Yep, and in usual George Maloof fashion, he thinks they can say anything and have the BoG believe it. The number of sponsors, season ticket holders, etc. who have come forth to show their support for the team and KJ and the new ownership group makes it clear to even the most myopic BoG member that the Maloofs have burned all their bridges in this regard. NOBODY wants them here. They know it but refuse to accept it. The BoG knows it and will act accordingly. The Kings will not belong to Maloof Sports and Entertainment after April. Bank on it.
Hansen agrees to price for Cook's piece of the Kings
- Thread starter nebs
- Start date
- Status
David Stern already said that once the Maloofs signed the deal to sell the team, they are no longer the decider of who gets the team in the end.
I remember around all star weekend, stern made it abundantly clear that once an owner signs off to sell their franchise, the decision is now in the hands of the BOG, not the former owners. The Magoofs have zero chance of keeping the kings. worse case would be the NBA takes over, like they did in new orleans. And we know how that ended up! New Orleans was sold to Tom Benson, because he was keeping them in New Orleans.
I remember around all star weekend, stern made it abundantly clear that once an owner signs off to sell their franchise, the decision is now in the hands of the BOG, not the former owners. The Magoofs have zero chance of keeping the kings. worse case would be the NBA takes over, like they did in new orleans. And we know how that ended up! New Orleans was sold to Tom Benson, because he was keeping them in New Orleans.
If this is coming from the Maloof side - and the spin has a fairly familiar ring of that. Then this is a very good sign that Hansen does not have the votes for ownership approval. You don't drop hints like this if you are in a secure position.
I guess we'll find out soon enough. It's in the best interest of the league to complete a sale. Just how much power they have to do that will be seen. I don't think at this point that the BOG will be influenced by any threat the Maloofs make.
I guess we'll find out soon enough. It's in the best interest of the league to complete a sale. Just how much power they have to do that will be seen. I don't think at this point that the BOG will be influenced by any threat the Maloofs make.
If anything, this could have the effect of convincing undecided board members that they do not want anything further to do with the Maloofs. And a little tiny voice continues to tell me we have a guardian angel in all this, someone who is subtly tweaking things so that it works out the way it should to keep the Kings in Sacramento with new owners and a new arena.
Even Grant Napier when asked last week if the Maloofs might not sell to a local group, said that would be rediculous. He pointed out that they would lose most of their sponsers and be faced with an empty arena almost every night. I think the Maloofs hope they can scare the BOG into approving the sale, but don't think it will work. The Maloofs are bluffing and everyone with a brain knows it. If they can barely afford to run the time now (which is debatable), they would have NO chance next season with the negative response the they would get from the Sacramento community.
The only reason the Maloofs could possibly be looked at with some semblance of humanity is if they were truly having to sell the team to Seattle because they couldn't get that money elsewhere. If there is another reason, like they spitefully want this city to lose its team, they are not only inhuman but going down that road probably wont get them too far, as evil doesn't make past karma too long
for now I'll take Scott Howard-Cooper's rumor and any future rumors with a boulder of salt until proven remotely accurate
this is of course assuming we sufficiently match the bid
for now I'll take Scott Howard-Cooper's rumor and any future rumors with a boulder of salt until proven remotely accurate
this is of course assuming we sufficiently match the bid
Last edited:
The Maloofs are acting with their usual bluster and bravado...and ignorance. David Stern made it crystal clear that they forfeited any say-so about the future of the Kings franchise when they accepted the offer from Seattle and submitted it to the NBA for approval. The Board of Governors is not going to let them continue to foul the waters. They (the Maloofs) have already done enough damage. I strongly suspect the actual vote is going to be a resounding indictment of their treatment of the city of Sacramento, the fans, their own employees, etc.
There are rumors floating around that timely paychecks are not always the rule of the day around STA recently. If MSE cannot even pay their employees on a timely basis, they certainly cannot hope to curry favor with the other NBA franchise owners.
There are rumors floating around that timely paychecks are not always the rule of the day around STA recently. If MSE cannot even pay their employees on a timely basis, they certainly cannot hope to curry favor with the other NBA franchise owners.
Not to mention it makes Sacramento look better when they say that crap because that just shows that the Maloofs never wanted to keep the team here. But pretty much anyone with a beating heart already knew they never had any intention of keeping the team here.
