Hollinger rates Kings improvement

Yep. It's the right place. And, since it's a free preview, we can reproduce it here since you already posted the link.

Thanks, BTW.

:)
 
2007-08 outlook: Who's improved thanks to offseason moves?
by John Hollinger, ESPN Insider

Improvement. That's the name of the game in the offseason, and it comes in all shapes and sizes. Teams can get better in a variety of ways -- through holdover players raising their games, through trimming dead wood from the previous season's roster, or by adding talent through the draft, trades or free agency. And sometimes, it doesn't even take any of that -- it just takes a different general on the sidelines pulling it all together.

But one thing remains constant: Standing pat is a formula for failure. In a business in which careers tend to be brief, it's imperative to constantly bring in new blood. Just ask the Miami Heat, who were so giddy about winning a championship in 2006 that they brought back the same roster last season -- and watched their aging crew fail to win a single playoff game in one of the weaker title defenses in league history.

Fortunately, half of the league's teams have made additions to their rosters that should prove quite helpful in the coming season, and that's the group I'll be discussing today. While not all of these moves were in the teams' best long-term interests ($24 million for Jason Kapono!?!?!?), what I want to do today is focus on how those maneuvers affect each team for this coming season in particular.

And if we're only looking at the upcoming season, even a fairly reckless move can have positive short-term effects.

With that as the background, here's a midsummer update showing the teams that have made themselves more formidable than they were a year ago:

(Major additions and subtractions are given in parentheses)


1. Houston Rockets
(added Mike James, Luis Scola, Jackie Butler and Aaron Brooks; lost Juwan Howard and Vassilis Spanoulis; replaced Jeff Van Gundy with Rick Adelman)

While you're focusing on the San Antonio-Dallas-Phoenix triumvirate in the West, don't sleep on Houston. The Rockets have quietly put together a roster that very well could be the last team standing in the Western Conference in 2008.

Start with the decision to replace Van Gundy with Adelman -- a change in direction that will likely make the team more up-tempo and offensive-minded. They'll miss Van Gundy's defensive genius, but given the offensive stagnation this club showed in 2006-07, it's not a bad trade.

Moreover, hiring Adelman was especially important in this case because it basically adds another player to the roster. Bonzi Wells bristled under Van Gundy after showing up out of shape, and hardly played last season. But he seems excited by being reunited with Adelman, who coached him to a strong campaign in Sacramento two years ago.

From there, add in two vastly underrated trades. The first one pilfered James from Minnesota for Howard, giving the Rockets a do-over on the disastrous James-for-Rafer Alston trade two years ago. The second nabbed Scola and Butler from San Antonio in return for Spanoulis.

Scola, a skilled Argentinian who has been one of the best players in Europe for the past half-decade, will make an immediate impact as a starting power forward. Butler, as a young center with strong scoring skills in the post, should energize a second unit that was bereft of offense last season.

In the big picture, the Rockets aggressively addressed their three main problems: stagant offense, point guard and power forward. Between the coaching change, the additions of James and first-round pick Aaron Brooks at the point, the pickups of Scola and Butler up front, and the de facto addition of Wells, this team suddenly looks loaded. At this point in the offseason, nobody has upgraded more than this club.


2. Charlotte Bobcats
(added Jason Richardson and Jared Dudley; lost Brevin Knight; replaced Bernie Bickerstaff with Sam Vincent)

While cynics will claim that frugal Bobcats owner Robert Johnson only signed off on the Richardson deal because he had to get over the minimum salary floor, there's no question that the deal addressed a huge weakness that has plagued the Cats throughout their existence.

Richardson is a reliable scorer and rebounder -- one that will help push rookie bust Adam Morrison out of the rotation if he struggles again -- and gives the Bobcats a much-needed go-to guy late in games. It also allows sharpshooter Matt Carroll to shift to a more suitable sixth-man role, in which his defensive shortcomings won't be so glaring. As a late first-rounder, Dudley could be surprisingly effective too -- don't be shocked if he's earning important minutes by season's end. Add it up and a playoff run doesn't seem far-fetched at all.


3. Phoenix Suns
(added Grant Hill, Alando Tucker; lost James Jones)

The Suns sold one of their first-round draft picks (uh-gain) but they also used one to grab Tucker, a tweener who should be able to fill in a lot of the minutes played by Jones. But their big grab was Hill, who is as brittle as they come but still a star when he's healthy enough to go.

