It's interesting. The Kings are currently 14th in defensive rating. That's not great by any stretch of the imagination, but it's better than half the NBA, which is noteworthy considering the Kings haven't finished in the upper half of the league in defensive rating since, like, the W. Bush administration. It's almost impressive considering how bad the 3pt defense has been. It's like they've schemed it this way to see how they might coax an above average defense out of a team anchored by stars that aren't known for their defensive contributions. I don't really approve, because it's so back-breaking in the modern NBA to watch your opponent hit 3-pointer after 3-pointer while your own offense continually clangs them off the rim. When players get comfortable from outside early, they develop a rhythm they can sustain all game, which we've seen, as opposing teams are regularly shooting 40%+ against the Kings. Still, I'm curious if there will be any long-term dividends to the strategy. Even with the awful 3pt defense, it feels like the Kings would be a .600 or better team if their shooters would just hit at league average from beyond the arc. Keegan and Huerter just have to be better. Or Keon needs to get run as a starter and drill 38% consistently.