I was looking back at what I said about the Anaheim deal, and knew for a fact that they were wanting to move the team to LA to inflate the price and sell shortly after to the Ducks owner when the TV/sponsor deal was already in place. I think back to when I texted that to grant and he basically shot it down saying that I had no idea what I was thinking and that I needed to "get a brain you moron". Or something to that effect.
I was looking back at what I said about the Anaheim deal, and knew for a fact that they were wanting to move the team to LA to inflate the price and sell shortly after to the Ducks owner when the TV/sponsor deal was already in place. I think back to when I texted that to grant and he basically shot it down saying that I had no idea what I was thinking and that I needed to "get a brain you moron". Or something to that effect.
Is there a link to where Stern says that once the Maloofs signed a sales agreement with Hansen/Ballmer that they have lost all say in who owns the Kings? I just want to be sure that this isn't like the wisely circulated value of Mastrov at $350 mil. in that one web site posts it and it spreads around the internet as fact.
So, I was reading the Anaheim Royals threads..
Man... It was a WAY WORSE situation back then. Back then we were trying to find any source we could find in regards to getting an arena thing done. It wasn't until the Meetings where KJ dropped the Burkle bomb that we really got excited here...
But look back at the differences between then and now. NOW we have an arena deal, buyers for the team ect ect. Back then we were talking about renovating Arco as a possible ploy to keep the Kings here. Back then we all thought something was wrong in regards to why an arena deal couldn't get done here and some people were sympathetic to the Maloofs.
How times change. This time though we do look like we are in a better position to keep the Kings. I was reading the tweets as well from back then and they were all "done deal" ect ect. The OC Register reporter (Youngman) was even more optimistic than the Daniels guy from Seattle. Funny stuff. I suggest people go back and read the stuff to put perspective on this situation.
Man... It was a WAY WORSE situation back then. Back then we were trying to find any source we could find in regards to getting an arena thing done. It wasn't until the Meetings where KJ dropped the Burkle bomb that we really got excited here...
But look back at the differences between then and now. NOW we have an arena deal, buyers for the team ect ect. Back then we were talking about renovating Arco as a possible ploy to keep the Kings here. Back then we all thought something was wrong in regards to why an arena deal couldn't get done here and some people were sympathetic to the Maloofs.
How times change. This time though we do look like we are in a better position to keep the Kings. I was reading the tweets as well from back then and they were all "done deal" ect ect. The OC Register reporter (Youngman) was even more optimistic than the Daniels guy from Seattle. Funny stuff. I suggest people go back and read the stuff to put perspective on this situation.
You know what the saddest thing about this is? The Maloofs are getting their money either way. I'll repeat that, just in case it wasn't clear the first time: the Maloofs are getting their money either way. Yet they're still maloofing around trying to manipulate a BOG vote with the sole purpose of making sure that Sacramento loses its team.
Worst.
People.
In.
The.
World.
Worst.
People.
In.
The.
World.
This is as close as I could find. It essentially states that the BOG decides who gets the Kings but it implies that the BOG only gets to OK or nix an agreement. What I see in this is that if the Maloofs don't accept a bid from Sacto, there is nothing for the BOG to vote on. They can retain ownership which would be the stupidest ****ing thing they could do. In other words, they could do it just because it is the stupidest ****ing thing they could do.
The BOG vote on Hansen/Balmer would send a clear message to the Maloofs that any move to leave Sacramento would be nixed.
That's not the same as the BOG getting to choose a buyer that the Maloofs don't agree with.
http://www.sbnation.com/2013/3/9/4082402/david-stern-maloofs-sacramento-kings-sale-seattle
The BOG vote on Hansen/Balmer would send a clear message to the Maloofs that any move to leave Sacramento would be nixed.
That's not the same as the BOG getting to choose a buyer that the Maloofs don't agree with.
http://www.sbnation.com/2013/3/9/4082402/david-stern-maloofs-sacramento-kings-sale-seattle
There is another quote from Stern somewhere that indicates specifically that the Maloofs will not determine the future of the franchise. I know it's there somewhere and I'll keep hunting until I find it - or fall asleep at my keyboard. It might not have been the all-star presser. All this stuff is starting to mix together in my cold-addled Dayquil-intoxicated brain.
From SactownRoyalty
"Stern also noted that the Maloofs have made the process difficult for a Sacramento-based bid to be considered, but that the NBA BOG would take control of the process and, essentially, that the Maloofs would not be controlling the outcome."
