that, his 'change the gym locks' policy will not mesh well with Monte's 'share data with coaches' vibe he hangs his hat on.
If Jackson was serious about coaching, he would take an assistant role somewhere or coach at a lower level. If his personality prevents him from doing that then he belongs on ESPN.
Not playing Barnes 38min/game? You saw some of these lineups OKC for example threw out there. Nothing forced Kings to play Barnes and other vets. You dont tell players to lose games, you sit veteran players you have 5-10years worth of tape playing in the league and know what they are as players and play any young guys you can. Thats an extremely easy way to gain some draft position.
Walton's issues reeked like a set up. Usually when someone is bad there is a long trail (both of the Portland soccer incidents involved repeat offenders and cover ups by Portland's FO). I'd even say Billups stuff was so far in the past and he's been a model citizen he'd be an acceptable hire in about 25 NBA cities, but never this one.
what I don't understand is why with Vivek's GS fetish if Lacob says he turned off everyone in the org Vivek would want anything to do with that. I'm sure Jackson says he's changed and he's learned from that and maybe it's even true but he hasn't applied himself as a basketball mind in the time since except as a commentator most people don't like either.Maybe the Walton thing was a setup. But we tend to believe the people we know or relate to better. Regardless of the truth.
Joe Lacob fired a coach who won 51 games and brought a team to the playoffs for the first time in whenever. Saying 200 people in the org didn't like Mark was an exaggeration, but he wanted to cover himself. Fans took it as fact. Media rolled with all the negatives because it made for a good story and that's what media does.
Jackson has had is issues, but I think the biggest turn off for people is indeed him putting his religious beliefs out there for all to see.
what I don't understand is why with Vivek's GS fetish if Lacob says he turned off everyone in the org Vivek would want anything to do with that. I'm sure Jackson says he's changed and he's learned from that and maybe it's even true but he hasn't applied himself as a basketball mind in the time since except as a commentator most people don't like either.
The Kings were 8-16 after the Sabonis trade. I'm sure if nothing else they were hoping to see Fox and Domas play together a bit to end the season. When that didn't happen they shut them down. Unfortunately for the tank, they ended up going 5-5 to finish the year. I'd say that was more about Mitchell than Barnes since Davion went for 20 & 10 during that stretch. Okay, 19.8 ppg and 10 apg.
But lets say the King went 0-10 in that same stretch. They'd be tied with Indiana for the 5th slot instead of the 7th. And they'd only have a 2.5% better chance of the # 1 pick and an 8% better chance of a top 4 pick in a relatively weak draft.
I'm not going to tell you not to be upset that they didn't tank hard enough. I'm just saying that for me, of all the terrible decisions the Kings have made during this long playoff drought, this one just doesn't bother me. Maybe I'll feel differently if the Pacers win the lottery. But I doubt it.
I would criticize just about everything about Vlade's tenure as GM, but the guy did fill a whole roster with first round picks. He had draft capital for days, he just didn't know how to use it. Obviously we know how things actually turned out but I think Vlade's strategy of supplementing young players with well-regarded vets every year could have worked with a better scouting department.
Vivek also left the Warriors ownership group relatively early into the Mark Jackson experience when the Warriors were suddenly in the playoffs for the first time in forever and probably doesn’t really remember/realize that improvement had more to do with Steph and Klay ascending into superstars and Draymond and Harrison Barnes being great complimentary pieces put into a functional (if not old fashioned) offense and defense by Mike Malone. He also wasn’t there for the span after we poached Mike Malone and the Warriors started to really struggle/stagnate under Mark Jackson.what I don't understand is why with Vivek's GS fetish if Lacob says he turned off everyone in the org Vivek would want anything to do with that. I'm sure Jackson says he's changed and he's learned from that and maybe it's even true but he hasn't applied himself as a basketball mind in the time since except as a commentator most people don't like either.
Just another thing that we could've done better to improve our odds to get better in the future that we didnt do. When these happen constantly, year after year multiple times a year its infuriating. We benefitted nothing from not sitting Barnes and others. We lost draft position. If I witness mistakes that this franchise makes I'm not just going to be ok with it because we have made worse mistakes in the past.
For me the context also matters. Do you see a generational talent at the top of this draft? I don't.
Yeah if there was a draft to not tank for, it would be this one. The three guys at the top are talented but they aren’t that much more talented than the next ten or so guys below them (in my opinion).For me the context also matters. Do you see a generational talent at the top of this draft? I don't.
honestly I see a lot of opportunities for a bad pick in the consensus top 4, so I am pretty fine if we wind up stuck at 7 and get a crack at Murray or Mathurin or whoever Monte sees in that second tier.For me the context also matters. Do you see a generational talent at the top of this draft? I don't.
honestly I see a lot of opportunities for a bad pick in the consensus top 4, so I am pretty fine if we wind up stuck at 7 and get a crack at Murray or Mathurin or whoever Monte sees in that second tier.
I'd love to be wrong about Chet but I don't think he has an NBA body and I also keep going back to one or two pictures where I started wondering if he was ever diagnosed with Marfan syndrome, so I've been very interested to hear when he takes his NBA physical if any irregularities are discovered with his heart.I think Chet could be close. If he answers the weight questions (Big if), he's as talented a basketball player that we've seen in a long time.
You’re a medical professional so I’m glad I’m not the only one who’s thought that about him (as a guy who is definitely not qualified to give medical opinions).I'd love to be wrong about Chet but I don't think he has an NBA body and I also keep going back to one or two pictures where I started wondering if he was ever diagnosed with Marfan syndrome, so I've been very interested to hear when he takes his NBA physical if any irregularities are discovered with his heart.
For me the context also matters. Do you see a generational talent at the top of this draft? I don't.
I'm an educator and not a doctor, but we do a Marfan case every year and there's a few photos that jumped out at me as the textbook photo we give to diagnose (along with the heart sounds). But yeah, that's the big reason I've been very reserved on Chet.You’re a medical professional so I’m glad I’m not the only one who’s thought that about him (as a guy who is definitely not qualified to give medical opinions).
Actually, if there was one thing Vlade was actually good at as a GM, it was acquiring extra first round picks
I dont bother to analyse drafts too closely if Kings arent drafting at the very top so hard to say yet. Either way better position gives you better odds, historically its a statistical fact. You also dont have to choose a player 6 teams passed on plus it gives you opportunities to trade down if you really evaluate the draft in a way that it doesnt matter if you draft 2nd or 7th. However I would never be happy with thinking "well we draft seventh because other teams managed to tank the rest of the season and we didnt but thats cool because in this draft the 7th best prospect is almost as good as the top 2-4".
To me us being 7th pre lottery was a choice, and a bad choice by us. The end of the season was literally meaningless. Draft position isnt meaningless. One could easily argue we should've started the tank way earlier to be in the race for a top 4 position. Of cource we didnt do that but at the very least there is no reason why Indiana and Portland should've got better position than us. It was a bad choice we made, hopefully we get very lucky in the lottery but its just a one example where our way of operating is queationable at best