[Grades] Grades v. Rockets 12/11/2014

Most disheartening loss of the season?

  • @OKC 11/9 -- blew the gimme against the crippled Thunder

    Votes: 1 1.6%
  • @DAL 11/11 - up 20+ in the first half, defense collapses after half

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • @MEM 11/13 -- up 20+ in first half, collapse and contested buzzer beating loss

    Votes: 33 54.1%
  • ORL 12/.6 -- Magic, at home, last game of their road trip...we lose

    Votes: 2 3.3%
  • @LAL 12/9 -- its the Lakers, we collapse and lose in the 4th

    Votes: 18 29.5%
  • HOU 12/11 -- back on national TV, collapse inthe 4th, Harden ties with a late 3, we're sub-.500

    Votes: 7 11.5%

  • Total voters
    61
  • Poll closed .

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
14jm54n.jpg



Hey, remember way back when two or three weeks ago this season was actually fun for the first time in eight years?

Boxscore

Stats: 40min 13pts (4-18, 1-4, 4-4) 8reb 8ast 3stl 0blk 4TO
Gay ( D ) -- okay, the Rudy Gay saga here ended up being much of the saga for the game, and Houston's strategy against him (the McHale can't coach chants seem markedly muted nowadays) largely responsible for not only his numbers, but Ben's and DC's as well. Basically McHale took a look at our roster , said "hey, will you look at that, they are trying to win with no shooters and only one guy who's ever averaged more than 15ppg in a season" andnthey came out and very obviously snd very distinctly set about taking away that one player and making just anybody else beat them on offense. What that looked like was Rudy being heavily trapped almsot every time he touched the ball and a possession by posession questin of whether he was going to respond to that by passing out of the doubles and getting assists to the relatively open Ben, or DC or JT or whoever, or whether he was going to instead force the issue right into the teeth of doubles, or settle for long threes that he at least knew weren't going to be heavily challenged becuase its precisely the shot McHale would love to see him take. And the thign was, on this night, he basically hit almost none fo the far too many attempts that he did force. Wasn't like that was sometimes working. It basically never did. When he finally got a clean little look on a broken open court play, he hit that. When he got a steal up top in the 3rd and went down the other way he finished with a dunk. But those lonely hits were smothered in bad forces, and a little scuffle with Patrick Beverly, whio might be the most unpopular player in the NBA methinks, but the sort of guy who makes you win. The reason this grade is no F is because there is more to a stat line than just FG%, and when Rudy did pass he racked up another remarkable statline as a point forward (he's now averaging 5.8ast per game since Cuz went down), and he used his length to be a factor on both the boards and defense, where he got his hands on a lot of balls. and down the stretch wasn't quite the unmitigated disaster the traditional narrative would say it was. It was a disaster, full of turnovers and forced shots, but there was a point there when it looked like Rudy might actually have made enough plays to win it. After a turnver trying to drive and dish to JT with us up 2, Rudy came down and hit a falling down pullup jumper to put up 2pts with 2:10 to go. He got beat the other way by Ariza for the tie, but then kicked a pass to DWill for a wide open three at the 1:40 mark, I think it was his 7th assist, that put us up 3 and seemed to have us in prime positon to win one again. Alas, if that storm Sacto was having could just have caved in the roof of the old barn this grade would have been at least a degree or two higher. Instead we got a bad bad, asinine really, not gonna pass it, settle for a long 3 at the 40 second mark, missed it, wasting our possesion and leaving it open for Harden to tie the game on a long three the other way with 20 seconds to go. Rudy still had a chance to be the hero onn the final play of regulation, when you know, I wasn't as upset with the shot we got as some. It was simple iso ball, but the shot Rudy got from it was one he can make, he got a little room, drove right, pulled up fairly open for an 18 footer...that's kind of one of his bread nad butters. And he's hit clutch shots before. But he was having a miserable nightk was out of rhythm, had just forced the terrible three, and now missed this one to leave us going to OT. So...not so amusing. In the Ot he did get one nice pass to JT for a bucket on a called play out of atimeout, but when left to his own he continued trying to win it with too much 1 on 1 stuff, and had one fo those epcially bad shooting nights he can have because he just won't stop shooting when its going bad. Not that we have many other options, but still.
--Brick

Stats: 35min13pts (2-4, 0-0, 9-11) 15reb 1ast 1stl 0blk 0TO
Thompson ( A ) -- JT played a great game. If this JT came out every game for the rest of the season then we’d be in very good shape. The Rockets were missing Howard and Terrance Jones and JT played fantastic post defense against Motiejunas and just feasted on the boards.He played mostly against Montiejunas and obliterated him on the boards 15-3. In addition to the recorded rebounds he continued to keep balls alive or kept possessions for the Kings and was just Big out there for the Kings. Not only was he big, he was clutch. In a remarkable turn of events he went to the free-throw line 11 times and made 9 of them. We haven’t seen that sort of FT shooting in quite a while, and no free-throws were bigger than the 2 he knocked down with just over a minute left in what should have been enough points to put the game away.Oh, did I forget to mention that he was the only starter not to have a turn-over?Yeah, only King with double digit rebounds and only starter with zero turn-overs…while going 9-11 from the FT line, killing his main opposition on the boards and playing stellar man defense…pretty much as good as you can hope for from JT.The only knock that you can even think about when looking at JT’s game was his rim defense against Harden…but you know what, Harden’s monster night does not come at JT’s expense. I’m sure JT could have been a bit better, but I think you’d be asking for a lot more than JT can give you if you had high expectations of JT stopping Harden.So yeah, we should have won this game, and JT should have been hailed as the only starter to not do something to cost us the win.--Uncia

