Kings acquire Mfiondu Kabengele

Tetsujin

Tetsujin

The Game Thread Dude
#31
#31
Iced Espresso said:
What asset do you think we got here?
Click to expand...
Kabengele isn’t chopped liver. He really produced in G-league and has been buried so deep on the Clippers bench that we don’t know what he’s really capable of. Also I’d wager that the pick the Clippers are sending back to us is better than the one we sent to them.
 
S

sactowndog

All-Star
#34
#34
Tetsujin said:
Kabengele isn’t chopped liver. He really produced in G-league and has been buried so deep on the Clippers bench that we don’t know what he’s really capable of. Also I’d wager that the pick the Clippers are sending back to us is better than the one we sent to them.
Click to expand...
The one we sent is protected and likely won’t convey. It’s a good move, if you planned to play him.
 
S

sactowndog

All-Star
#37
#37
Iced Espresso said:
I mean the exception was going to expire, the seconds won't likely convey....

Whatever he is owed the rest of the year.......I mean Vivek may have just got a "free" 500k or million in cash for doing nothing. I don't blame him for this if that was the case.
Click to expand...
Is that true of the Clippers second or just the Kings? Woj’s tweet says just the Kings pick is protected.
 
Iced Espresso

Iced Espresso

Starter
#38
#38
sactowndog said:
Is that true of the Clippers second or just the Kings? Woj’s tweet says just the Kings pick is protected.
Click to expand...
Neither likely to convey man.

We need a body because of injuries, I'm pretty sure we did it for cash.

Why not either? Unless you could of squeezed out a meager asset using the TPE somewhere else today.
 
S

sactowndog

All-Star
#39
#39
Tetsujin said:
Right. The major issue, as it has been since last season, remains our head coach being absolutely incapable of playing anyone younger than 28 years old unless they’re so transcendently good that he has no choice.
Click to expand...
is that the head coach or an owner that thinks this team is capable of being a playoff team? You think it’s the former and I think it’s the head up his ass later.
 
S

sactowndog

All-Star
#40
#40
Iced Espresso said:
Neither likely to convey man.

We need a body because of injuries, I'm pretty sure we did it for cash.

Why not either? Unless you could of squeezed out a meager asset using the TPE somewhere else today.
Click to expand...
so I’m not doubting you but could you post a link that’s says that?

never mind I see the updated Woj tweet. Watching USC play and Isaiah Mobley looking good.
 
T

Turgenev

Starter
#42
#42
So we get a young guy who was a recent late first round pick and had fairly impressive defensive stats in the g league for nothing. Seems like a nice move.

The inability of our coach to utilise younger, less proven players consistently may limit the value of this acquisition.
 
iowamcnabb

iowamcnabb

All-Star
#43
#43
Turgenev said:
So we get a young guy who was a recent late first round pick and had fairly impressive defensive stats in the g league for nothing. Seems like a nice move.

The inability of our coach to utilise younger, less proven players consistently may limit the value of this acquisition.
Click to expand...
you have to figure minutes might be necessary soon. Belly probably gets traded, I won’t be shocked if Whiteside gets bought out. With Bagley and Metu hurt, Luke may be left with no choice. Then again I’ve been clamoring for Buddy to get some minutes at the five considering he is our best post defender.
 
T

Turgenev

Starter
#45
#45
iowamcnabb said:
you have to figure minutes might be necessary soon. Belly probably gets traded, I won’t be shocked if Whiteside gets bought out. With Bagley and Metu hurt, Luke may be left with no choice. Then again I’ve been clamoring for Buddy to get some minutes at the five considering he is our best post defender.
Click to expand...
That's true. Luke may be left with no choice. But until then I'm a cynic.
 
E

ESP47

All-Star
#48
#48
Iced Espresso said:
His option wasn't picked up from my understanding. So the max the Kings can offer if they like him next year should be what his option was.....

So if he does well here we likely lose him in FA.

I'm going to guess the cash considerations may be above his salary.
Click to expand...
Walton is coaching so he won't play anyway and won't even have a chance to break out.

This franchise is always one step ahead of the rest of the league.
 
V

vladtheimpaler

G-League
#51
#51
Tetsujin said:
All the one-and-dones have shifted the perspective so much that dudes are calling Bagley old at 22.
Click to expand...

i'd been meaning to ask this question:

"In the 'old days', when players generally entered the nba in their early 20's (21-23), it was generally agreed that a player's 'prime' was age 27-32 (or 26-31). But today, when the very best players enter the league at 19, what IS a player's 'prime' age?".
 