He should thrive in Phoenix's running game and take over Boris Diaw's role as the de facto point man when Steve Nash is out of the game. Plus, his willingness to sign on the cheap means the Suns might not be done maneuvering just yet. After four decades they're still looking for a title in the Valley of the Sun; Hill might be the guy to get them over the top.


4. New York Knicks
(added Zach Randolph, Wilson Chandler, Dan Dickau and Fred Jones; lost Steve Francis and Channing Frye)

I'd rank this higher if I had any faith in the ability of Curry and Randolph to defend with even a smidgen of enthusiasm or competence, but I don't. The two will combine to give the Knicks the league's most defensively disinterested frontcourt, and that should put them in the bottom five or so in defensive efficiency.

But offensively, the Knicks might be good enough to play .500 ball anyway. Randolph is a beast in the post, and he can play the high post and float in his feathery left-handed jumper if he needs to clear the lane for Curry. Adding Chandler, Dickau and Jones also helps in the depth department, especially if it gives Isiah Thomas the stones to finally cut Jerome James.

However, the Randolph deal didn't help the Knicks nearly as much as it did the rest of the league, who now can rejoice in several more years of expected luxury tax payments from Zeke's spendthrift regime.


5. Atlanta Hawks
(added Al Horford, Acie Law)

Throw in two more lottery picks to a cast that already includes rising stars Joe Johnson and Josh Smith, and suddenly the Hawks look a lot more like a real basketball team. Horford was one of the top talents in an extremely strong draft, and at his size he'll probably be able to play some center -- a spot where the Hawks have been badly undermanned in the past.

I'm less bullish on Law's prospects, but he can't be any worse than the gang that manned the point for Atlanta last season. As with Charlotte, it's possible this team's lottery days are coming to an end. Too bad nobody will be in the stands to see it.


6. Boston Celtics
(added Ray Allen; lost Wally Szczerbiak and Delonte West)

Long-term, I have grave doubts about whether this was the right move for Boston; as I've mentioned before, unless they're about to use Gerald Green and Theo Ratliff's expiring contract as bait to bring in another star, I hardly see the point of acquiring Allen.

But in the short-term, Allen will be a big upgrade on the Wally/West combo that manned a lot of the shooting guard minutes for Boston last season, and that should be enough to pull the C's out of the cellar in the Atlantic.


7. Memphis Grizzlies
(added Mike Conley, Darko Milicic; lost Chucky Atkins; replaced Tony Barone with Marc Iavaroni)

The Grizzlies added two coveted young talents in Conley and Milicic, with the latter being hugely important because of the lack of a dependable frontcourt sidekick for Pau Gasol. Conley also figures to make an impact, but given his youth, it may come more in future seasons than the present.

Besides, he's filling some big shoes: Unbeknownst to many, Atkins played out of his mind a year ago. Conley will be hard-pressed just to match those numbers this season, let alone exceed them. But with these two additions, Grizz fans at least can see some light at the end of the tunnel.

cont.
 
8. Washington Wizards
(added Nick Young, Oleksiy Pecherov; likely to add Juan Carlos Navarro)

Can it be? Do the Wizards finally have a bench? Adding three young players to the mix (their last two first-round picks plus whomever they trade for Navarro) certainly makes last season's feeble second unit seem much more imposing for this go-round.

As those who read my draft preview know, I'm hugely skeptical of Young. But if all he has to do is improve upon Roger Mason Jr.'s play last season, I'm guessing he can handle that. Similarly, Pecherov is something of a mystery meat, but he can't be any worse than Jarvis Hayes was last season. And Navarro will be a solid No. 3 guard wherever he ends up, though right now the Wizards seem intent on a trade.


9. New Orleans Hornets
(added Morris Peterson, Julian Wright)

The Hornets filled their hole at the wings with free agent Peterson and first-rounder Wright, who should be a big upgrade on the Rasual Butler/Desmond Mason combo that filled the slot last season.

Peterson gives the team a legit perimeter threat, something it lacked a year ago once Peja Stojakovic went on the shelf, while Wright's all-around game should provide a nice complement off the bench. Between those two and Peja's return, the Hornets impotent offense of a year ago should be a thing of the past.


