fansinceday1
Starter
This simple post sums up the entire Kings franchise as it's currently put together. Bravo to you sir.can't build a skyscraper on a crapty foundation. just sayin
This simple post sums up the entire Kings franchise as it's currently put together. Bravo to you sir.can't build a skyscraper on a crapty foundation. just sayin
You, and others, are conflating two different issues. I never said anything about being able to win with an "unstable" centerpiece (although the '00s Blazers didn't really do that bad), what I said was that your centerpiece doesn't have to be the leader.No structure is architecturally sound with an unstable centerpiece.
IMO, the main ingredient is a FO that wants to build around cousins skill set. This FO wants to be the Warriors. Cousins cannot run with a warriors type team. HE CANT. It's that simple. He needs to go cause our FO has made their decision. They want to run. Cousins is not a running 3 pt shooting big.
Cousins was a non factor from the start of last nights game. It's why it's maddening to me that this loss is being blamed on him. His ejection didn't change any momentum. The Kings were already sinking with cousins and rondo in the lineup. They weren't gonna keep up with the Warriors with rondo and cousins in the lineup.
Maybe the rest of the roster isn't that good?George Karl continues to be THE problem. Except for Casspi and Rondo, the remainder of the roster is underperforming. That's a coach problem.
Maybe the rest of the roster isn't that good?
I'm curious what you think "taking a stand" means in this context. Cause I know what it would mean for me. Whether we win or lose, I've been equally upset with nearly every game this year because of how the team is playing. By my count there have been only a half dozen or so games this season where we looked like a team. That includes the first three games of the season -- nearly two months ago at this point. Almost everyone on the team has regressed in one way or another. There's the Indian Burial Ground theory. There's quantum decoherence (I did start watching this game in the third quarter right about the time everything went to poopoo...). Or we could employ Occam's Razor and ask if maybe the underperforming team with stagnant predictable offense, ineffective toothless defense, attitude problems aplenty, and a bad habit of blowing leads in the fourth quarter has the same problem that all teams exhibiting those tendencies have always had.
Cousins is often the scowling, flailing man-child at the center of our dysfunction but it would be a mistake, I think, to equate visibility with culpability. Cousins isn't setting the rotation, calling the plays, setting the defensive gameplan, or overseeing the development of McLemore, Moreland, Curry, and Cauley-Stein. Even at his very best there's only so much he can do individually as a player to help us win. Have we already forgotten that a year ago he was getting praised for his professionalism playing with Team USA? What could have happened in the last year which could cause a complete reversal in his individual maturity? (yes that was meant as a rhetorical question -- the answer should be obvious).
Look, I'm not happy with Cousins either. He has a measure of power in this organization by virtue of his talent that he could use to push for positive change. He could lead by example. He could hire his own private tutor to help develop his game. Or he could just drop the surly demeanor and act like playing basketball for a living isn't a chore. But let me ask this question to the board... If you didn't already know the name George Karl and have some idea of his prominent position on the All-Time wins list, would you look at the performances we've seen this season and say the coach is doing a solid job? If this is a first-time coach we're taking about on a minimum 1 year deal, would you have any qualms about kicking him to the curb? I respect his role in NBA history, but the brand of basketball he's got us playing looks eerily similar to another coach that DeMarcus Cousins had serious personality conflicts with. Even with Moses Malone and John Stockton taking the place of Cousins and Rondo we wouldn't be a. 500 team with this junkball system.
Isn't it funny how all of these guys had had some level of success, until they got here, and all of a sudden, maybe they just aren't any good?Maybe the rest of the roster isn't that good?
What? No we haven't. Unless, by "on a number of occasions," you mean the occasional 4-6 minute stretch.You make a good point but can't buy your last sentence. One possibility tha I haven't seen discussed is starting Koufos, giving him major minutes and bringing Cuz off the beach for a stretch, win or lose. We certainly have played well without Cuz, win or lose, on a number of ocassions.
What? No we haven't. Unless, by "on a number of occasions," you mean the occasional 4-6 minute stretch.
Which game was that?Yes, that is what I mean and those ocassions where it was considerably longer, even game length.
Unless?Start Koufos. Unless we can do better by starting Cuz?
Couldn't the same be said about the coach?Isn't it funny how all of these guys had had some level of success, until they got here, and all of a sudden, maybe they just aren't any good?
I don't know how? The coach is having a problem because he's trying to pound square pegs into round holes. It's not up to the players to turn themselves into round pegs, it's up to the coach to use a different peg board.Couldn't the same be said about the coach?
This season is like a jet that is quickly heading for the crater (should beat the ambulance there by 30 minutes). At this point everyone is on the trading block. Dont know who or how but some kind of change needs to occur. This team dont work, dont try, dont fit together, dont give effort, dont defend, dont value the ball, dont do nothing right....
Yes there is....meanwhile, Sac just gave up 20 3pointers.......20! Nice game planning going on there as most were open looks for a team that is built on taking those 3s.It is amazing the conclusions people reach after losing to a 29-1 team on the 29-1 team's home floor, in a game which we led at halftime.
