Telling the story about the direction the Kings are going wouldn't be boring, it would be fiction! This front office has floundered since the Bibby/C-Webb/Vlade days. There has been no consistency, no important free agents, no great draft picks before the last two who the jury is still out on. If you can see where this team is headed, you must have a mighty strong telescope! Because there have been national writers who have questioned the direction of this team. I have watched this team for a great many years and I see only 2 young possible stars and a collection of castaways from the league. A Bench of CBA players and no depth or veterans anywhere on the roster. Quite a foundation that Petrie has built! Most teams that compete and make the playoffs, and win tough games are NOT built with CBA players and castaways from other teams. They are built through the draft and thru free agency. The fact that this team has the LOWEST PAYROLL in the NBA is a sign that there is something wrong with the ownership of this team. Are the Golden Boy Maloofs running out of money? Their every move financially appears to be trying to stop the fact that they are bleeding money! Building a Las Vegas Casino in the midst of a depression was a very bad idea. They have lost millions there. Selling the Beer distributorship that their father made his millions on was troubling as well. The Kings are a terrible team that no one wants to go out and watch. They barely broke even by all accounts last season. I think the bottom line is that the Maloofs may have too many financial troubles to be able to focus any of their wealth on fixing what is wrong with the Kings. And they have held off spending any money on this team for a very long time! The fans have been promised for a long, long time that the financial moves they were making were to clear out cap space to build a winner. But what if they were clearing cap space just to clear it and save money?? We have watched a LOT of bad basketball because the Maloofs promised they would spend after the new CBA! And now they want to move the team out of town after inflicting us with some of the worst basketball in league history ??? Seriously? Was THAT the PLAN all along? People need to take a good long look at the overall history of this team and where they are headed. And for God's sake stop with the revisionist history! It is as it happened. And it has not been pretty. If you can see where this team is headed then perhaps you should call the Kings front office and LET them KNOW. I think that they are either clueless or are too busy getting the moving vans ready.
I think a financial distinction needs to be made here.
There is a difference between the spending power of an NBA owner, and the spending power that an NBA owner can use to help the team. Mikhail Prokhorov is worth around 15 billion dollars, but he has to abide by the rules of the CBA when it comes to spending money to make his team better.
The more adept you are at using the CBA rules to provide flexibility and decide deals the better shot you have at creating a competitive team. The Kings took advantage of the CBA and had a very high payroll when they were trying to win a championship, and now they have set themselves up to be the best positioned of all the teams out there, while having two young cornerstones to build around.
You have to trace everything back to Webber's knee. Typically a team pays super-star money for their super-stars and usually overpays a bit to keep the key cogs signed that you know work well with your star. (It's fine to overpay a player when you know that player gives you what you need when playing next to your cornerstone player. If that cornerstone player is no longer available, that's when you've got a big problem)
When Webber went down, that decimated both Petrie and the Maloof's long range goals on both being a championship contender and how to work the salary structure to hopefully go from a contending team to a rebuilding team.
They had so much salary tied up in guys that were not worth the cost when not surrounded by Webber, so their thought was that they were spending all this money anyway, they might as well spend a little bit more and see if they could be competitive. Of course, we all know that this was a mistake, and they should have just blown up the team, but they didn't because they are fans and they want to win.
All of this I'm writing just to basically say this. It takes time to clear off a lot of bad salary from your team, and while you're clearing off this salary, you're probably winning too many games and not getting great draft position. You say that they have been floundering with no great draft picks except the last two, but the simple fact is they were trying to get rid of over-paid players and they were too good to get good draft picks until the last two.
They had the 10th and 12th picks in the draft, and while those are decent spots, it's going to be very rare to find cornerstone players that far into the draft.
As far as your statement regarding how most teams build competitive teams through free-agency and the draft and not CBA cast-offs, you have to remember something.
I would guarantee you right now, that every owner in the league wishes they had the cap flexibility that the Maloofs have right now. The Owners are going to be pushing for something which limits player salaries, and the Maloofs are the Owners best positioned to take advantage of whatever terms are put together.
A major revamp of the CBA only comes once in a great while, so to be the best positioned to take advantage is a fabulous thing. Most teams don't build through 'CBA Cast-Offs' because there is hardly any opportunity to ever do so. You should be happy that the Maloofs have played this perfectly to be one of the teams who can.
Let me ask you a serious question.
The Detroit Pistons went and traded their star guard in Billups to the Denver Nuggets for a washed-up Allen Iverson. It wasn't a good trade from a talent perspective, but what it did was give the Pistons a massive expiring contract so they could begin to rebuild their team.
In the off-season the Pistons signed two players: Charlie Villanueva and Ben Gordon for about 17 million dollars.
Would you be happier going into next season with 17 million dollars more in cap flexibility, or have two mid-tier players who might cost you half the amount that you're now paying them if you'd waited for the new CBA comes into play?
I'm certain this is something that the Maloofs and Petrie have discussed over and over again, and as I doubt there have been any super-stars to pick up in free-agency or trade, the answer has always been to wait till after the CBA to make the best moves possible for the team.
If you disagree with their assessment, that's fine, but I happen to support that decision whole-heartedly.