That's still not the exact quote, but it's what I was thinking of. Stern said it in Oakland.
And a tweet from Aaron Bruski in the same article:
"That process will ultimately be determined by the board, not by the Maloofs on how to assess that."
"Stern also noted that the Maloofs have made the process difficult for a Sacramento-based bid to be considered, but that the NBA BOG would take control of the process and, essentially, that the Maloofs would not be controlling the outcome."
That's still not the exact quote, but it's what I was thinking of. Stern said it in Oakland.
And a tweet from Aaron Bruski in the same article:
"That process will ultimately be determined by the board, not by the Maloofs on how to assess that."
Yes, I saw that quote. I know I am being very, very picky but lawyers get very, very picky. If that quote had said that if the Maloofs chose to keep the team in Sacramento and the BOG could nix that idea, I'd be far more comfortable.
As it is, the Maloofs are backed into a corner and I realize this. It seems most likely the Hansen/Ballmer deal will be stopped with the 8 or more votes necessary to stop it. The message will be that the only deal that will be accepted is the one creating a tsunami with multiple whales beaching off the coast; the one with Burkle/Mastrov/Ranadive/Jacobs.
As a change of subject (a little) Stern has wanted Burkle, Ranadive and the Jacobs clan as owners in the NBA for quite awhile and now he has a 3 for 1 deal looking him straight in the face. The Jacobs are motivated because they were heart broken when the Clippers left their home town of San Diego and they don't want to see it happen to another city. It seems at least 3 of the whales are motivated beyond merely the desire for profit. We are fortunate.
As it is, the Maloofs are backed into a corner and I realize this. It seems most likely the Hansen/Ballmer deal will be stopped with the 8 or more votes necessary to stop it. The message will be that the only deal that will be accepted is the one creating a tsunami with multiple whales beaching off the coast; the one with Burkle/Mastrov/Ranadive/Jacobs.
As a change of subject (a little) Stern has wanted Burkle, Ranadive and the Jacobs clan as owners in the NBA for quite awhile and now he has a 3 for 1 deal looking him straight in the face. The Jacobs are motivated because they were heart broken when the Clippers left their home town of San Diego and they don't want to see it happen to another city. It seems at least 3 of the whales are motivated beyond merely the desire for profit. We are fortunate.
Last edited:
Isn't missing payroll one of the reported grounds for the league to take over? Untimely and missed payroll is awfully close. I left Sacramento nearly seventeen years ago, but what I recall is that the State of California doesn't take too kindly to late pay checks. One of our drivers took a detour with the paychecks and a state of panic ensued.
From what I've gathered, both from posts here at KF and from other sources, there are rumors running rampant about paychecks being delayed. No real details are forthcoming, however, most likely for one of two reasons: 1. The rumors are just that - rumors. or 2. The people involved need their paychecks - late or not - and making too much of this might cost them their jobs.
David Stern is a very smart man and a lawyer who chooses his words carefully. It's pretty clear what he meant when he made that comment. You can also take "where it's located" to mean with what ownership group, as in "ownership of the Kings will lie with the Sacramento investment group" or, alternatively, "ownership of the Kings will lie with the Seattle investment group." Bottom line is that the Maloofs will not be deciding the fate of the Kings. They already played that card. It's up to the BoG to do the rest.
IF the Maloofs refused to sell, the league could take over the franchise under the "best interests of the league" clause
IF the Maloofs refused to sell, the league could take over the franchise under the "best interests of the league" clause
They're petty, small and vindictive people. I used to think Gavin was different but since he was the one who reportedly gave the owner-seat tickets to the Laker fans, I have to assume he's as bad as the rest of them. There's no way he did that without knowing full well how it would be interpreted by Kings fans. He doesn't care. They don't care. I cannot wait until the day when they're known as the "former owners of the Sacramento Kings". It will go quite nicely with their other credits, like "former TV personality" and "former owner of the Palms Casino", etc.
Yep. One of the guys who was moved even said he got his tickets directly from Gavin. Thanks to Mike from CrownDowntown, the picture of the Lakers was tweeted to all his followers and retweeted to any number of other Kings fans. It was shortly thereafter, according to the CrownDowntown Facebook page, that the Lakers fans were moved to seats by the bench and the Kings fans were put into the Maloof seats.
- Status