I'm just saying if the argument is players played well before the got here, I think it could be said about the coach. I don't think the square peg analogy fits here because he has coached similar types of players in the past and was successful. Though not exact, I see similarities between gay and melo, dc and Lawson, rondo and Andre miller, kosta and...well kosta. Those are just a few off the top of my head. The only exception where I agree with you is dmc. I don't know if he's coached anyone with his skill set and making him a perimeter player is not working. But besides that, it's not like he forgot how to coach since getting here. I don't think all the blame should be on him. (Not saying you feel this way but others do) We are 5-5 in our last 10 games and just lost to the defending champs in a game probably 99.9% of us thought we would lose anyways. If you said we would have the lead coming into the 3rd quarter i would have thought you were crazy. All these trade cuz, fire karl posts by others are just too much. Now if we lose on weds then get back to me.I don't know how? The coach is having a problem because he's trying to pound square pegs into round holes. It's not up to the players to turn themselves into round pegs, it's up to the coach to use a different peg board.
It is amazing the conclusions people reach after losing to a 29-1 team on the 29-1 team's home floor, in a game which we led at halftime.
I don't consider there to be enough similarities between Anthony and Gay to be significant: Anthony is a player who can't be productive unless he's the focal point of your offense, whereas Gay is a player who can't be productive if he's the focal point of your offense. You can compare Collison to Lawson, I guess, but Karl wasn't bringing Lawson off the bench, and he wasn't playing him alongside another "pure" point guard. I kind of raise my eyebrows at the comparison of Rondo to Miller but, as has already been mentioned, Rondo is one of the two players who is not floundering. McLemore is playing worse, Belinelli is playing worse. Cousins and Gay are playing in a system that is not conducive to their strengths, and largely trying to get by on talent.I'm just saying if the argument is players played well before the got here, I think it could be said about the coach. I don't think the square peg analogy fits here because he has coached similar types of players in the past and was successful. Though not exact, I see similarities between gay and melo, dc and Lawson, rondo and Andre miller, kosta and...well kosta. Those are just a few off the top of my head. The only exception where I agree with you is dmc. I don't know if he's coached anyone with his skill set and making him a perimeter player is not working. But besides that, it's not like he forgot how to coach since getting here. I don't think all the blame should be on him. (Not saying you feel this way but others do) We are 5-5 in our last 10 games and just lost to the defending champs in a game probably 99.9% of us thought we would lose anyways. If you said we would have the lead coming into the 3rd quarter i would have thought you were crazy. All these trade cuz, fire karl posts by others are just too much. Now if we lose on weds then get back to me.
Here is an article on Vlade thinks DMC may get suspended.
http://nba.nbcsports.com/2015/12/29...xpects-suspension/?ocid=Yahoo&partner=ya5nbcs
I personally disagree with Vlade's comment. I didn't see any suspendable offense, he did not touch the official, only made a motion towards him.
I think what Vlade means when he says Cuz might get suspended is that the league, because of past suspensions, will suspend Cuz. I think reputation will play a huge part if he's suspended.Here is an article on Vlade thinks DMC may get suspended.
http://nba.nbcsports.com/2015/12/29...xpects-suspension/?ocid=Yahoo&partner=ya5nbcs
I personally disagree with Vlade's comment. I didn't see any suspendable offense, he did not touch the official, only made a motion towards him.
Isn't it funny how all of these guys had had some level of success, until they got here, and all of a sudden, maybe they just aren't any good?
It is amazing the conclusions people reach after losing to a 29-1 team on the 29-1 team's home floor, in a game which we led at halftime.
I don't see any reason either. Like you mentioned, no physical contact with official, and left in a timely matter. Why would he be suspended?Here is an article on Vlade thinks DMC may get suspended.
http://nba.nbcsports.com/2015/12/29...xpects-suspension/?ocid=Yahoo&partner=ya5nbcs
I personally disagree with Vlade's comment. I didn't see any suspendable offense, he did not touch the official, only made a motion towards him.
Of course I do. And you know this, man; you're not new here.I didn't say "any good" I said "that good" but you do love to pick the fight and not just with me.
You've got paperwork on that, right?which guys??? If Bellinelli was still good, he would still be a Spur
Well, it's a good thing that I didn't say anything like that, then... There was nobody on KF.com that was saying that Koufos was anything but an upgrade at the backup center position; and, on top of that, a whole bunch of people were on that, "Hey, he played for Karl before, this is going to work out great!"Koufus was a backup to Marc Gasol, that does NOT make him Marc Gasol lite or "kinda almost was Marc Gasol".
This question seems like a way to conveniently go back,and try to look prescient in hindsight. Except that I know you were online during last offseason, and you weren't saying anything about how these guys were washed up. You didn't really make many comments on the offseason moves: is that because you wanted to be able to go back, after the fact, and claim that you knew that these guys weren't any good, all along?Which guys were successful but then got here and lost it?
I think that George Karl is one of the most overrated coaches of my basketball "lifetime," and I've been very consistent about that, even before he became our head coach. He looks like an okay coach, when given a roster built to run his particular gimmick, and that's it.All that said, I'm arguing against both sides so it will be lonely. I don't think DMC should go but I don't think he is Hakeem. Im not crazy about Karl's defense but I don't think he is bad either...
If we were at or above .500 then I don't think people would be flipping out. For me it was the Portland game that pushed me over the edge. The Warriors game just solidified our atrocious defensive strategy, and the realization of our fears about Boogie regressing mentally.