10. Sacramento Kings
(added Spencer Hawes and Mikki Moore; replaced coach Eric Musselman with Reggie Theus)

I have no idea if Theus can coach or not, and I think Musselman could do a pretty good job in the right situation. But nobody doubts that the wheels were coming off by the end of last season and that a change would be for the better, so in this case the Mussleman-for-Theus swap should be for the better.

Moreover, the Kings addressed their horrid frontcourt by adding two centers in Hawes and Moore. Neither is going to be great, but right now the Kings will settle for "adequate," especially given the price they paid. These moves may not keep them out of the lottery, but it will at least help stop the bleeding.


11. Los Angeles Lakers
(added Javaris Crittenton, Derek Fisher)

I'm not sure if this is enough to make Kobe rescind his trade demand, but it helps. The Lakers point guards were disastrous last season, so adding the veteran Fisher to take over for Smush Parker should pay immediate dividends (although the Lakers overpaid and will hate themselves for this two years from now, that's in the future -- remember, we're just looking at the impacts for 2007-08 today).

Crittenton was supposed to be a long-range pick, but he played well enough in summer league that folks may reconsider that position -- especially since at 6-foot-5, he has the size that Phil Jackson craves in the backcourt.


12. Chicago Bulls
(added Joakim Noah and Joe Smith; lost P.J. Brown)

Maybe power forward isn't the weak spot on the roster anymore. Already possessing a promising stud at the position in Tyrus Thomas, the Bulls added the energy of Noah and the veteran smarts of Smith to their roster, shoring up a spot manned by a fading Brown last season. No, none of these guys can score in the post, which is where the Bulls really could use help, but they'll add another jolt of energy to the frontcourt. Plus, they give Chicago yet more assets to throw into a trade for the likes of Kevin Garnett or Pau Gasol.


13. Toronto Raptors
(added Maceo Baston and Jason Kapono; lost Morris Peterson)

Kapono might not even be as good as Mo Pete, the man whose spot he takes at greater expense. But the big picture in Toronto is that they have three deadly shooters surrounding T.J. Ford and Chris Bosh, so defending the latter two on the pick-and-roll will be a pick-your-poison proposition. Additionally, the more important comparison was improving on Joey Graham -- who inexplicably became the starter last season after the team soured on Peterson -- and Kapono is more than up to that challenge.

In the meantime, don't sleep on Baston. The former Michigan star was a Euroleague stalwart for several years but didn't get a chance to show his goods in Indiana. That's likely to change in Toronto this season, where he'll provide an inexpensive source of frontcourt offense off the pine.


14. Detroit Pistons
(added Rodney Stuckey and Arron Afflalo)

I'm not sold on Afflalo at all, but Stuckey looks like the real deal, and should give Detroit a second-unit guard who can actually score once in awhile. After watching Flip Murray and Lindsey Hunter hoist brick after brick the past two seasons, Pistons fans are going to think this guy is the second coming of Dave Bing.

15. Philadelphia 76ers
(added Thaddeus Young and Jason Smith; lost Joe Smith)

Joe Smith was one of the keys to the Sixers' strong second-half run last season, so losing him leaves a dent. On the other hand, they added two first-round picks in Young and Jason Smith, and my guess is the contributions of those two will offset what has been lost.

Not that you'll see much difference in the win column -- I suspect the Sixers will be terrible -- but these moves didn't make the news any worse. Given some of the previous offseason maneuvers by the Billy King regime, that's a victory in itself.

John Hollinger writes for ESPN Insider.
 
I was surprised to see the Kings on that list at all. I mean the Hawes pick wasn't bad, but I don't think Mikki Moore does anything to help really. But who grades offseasons in the middle of it? Timing is a little off.
 
I agree with allrightythen. It's too early in the offseason to predict how the Kings are going to perform in the upcoming season. You never know what's going to happen, in fact, IMHO I think you can never truly have an accurate picture of what is going to happen in an NBA season. For example, who would of thought the Cavs were going up against the Spurs in 2007 NBA Finals.
 
It doesnt surprise me that we're on the list...I'd assume that we'd be even higher if we traded Ron Artest...because after all, he's the cancer that's holding us back on the court with his felonious antics(according to every member of the media, that is:D) Oh, and by the way VF, 'Information Ninja'....NICE!!:p
 
Apparently Holinger must think 2/3 of the league has really sucked this offseason -- that is about as unenthusiastic a writeup for us at #10 as you could imagine. And where is Portland BTW? In fact the whole list has a bit of random to it, although I have been watching the steady accumulation of talent over in Houston with interest. You give a guy like Rick that many talented pieces, and with a little health they are going ot be all kinds of dangerous.
 
