Bricklayer
Don't Make Me Use The Bat
DMC for Brooklyn pick, Bradley and Kelly O
Rudy for whatever we can get for him
We have an If-You're-Going-To-Be-An-Idiot-And-Trade-Boogie thread in the personnel forum. Let's keep it there.
DMC for Brooklyn pick, Bradley and Kelly O
Rudy for whatever we can get for him
I wouldn't absolutely never trade Cousins 'cause you should never say never. But the offer would have to be SO outlandishly out of the park, can't refuse type of deal that if offered you would have to ask why they would offer such a deal. Unless of course he demands a trade and then we're screwed.We have an If-You're-Going-To-Be-An-Idiot-And-Trade-Boogie thread in the personnel forum. Let's keep it there.
We have an If-You're-Going-To-Be-An-Idiot-And-Trade-Boogie thread in the personnel forum. Let's keep it there.
Absolutely shoved it right to them with that legendary 9-6 record
Amazing
So have you been watching the Kings the past 10 years? If so I find it hard to believe you would discount what Malone did so easily.
DMC for Brooklyn pick, Bradley and Kelly O
Rudy for whatever we can get for him
In short I don't see a fix.
Short of this team getting some heart and the players being on the same page with their coach leading to an improbable playoff run I can't see a better team next year.
I see either a complete tear down (if Cousins is dealt Gay has to be because he's inefficient to the point of being a detriment as a primary option and Rondo would almost certainly not resign without them - and isn't valuable without high level players around him) or I see this same team wallowing in mediocrity either with Karl at the helm or yet another new coach with yet another new system
That is the fix. It may not be a palatable fix to anyone who has invested heart and soul into a Cousins' team and who saw championships dancing in his head, but it is a fix. The alternative is a long period of opportunities lost. The alternative would be years of putting off the inevitable, wandering aimlessly in limbo-land. I'd rather suck it up and take my medicine now rather than later.
You really could have stopped right there. I keep hearing people on this, "Well, it's not like we'd be playing 4-on-5; we're going to get somebody good back for Cousins!" And, I'm like, have you not been following this team for the last thirty years? Why would anybody ever believe that? When's the last time we traded a talented player in their prime, and it worked out for us?But that's not a fix. It's a gamble on POSSIBLY having a fix. Because unless the team drafts a superstar (or a couple all-stars) it will just be another cycle of losing for the Sacramento Kings.
You really could have stopped right there. I keep hearing people on this, "Well, it's not like we'd be playing 4-on-5; we're going to get somebody good back for Cousins!" And, I'm like, have you not been following this team for the last thirty years? Why would anybody ever believe that? When's the last time we traded a talented player in their prime, and it worked out for us?
But that's not a fix. It's a gamble on POSSIBLY having a fix. Because unless the team drafts a superstar (or a couple all-stars) it will just be another cycle of losing for the Sacramento Kings.
Nik Stauskas, Ben McLemore, Thomas Robinson and Jimmer Fredette are what the Kings have to show for four out of their last five lottery picks (#8, #7, #5 and #7 respectively) and we only have to look to the Sixers who have been doing the mother of all teardowns and tank jobs in attempting to rebuild and all they currently have to show for it is two NBA starter quality talents that don't mesh in Noel and Okafor and the hope for a player who hasn't played a second for them in two seasons who also doesn't have a game that will mesh well with their other two young bigs.
So the Kings trade away Cousins, Gay and Rondo (who won't net much given his pending free agent status) for draft picks & young players and/or expiring contracts and hope for the best in the lottery? It'd keep Chicago from getting the Kings first rounder I'm guessing (it becomes a 2nd rounder in 2018) but would mean the pick swaps with Philly could actually end up meaning something (Kings can't possibly have the #1 pick for the next two years) and that 2018 or 2019 first rounder will probably end up being a painfully high pick.
Unless this current group suddenly figures things out it doesn't really matter whether the Kings blow it up and rebuild or ride this out and rebuild - it's going to be a long time wandering aimlessly in limbo-land.
Richmond was past his prime, Webber was, too.Given that we traded Richmond after his age-32 season you might say he wasn't in his prime. I'd argue that Webber wasn't in his prime when we traded him either. So I guess it depends on what you consider to be a "talented player in his prime" - we may not have traded very many at all.
Does Jason Williams count? I'd say that worked out.
Does Peja count? That ended up being kind of a push.
Does Hedo count? I think that worked out too. Miller's career wasn't as long but he was a huge piece for that team.
Outside of that, who am I missing since the '98 resurgence? I suppose you could count Tyreke and IT, but both of those were sign-and-trades, technically trades but in reality "letting a guy walk in free agency and getting a few cookies out of it".
No, the limbo-land will last MUCH longer than not cutting the cord this year. There's not a decision made in basketball that isn't a gamble, one in which there is risk associated with it. There may be more or less risk, but risk nonetheless. There is also risk with doing nothing. Anyway you look at it there is a "gamble." We could look at past drafts with previous GMs, but that doesn't do much for an analysis with a new cast of character making those decisions. One has to hope that future draft decisions will be on par with those of other good small market teams. If not, then we don't have the right guys making those decisions, and that's a story for another day.
Richmond was past his prime, Webber was, too.
And, if it helps clear up your confusion, when I'm talking about "talented" players, the baseline that I'm starting from is going to be, like, Theus. Anybody below that line, like a Jason Williams, isn't good enough to qualify for this conversation, AFAIC. So no, to answer your questions, Williams doesn't count, because he wasn't the caliber of player that I'm talking about. From my point of view, I wouldn't count Jason Williams any more than I would count Walt Williams. Stojakovic doesn't count, because his best years were already behind him, whether you want to argue that there is some immutable line that defines a player's prime or not. And Turkoglu doesn't count for two reasons: 1) He hadn't entered his prime yet; that was more of a case of us trading a prospect for a proven player, and 2) We didn't really do any better without Turkoglu than we did with him; Miller was a good player for us, but it would be a stretch to say that it "worked out," in any results-based argument.
When's the last time we traded a talented player in their prime, and it worked out for us?
So in this scenario, what are you trading Cousins, Gay, Rondo and perhaps Bellinelli, Collison, McLemore & Koufos for?