Telemachus

Telemachus

Starter
#52
#52
vladtheimpaler said:
i'd been meaning to ask this question:

"In the 'old days', when players generally entered the nba in their early 20's (21-23), it was generally agreed that a player's 'prime' was age 27-32 (or 26-31). But today, when the very best players enter the league at 19, what IS a player's 'prime' age?".
Click to expand...
It should still be about the same. The main reason men enter their prime around 26 or 27 is that is when their body finishes growing.
 
See_Hanks

See_Hanks

Bench
#54
#54
SacTownKid said:
That might be spilling the beans on a Whiteside/Bjelica buyout.
Click to expand...
No way. Kabengele won't see the floor in a Kings uniform for more than a couple minutes here and there. This was probably a favor. I wish they would play Whiteside more than they currently are. I don't get the logic behind not playing him much.
 
SacTownKid

SacTownKid

Hall of Famer
#55
#55
See_Hanks said:
No way. Kabengele won't see the floor in a Kings uniform for more than a couple minutes here and there. This was probably a favor. I wish they would play Whiteside more than they currently are. I don't get the logic behind not playing him much.
Click to expand...
You're probably right but there is still a chance, even if it sounds like a far off one, that Monte hits the reset at the deadline. There's enough chatter to make it appear as if it's at the very least on the table. They picked up Metu and played him so who knows if they do go down a few bigs because there's not a real need at some point.
 
Iced Espresso

Iced Espresso

Starter
#56
#56
Was pretty sure this was a cash grab.

CBS agrees.

17. Kings get Kabengele just so they can release him
The Clippers wanted to clear a roster spot and the Kings gladly obliged by taking on Kabengele -- who has played a grand total of 158 minutes in two NBA seasons -- picking up some cold, hard cash for their troubles. It was promptly reported that Kabengele would be released by the Kings after they acquired a few more players before the deadline. This move is about as insignificant as they come, but good on Sacramento for taking the free money.

https://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/...hort-heat-finesse-rockets-for-victor-oladipo/
 
M

mac

All-Star
#57
#57
Iced Espresso said:
Was pretty sure this was a cash grab.

CBS agrees.

17. Kings get Kabengele just so they can release him
The Clippers wanted to clear a roster spot and the Kings gladly obliged by taking on Kabengele -- who has played a grand total of 158 minutes in two NBA seasons -- picking up some cold, hard cash for their troubles. It was promptly reported that Kabengele would be released by the Kings after they acquired a few more players before the deadline. This move is about as insignificant as they come, but good on Sacramento for taking the free money.

https://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/...hort-heat-finesse-rockets-for-victor-oladipo/
Click to expand...
How does that work though? I assume the cash had to be less than his salary, or the Clippers would just waive him, and if not, why would we do it?
 
Iced Espresso

Iced Espresso

Starter
#58
#58
mac said:
How does that work though? I assume the cash had to be less than his salary, or the Clippers would just waive him, and if not, why would we do it?
Click to expand...
No they opened up a roster spot, and I'm pretty sure close to the hard cap.

To them giving us more loot than the remainder of his contract serves them better. Look for other buyouts etc then them bringing in someone they want instead.

Vivek does it to get cash for nothing, unless you think we could of used the TPE for an asset instead of cash.
 
M

mac

All-Star
#59
#59
Iced Espresso said:
No they opened up a roster spot, and I'm pretty sure close to the hard cap.

To them giving us more loot than the remainder of his contract serves them better. Look for other buyouts etc then them bringing in someone they want instead.

Vivek does it to get cash for nothing, unless you think we could of used the TPE for an asset instead of cash.
Click to expand...
If Clippers were just doing it for a roster spot couldn't they just waive him? Unless it was purely a cap situation but the cap impact of his salary is basically close to nothing.
 
Iced Espresso

Iced Espresso

Starter
#60
#60
mac said:
If Clippers were just doing it for a roster spot couldn't they just waive him? Unless it was purely a cap situation but the cap impact of his salary is basically close to nothing.
Click to expand...
You can't add even minimum salary if you are hard capped. I'm pretty sure they are hard capped or close to being so.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.