You might want to do a little more research. It was Joerger who started bringing Randolph off the bench at the end of his final season as head coach of Memphis. He even took some criticism for it if memory serves (Green wasn't quite ready yet).
Oh well that settles it....didnt know every fan had issues with his rotations. Not sure why Joerger just doesn't fan source the starting lineup and rotations.Yeah whoever called me out asking me to list what players Fizdale has implemented over Joerger's due to Joerger's obsession with vets I'd be more than happy to. It's funny how much people are jumping at Joerger criticism as if it's all nonsense, I lived in Tennessee, I followed the Grizzlies, every fan had issues with his rotations and vet obsession. This isn't something new.
Most notably was Zbo. When he started to decline, Joerger never entertained the idea of bringing him off the bench despite his defense and speed killing the starting unit, and he was a perfect bench spark... It took a new coach, who quickly moved Zbo to 6th man role.
Oh well that settles it....didnt know every fan had issues with his rotations. Not sure why Joerger just doesn't fan source the starting lineup and rotations.
This is correct. I just moved from Northern Alabama(Grizzlies and Hawks games on TV) to Colorado, because this is apparently important, but it was Joerger who asked (told) Z-Bo he would be more effective coming off the bench. I had figured it will be only a matter of time, pomp and circumstance etc, until the same happens here.You might want to do a little more research. It was Joerger who started bringing Randolph off the bench at the end of his final season as head coach of Memphis. He even took some criticism for it if memory serves (Green wasn't quite ready yet).
No dude, incorrect.You might want to do a little more research. It was Joerger who started bringing Randolph off the bench at the end of his final season as head coach of Memphis. He even took some criticism for it if memory serves (Green wasn't quite ready yet).
No, he didn't. Check Zbo's gamelog. Zbo played 68 games and started 53 of them. The games he came off the bench were in December and January for reasons I wouldn't know, after which he went back to starting and playing 30-35 minutes all the way to end of the season.
We are the 26th worst scoring team at 98.6 points a game.
But the abyss gets deep, Chicago is the worst in the league at 89.8
So as bad as we've been, there has been a few worse.
Sooooooo....is this thread going to be closed now?
He doesn't have to. He should use his two eyes and see the only thing this team has potential with is it's youth. As a coach wanting to win, it sucks, but it is what it is. If he's one of those coaches that thinks young players get better by not playing then lord help us.
Wait. What? You're saying Joerger doesn't know the potential of the team lies in the youth? Oh my gawd. Somebody call the press. Why hasn't anyone else figured this out?
You act as though he has no idea what he is doing, which is patently absurd. You also imply that he just wants to win, which is also absurd. He has made it incredibly clear that he has the task of figuring out how to best utilize our youth now and in the future. He's well aware he needs to help them be the most they can be, for both themselves and the Kings. He wants our young players to earn their time and not just be handed NBA minutes on a platter.
As someone else posted out a while back (I'm sorry whomever you are but I cannot remember at this moment), each of these kids are used to being winners. They've come up through the ranks and almost without exception been at the top of the list in terms of ability and potential. Now they've made it to the NBA, where they're running up against nothing but their peers and better. It's a tough lesson for them to learn. I personally trust Dave Joerger to do his best, along with the rest of his staff, to maximize their chances for success.
He didn't mess it up, but he didn't bring the needle any further because he ran basically an imitation of Hollins. The only difference was Hollins would get in Gasol's face if he got soft, Joerger didn't. I think Fizdale is trying to move the needle forward for them.People keep talking about what Joerger did in Memphis. He inherited a 50 win team that made it to the Western Conference Finals the year before he became head coach, all he had to do was NOT MESS IT UP, and he didn't.
hard to believe there are teams that are worse on offense than Sacramento right now. Utah has to be up there too, no?
Buddy goes 3-4 in the 1st quarter last night with 7 points, doesn't come back in until the 2nd half. Skal goes 4-6 with 11 points and plays 15 minutes.
This is ridiculous and has been happening every game. Don't give me the whole player development spiel, I have never in my life heard of a player starting the game, going 3-4 during his start, and not coming back until the 2nd half.
I'm sure somebody will mention his success in Memphis, he took over a team that was already making the playoffs every year with 50+ wins. It was due to all the vets he had who could still play, and carried the team (zbo, Marc Gasol, Conley, Allen, etc.).
I believe he's deliberately trying to lose games already, which is depressing.
I am curious what your thoughts are now? Buddy , Skal and all the young guys got to face a Playoff level starting unit last night. You saw the results.
Yeah, that's my point. Joerger didn't do much in Memphis.He didn't mess it up, but he didn't bring the needle any further because he ran basically an imitation of Hollins. The only difference was Hollins would get in Gasol's face if he got soft, Joerger didn't. I think Fizdale is trying to move the needle forward for them.
Yeah, that's my point. Joerger didn't do much in Memphis.
A top 3 PG? How so?I'm happy they started and I hope they continue to do so (even though I know they won't). It was 1 game, Fox's first career start, against a top 3 PG in the league, and against one of the top teams. It was ugly, but I would bet that's the worst game that starting unit would have.
Except for reaching the playoffs in every season and coaching the Grizzlies through some hard fought series.
From my point of view Joerger altered the Grizzlies playstyle quite a bit after Hollins. Where Hollins ran a pretty stagnant post offense with some high low plays, Joerger gradually increased the amount of pick and rolls every year and relied more on horn plays. Conley really grew into the player he is know under Joerger.
I understand some of the criticism. Im not a fan of the current Kings offense. I also think Joerger has a tendency to be loyal to a fault towards certain core players.
But the dude knows a thing or two about coaching defense and is a decent overall Nba coach.
Let's not get carried away, because our young players failed miserably against a good Wizards team.
Do you believe these stats equal automatic overall ranking?
The point was he inherited success more than created any. I don't think it's too much to ask for a NBA coach to make the playoffs with the same team that made the WCF the year before..
Stats are only one way to judge a player comparison there are alot of variables. Take those players on your list and have an expansion type draft wall probably goes 4th behind irving but could easily go 5th behind Conley or Lillard.