Apparently Holinger must think 2/3 of the league has really sucked this offseason -- that is about as unenthusiastic a writeup for us at #10 as you could imagine. And where is Portland BTW? In fact the whole list has a bit of random to it, although I have been watching the steady accumulation of talent over in Houston with interest. You give a guy like Rick that many talented pieces, and with a little health they are going ot be all kinds of dangerous.

The list was based on how thing are affected for only the 07-08 season. So he probly thinks that losing Zach Randolph offsets the Oden, Frye, and Blake pickups. Randolph had a pretty monster year last year so I can see the logic.
 
...I have been watching the steady accumulation of talent over in Houston with interest. You give a guy like Rick that many talented pieces, and with a little health they are going ot be all kinds of dangerous.

If Houston Rockets fans aren't getting tingly, they haven't been paying attention. What better revenge for Adelman - served nice and cold - than to win the WC and perhaps even the whole enchilada? Keeping healthy will be the key, of course, but there's finally a team from Texas I don't hate.

:)
 
If Houston Rockets fans aren't getting tingly, they haven't been paying attention. What better revenge for Adelman - served nice and cold - than to win the WC and perhaps even the whole enchilada? Keeping healthy will be the key, of course, but there's finally a team from Texas I don't hate.

:)

Since it does not appear likely that we are going to win it all this year, I would LOVE for Rick to get a ring!!!
 
Apparently Holinger must think 2/3 of the league has really sucked this offseason -- that is about as unenthusiastic a writeup for us at #10 as you could imagine. And where is Portland BTW? In fact the whole list has a bit of random to it, although I have been watching the steady accumulation of talent over in Houston with interest. You give a guy like Rick that many talented pieces, and with a little health they are going ot be all kinds of dangerous.

I completely agree with you - Rick seems to be in that elite class of NBA coach who always seems to get the most of his talent and overachieve by 5-10 games - I mean, did the 2005-2006 kings have any business going 44-38? Muss took the same team and did much, much worse.

Can someone explain to me again why he was fired??
 
I completely agree with you - Rick seems to be in that elite class of NBA coach who always seems to get the most of his talent and overachieve by 5-10 games - I mean, did the 2005-2006 kings have any business going 44-38? Muss took the same team and did much, much worse.

Can someone explain to me again why he was fired??
unfortunately noone can answer that question.... not even the maloofs...
 
I would love nothing more than for Rick to prove me wrong, and go all Pat Reily 2006 on me.

But I doubt he will, because while the talent on his team is good, it is not nearly overwhelming enough, i.e. Pistons 2004...

He is a good regular season coach, but he just clams up in the playoffs.
 
I would love nothing more than for Rick to prove me wrong, and go all Pat Reily 2006 on me.

But I doubt he will, because while the talent on his team is good, it is not nearly overwhelming enough, i.e. Pistons 2004...

He is a good regular season coach, but he just clams up in the playoffs.

You could say that about a ton of coaches. The guy has gotten to two NBA finals and has advanced well into the playoffs several times. You really can't ask for much more. And its natural to rail on the coach and dissect his coaching to death when he fails. No coach that hasn't won it all is immune to this.

And our offseason isn't done yet. First and foremost, there's steve francis who will decide where he's going to by next week and we're obviously on that list. I think he really wants to win so he may not go with the Clips despite their having his BFF Mobley. It'll be us or the heat. Then we have to dump a few of our excess point guards and I'm sure there are teams out there that could use one or two.

If we get Stevie, then in one year we go from a defensive stalwart to an offensive juggernaut with pretty ridiculous depth at every position except PF (and hopefully we can trade some of those PGs for a serviceable veteran PF)

Our new GM has been a wizard so far, hopefully he can keep it up.
 
Well, I am not rating based on championships... otherwise Reily and Brown and Wilkins would be 'out of bounds' for my criticism. I judge based on performance based on the talent and opposition... and whether or not they are actually out-coached in a series.

