Interesting Bonzi article...

SacTownKid

Hall of Famer
I saw this on Hoopshype, I don't know if this has been posted yet.

http://www.oregonlive.com/oregonian/index.ssf




Wells changes scenery, but not attitude
Wednesday, July 27, 2005

Flashback. Dec. 2003. The concrete tunnel inside The Pyramid Arena in Memphis, Tenn.

I'd been dispatched to write a column about Bonzi Wells' first day on the new job, and bumped into him as he was arriving and looking for the Memphis Grizzlies' locker room.

Already, Wells seemed like a refreshed, changed man.

"Hi Bonzi," I said.

"You're a punk (expletive) (expletive)," he said.

What followed was a brief conversation about journalism and basketball. And Wells explained how he was going to turn over a new leaf and prove to everyone that Portland -- "not Bonzi" -- was the problem.

Wells finished last season suspended by Memphis coach Mike Fratello, who advised Wells that if he tried to come to the Grizzlies' final game of the season he would be arrested for trespassing.

Now Wells is being traded to Sacramento as part of a deal that will send the Kings' Bobby Jackson and Utah's Kirk Snyder, Raul Lopez and Curtis Borchardt to Memphis.

An acceptable risk, Sacramento is thinking.

A wonderful trade, Memphis is thinking.

Hey, we only got Wesley Person and a draft pick, you're thinking.

The temptation will be to hold up what Grizzlies President Jerry West and general manager Dick Versace just received in exchange for Wells and compare it to the Trail Blazers got for Wells in Dec. 2003. The temptation will be to say something like, "Man, we knew that West was good, but. . . ."

But you just can't do that to yourself.

The trade back then wasn't about talent. It wasn't even about a franchise giving up on a young, talented player. It was simply about cutting away rotting bait. And even though Blazers management has made mistakes, jettisoning Wells wasn't one of them.

To understand what the Blazers were thinking 19 months ago, you're going to have to come with me into the concrete tunnel of general manager John Nash's mind.

Back then, Nash still was new on the job. He was under building pressure to do something. And Wells, prone to spitting and gesturing, had just unleashed a tirade for the fourth time at then-coach Maurice Cheeks.

The Cheeks-Wells relationship was irreparable, and the whole league knew it. The Blazers were losing games. And season-ticket holders and corporate sponsors were fed up with Wells.

Nash was told to trade Wells, but he also was under a directive to not take any long-term contracts in return. As a result, Nash basically had zero leverage and minimal flexibility when he was dispatched to make his first big trade.

Nash will tell you that Dallas discussed getting involved with a "bigger version" of the eventual trade with Memphis. But that three-team deal would have stuck Portland with Raef LaFrentz's contract, which even now still has four years and roughly $46 million left on it.

The team was left with three choices: A) Deal with Memphis; B) Deal with Memphis and Dallas; or C) Deal with Bonzi.

They chose A -- the wise choice.

The Blazers drafted Sergei Monia in 2004 to complete the Wells trade. And if Monia never plays a single important minute, the trade was still a good one because it wiped away Wells' tantrums, influence and salary.

Maybe you wish Wells finally would understand that the changing scenery isn't just a new chance to exploit a fresh pack of suckers. If so, you're wasting your time. Because he believes "Turn over a new leaf" means "It'll take them 18 months to figure me out."

The day Wells was traded, teammate Rasheed Wallace turned to him at Blazers' practice and sang the television theme song to "The Jeffersons."

"Moving on up . . ." Wallace crowed across the gym.

That tune is all yours, Sacramento.

Right after you trade him, too.

John Canzano: 503-294-5065; JohnCanzano@aol.com; to read his Web log, go to www.oregonlive.com/canzano/


-------------------------------------------------------------------------





Is it just me or does this guy sound like a punk (expletive) (expletive) :D
 
Last edited:
it just you. sacramento has dealt with problem children before.
 
thesanityannex said:
it just you. sacramento has dealt with problem children before.

I was talking about the WRITER!!! Not Bonzi!

Bonzi will show them next year! I am counting on it.
 
Bonzi and Hart, together at last???


0105-bobcats.jpg




......sorry sactown, didn't know you were talking about the writer.
 