Stats: 18min 5pts (2-2, 0-0, 1-6) 4reb 0ast 1stl 0blk 2TO
Evans ( C ) -- no sort of factor in the game's outcome and gets a no sort of factor grade. Aside from missed FTs, which of course he will do, but we could have used, there wasn't much to quibble about with Reggie. His lack of minutes in this one was really because he was a victim of our very success at getting the Rockets depleted frontline into major foul trouble, causing McHale to respond by going smallball, and Reggie to lose his minutes to DWill as Malone responded, There was some good rebounding work early, both in bards grabbed and in bodies banged so that other Kings could grab boards. But he never got into one of his dominant boarding rhythms against a Rockets frontline that features two poor man's versions of himself in Black and Dorsey, trying to do the same thing he is doing in filing in for a missing star center. In the early 3rd the Rockets were forcing us to use Reggie as a high poost decisionmaker, which other than one B.S. offensive foul clal on a dribbel handoff attempt wasn;t going as badly as you might think, but its obviously not his preferred role, and kept him away from the offensive glass. In any case, if he was a better FT shooter this would have been fine but unexceptional. The great center batle that TNT no doubt envisiioned when they scheduled this game, between Reggie Evans and tariq Blakc/Joey Dorsey ended up largely a draw. --Brick

Stats: 46min 21pts (9-16, 2-4, 1-3) 2reb 2ast 0stl 0blk 3TO
McLemore ( A ) -- Ben had a tough assignment tonight guarding Hardin, and he did a pretty darned good job. Yeah, I know, Hardin had 44 points, but he didn't get all of them against Ben, and Hardin shot 43% overall, and 33% from the three. Make no mistake, Hardin is a tough cover, and Ben made him work for every basket. On the other hand, Ben shot over 50% from the floor overall, and exactly 50% from the three. He played 46 minutes and scored 21 points. He might have scored more if his teammates would have fed him the ball more often. He started the game by missing an 18 footer, but Gay got the rebound, fed the ball right back to Ben who hit a three. After missing a three on a late pass with the clock running down, he came off an Evans screen and hit a 16 footer. He also showed good recognition by passing the ball to JT who had Hardin guarding him on a switch. Ben scored again hitting a 20 footer off the dribble., which he followed by hitting an 18 footer coming off a screen. Malone left him in to start the secoond quarter, but he hardly touched the ball, and got his first rest at 7:23 of the second quarter. He started the second half by getting the ball stolen, and followed that with a terrible pass that had no chance at all of getting to Gay for a turnover. He finally scored in the third quarter on a long pass from Gay on a breakaway. After playing great D on Hardin on the right baseline for a stop, he scored on a spectacular one handed alleyoop from Collison. The rest of the half was more of the same. Why the team decided from the about the 6 minute point of the fourth quarter, and the overtime, to go to Gay over and over again, and ally ignore Ben is beyond me. There are times when you just have to go with the hot hand, and Ben was consistent all night long. Another tough loss. We can't get Cuz back soon enough.--Baja

Stats: 42min 24pts (10-20, 2-4, 2-2) 3reb 7ast 3stl 0blk 6TO
Collison ( B+ ) -- I feel like I need to go and rewtach thsi one because I don't have nearly enough notes on a player as important in this one as Collison. He was the beneficiary of several advantages out there. From the beginning of the game the Rockets decided to take away Gay, which left DC relatively free against single coverage. then to make things a little easier still, when foul trouble to Houston's frontline caused McHale to insert Jason Terry and play smallball, Collison received fruther benefit (and lack of respect) when he started being guarded by Jason Terry, while Ben merited Patrick Beverly. The result fo all the lack fo respect wasn't a dominant game, and oddly he had turnover probelms for one of the few tiems this season. But he was able to consistetly get out on the break, and notched mutiple steals up tiop using his quickness. In the final seconds of the first quarter he raced out ont he break and dropped an assist to Reggie undr the hoop to put us up 10 and looking good. he added a few lighting darts blowing by everybody to the rim (which was fairly undefedned by size with the Rockets bigs all gone). In the 4th with Ben again gone silent, and Rudy forcign far too much, DC was our best player/hope of pulling this off. Had an alley oop to DWill who suddenly showed up again in regular smalball rotation minutes, Added a strong drive down the right side, snd then followed it with a little pullup into that dead space to get our lead back to 6 with 5min to go. But it wasn't enough to hold on. He would add a desperation three in a semi-intersting little run we made right at the end of OT, when Nik and DC hit back to back threes to suddenyl cut the lead to 2 in the final 10 seconds and raise an eyebrow , but that didn't work either. Despite the big numbers here, this felt like a support game to me. He picked his spots and took advantage of what Houston gave him, but the Rockets essential gamble that if they took away Rudy we wouldn't have that goto guy closer turned out to be right. --Brick
 