IMHO, had Adleman won in 2002 or 2003, I still would view him as an inept playoff coach, unless he reinvented himself, i.e. Pat Reily in the 2006 playoffs, when he boldly called timeouts, and made some unique and creative strategies to advance to the Finals, and eventually win another championship.

Credit where credit is due: He might be better than Popavic on a bad series. Pop is weird: 1 minute he will look like any other choking coach, and the next he will pull a brilliant stunt out of his hat. Jurry is still out on him. Could be a product of having Timmay, or it could legitimately have something to do with him being a better version of Larry Brown. I still can't tell... but Rick did out-coach him 2 years ago... just didn't have enough talent, or basketball IQ on the roster.
 
You could say that about a ton of coaches. The guy has gotten to two NBA finals and has advanced well into the playoffs several times. You really can't ask for much more. And its natural to rail on the coach and dissect his coaching to death when he fails. No coach that hasn't won it all is immune to this.

And our offseason isn't done yet. First and foremost, there's steve francis who will decide where he's going to by next week and we're obviously on that list. I think he really wants to win so he may not go with the Clips despite their having his BFF Mobley. It'll be us or the heat. Then we have to dump a few of our excess point guards and I'm sure there are teams out there that could use one or two.

If we get Stevie, then in one year we go from a defensive stalwart to an offensive juggernaut with pretty ridiculous depth at every position except PF (and hopefully we can trade some of those PGs for a serviceable veteran PF)

Our new GM has been a wizard so far, hopefully he can keep it up.

I keep telling ya, if you do sign Stevie the final piece to a serious title run will be:

kenny_thomas.jpg


:D

Hmm...let's see:

Sac IN:
Bob Sura $3.84mil (ender)
Michael Doleac $3.12mil (ender)

Sac Out:
Kenny Thomas $7.33

Miami IN:
Rafer Alston $4.55mil

Miami OUT:
Michael Doleac $3.12mil (ender)

Hou IN:
Kenny Thomas $7.33mil

Hou OUT:
Rafer Alston $4.55mil
Bob Sura $3.84mil (ender)


ALMOST works (think Miami would have to toss in Simien to you guys, but that leaves them shy on the front line -- course can always fill that via a cheap FA). And what a blockbuster! :D
 
Last edited:
i always thought that if francis could be reunited with yao that he'd bounce back to form. and it's guaranteed if you can get mobley there with him!
 
i always thought that if francis could be reunited with yao that he'd bounce back to form. and it's guaranteed if you can get mobley there with him!


Of course given that "form" in that context is a selfish chucking non defending loser who can lead your team to 38 wins...great. ;) Still, as part of an accumulation of talent, with a coach who excels in getting guys to buy in (mostly) to such an accumualtion, yeah, might work. Get a dozen points out of Francis in the platoon, a dozen out of James, a dozen out of Bonzi, a dozen out of Battier, 20+ out of TMac and Yao, whatver Scola can give you, Borooks, Snyder, Head...and all of a sudden you're quite potent.
 
I am no lawyer, but I am pretty sure that NBA league rules prohibit the use of more than 1 basketball on the floor at any given time during regulation or overtime... in which case I don't see how that lineup could be even that productive...
 
I am no lawyer, but I am pretty sure that NBA league rules prohibit the use of more than 1 basketball on the floor at any given time during regulation or overtime... in which case I don't see how that lineup could be even that productive...


On the contrary, that lineup is considerably balanced with the roleplayers at SF and PF taking a backseat offensively to the stars and gunners at PG. There's also all kinds of inside/outisde scoring. Head and Snyder and Brooks most likely of course will be reduced to just being depth rather than guys routinely stealing shots. Think the question will/would be what type of player Scola is going to be in the NBA. Statistically overseas he looks like a bit of a scoring oriented weenie -- that's not going to work in that lineup obviously. Needs to be able to do the other things. The team should be up around that 100ppg barrier fairly easily, health permitting. And throw in KTs 15 and 15 off the bench and you have a dangerous group. ;)

P.S. The Kings had 7 double figure scorers at their peak in 01-02:
Webb (24.5) = Yao
Peja (21.2) = TMac
Bibby (13.7)= Francis (if he comes obviously)
Doug (12.0) = Battier
Vlade (11.1) = Scola
BJax (11.1) = James
Hedo (10.1) = Bonzi

Its doable, even before you get to the Brooks, Snyder, Head, KENNY THOMAS, Butler, Deke etc. depth.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top