Even if this writer is correct, he still missed one critical part of this story. Bonzi is in the last year of his contract. If he does let us down, he walks. No big deal, we're back where we were this offseason with Cuttino. This is a measured move and substantially less risky than what Memphis did in aquiring him.
 
captain bill said:
Even if this writer is correct, he still missed one critical part of this story. Bonzi is in the last year of his contract. If he does let us down, he walks. No big deal, we're back where we were this offseason with Cuttino. This is a measured move and substantially less risky than what Memphis did in aquiring him.

That and for the first season in Memphis Bonzi did really well. If we choose we have Bonzi for at most 1 season. Can deal him at the deadline also.

I have a feeling we won't be looking to deal Bonzi however...;)
 
This guy(the writer) was just on KHTK this afternoon and actually sounded pretty intellegent and credible to me. He def knew Bonzi better and more intimately than any of us do. Bobby and Tags contracts were expiring after this year anyway too so I'm not sure whats up with that argument, either way with Tag and Bobby or with Bonzi it was a gamble, hopefully Petrie put his money on the right man. Bobby is in a contract year too, a big one, and I'd be willing to bet a lot he will respond with force. Course Bonzi may have more character and heart than Bobby does...
 
I think there is a strong chance Bonzi will play more games than the rest of the players involved in the trade combined. If Feburary rolls around and Bonzi is doing well but maybe not really working out off the court, he'll be more tradeable than Ostertag or Jackson would've been.
 
Kev.in said:
I think there is a strong chance Bonzi will play more games than the rest of the players involved in the trade combined. If Feburary rolls around and Bonzi is doing well but maybe not really working out off the court, he'll be more tradeable than Ostertag or Jackson would've been.
Jackson is healthy right now and none of his injuries are lingering or should still have an effect on his game. Like I said this is a huge year for Bobby and his family, just as big as it is for Bonzi, Bobby will respond. He can score inside and out is a great rebounder and a clutch shooter not to mention all out energy and a game changer he'll avg at least 12-15 pts and close to 5 rebs if he plays signifigant mins as a starter. Not to mention make Memphis a better team.
 
Didn't Jackson go into each of the last 3 seasons all healed up and injury free? And he came out playing 59, 50 and then 25 games in those seasons.

Jackson has never had problems with nagging injuries. They're always acute trauma caused mostly by contact with other players. This season he ran into a defender in Denver and hurt his wrist, then hit it again and tore the weakened ligaments. The year before that, he strained his abdominals, tried to come back too soon and it didn't heal up in time for him to return.
Season before that, he ran face first into Raef LaFrentz's shoulder during the playoffs and broke his eye orbit. Earlier in that season, Shaq hacked him across the hand trying to steal the ball and gave him a fractured knuckle for Christmas.

The question isn't whether Bobby will respond, he obviously will have at least one great month, the question is when he'll get that serious injury - the broken bone or torn ligament that puts him out for 3 months. If Bobby plays 70+ games for Memphis, then I guess we have to say Sacramento is hopelessly cursed to be struck by injury after injury.
 
Bobby is getting old. Contract year or not, his time is coming to an end. Gotta go with the young guy who patches a major hole for you. Doesn't mean Bonzi will work out -- in fact could really blow up on us. But its a good risk for a team in our position.
 
I listened to the interview with the reporter on KHTK, also. Pretty hair-curling stories about Wells back to his high school days. He said he "guaranteed" there WILL be an incident this year. He did agree that these things might work in the Kings favor (1) Its a contract year for Wells, and any more blow-ups are likely to end his career in the NBA (nobody will want him) (2) he is likely to get the playing time he wants (altho that reeks of not being a "team" player to me) and (3) ET is friends with him and knows Bonzi well and maybe that will help. Finally, if it doesn't work, we're not committed beyond this season.

But he sure did not seem to think it was a good bet that Wells will change. But, let's face it, Bonzi and the others left a really bad taste in the mouths of Portland fans. Can't say I blame any of them, including this reporter, for being bitter and disbelieving.

Still, I think it is worth a shot for the Kings. If he could keep his head together, he could be a very good player. And we did not lose much to get him (I mean in the basketball sense...I hated to see Bobby J go. What a great guy and teammate. :( )
 
If Bonzi can't play for RA, an aknowledged "Players Coach", then his time in the league will definately be on the wane. Since RA doesn't demand discipline Bonzi should be right up his alley.
 
That makes me think he probably will produce quite well and his value as a player will go up. Who knows how much. Enough for us to package him with a solid bench player in exchange for a borderline/developing star player?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top