Last edited:
Bench

Stats: 18min 7pts (3-5, 0-0, 1-2) 1reb 0ast 0stl 2blk 2TO
Landry ( F ) -- As good as JT was in being a big, Landry was just as awful. On another night maybe Landry’s performance wouldn’t warrant such a bad grade, but the fact is, when you go from the stellar big man play of JT to the putrid big-man play of Landry, the contrast is just striking and the criticism comes rolling in. So I’m going to criticize and say how horrible a performance that was by Landry. He played 18 minutes and grabbed a single rebound…and that rebound he didn’t even get cleanly, but instead got a lucky bounce as he failed to control the initial defensive board and was just lucky not to lose the ball to Houston. Now you might look at the two blocked shots say ‘Hey! There are some big-man stats and JT didn’t get a single block! My response is simple: Landry’s two blocks were not impressive. One was a block on Motiejunas on a desperation baseline move and the second was one of those reach-in varieties in transition. Landry made three baskets, the first being a horrible ‘No, No, No, No! I can’t believe that went in’ turn-around jumper. He made one other mid-range shot and a lay-up courtesy of Nik, but he also blew a basket right at the rim. He also had two turn-overs at horrible times in the game. Yay… So he got crushed on the boards, didn’t play defense, took some really bad shots, and had two turn-overs. He had the worst plus-minus of anyone on the Kings in this one, and I think it really showed, especially if you saw the contrast between the Big Boy play that JT provided and the mini-man play that Landry gave us. Bleh. --Uncia

Stats: 34min 17pts (5-12, 2-4, 5-6) 5reb 1ast 0stl 0blk 1TO
Williams ( B+ ) -- I look at all these good grades being handed out and it just makles me shake my head, because its a sign that either we graders are getting overexcited, or that a real issue in all this mess is that we simply do not have enough talent, and that good/great games from 3-5 of our guys on any given night still may not be enough to win without Cousins because our guys' "A" games might only be "B-" games for the guys they are matched against,. Case in point: Derrick Williams. Dwill was essentially Reggie Evans' replacement on the evening, and if that makes no sense, consider it a smallball matchup substitution. When the Rockets went small and inserted little shooters instead oif big thugs, who ya gonna call? Er...Derrick Wiliams? Anyway, not infrequently found himself guading Harden (I think a coaching mistake by us, as the Rockets put on Beverly & Terry, and our reswponse was to move Ben off Harden onto one of the little guards, but Harden obviously is the key matchup and **** Jason Terry). Offensively as usual made his contributions in such big spalshy ways they were rather more memorable than a 5-12 night would indicate. Got a leak ou dunk on the break and added a three in the final minute of the half. Had another dunk to finish a break in the mid 4th to put us back up 3 and stepped up at a huge moment to hit the wide open three for us at the 1:30 mark to restore that 3pt lead. All bi moemnts and timelky moments, I don't think the good grade is undeserved. I just think that when you hand our 2 flat A's and 2 B+'s in a game and still lose it is a bit of an indictment on just how good a game it takes to get a top grade for those players. Sans Cuz we seemingly almost need evey single player to have at least an average/above average game by their standards to win. --Brick

Stats: 7min 2pts (1-2, 0-0, 0-0) 4reb 0ast 0stl 2blk 0TO
Hollins ( ) -- . --Brick

Stats: 11min 4pts (2-4, 0-0, 0-0) 2reb 1ast 0stl 0blk 0TO
Sessions ( C+ ) -- offensively at least this would have been an unexcetionable game for Ramon. In his first stint he missed his first jumper, but got a good drive stopping and letting the defense go by, and added a good pass ahead to DWill. During his later stint he responded wiht a little flip when our lead had been cut down to 1. But defenively I can't be so sure. The Rockets bombed a lot of threes while he was out there, and while its not clear that was Ramon's fault, somehow he ended up a -9 in only 11min of action. again I would like to rewatch to see if those truly were his respnsibilities or not. In any case, this was not a turnover prone bad forcing disaster.--Brick

Stats: 14min 3pts(1-2, 1-2, 0-0) 0reb 2ast 0stl 0blk 3TO
Stauskas ( F ) -- Frankly I'm a little tired of watch Nik pass up open shots. Granted, he only played 14 minutes, and he did go one for two over all for a spectacular 50% from the floor and from the three. But he passed up three open shots, one with no one within fifteen feet of him, and decided to pass the ball to Landry instead. He also managed to turn the ball over three times in that 14 minutes, twice by driving into the teeth of the defense and trying bounce passes that had no chance. The most irritating one came when he did a good job of driving the lane, and had a possible layup, but instead tried a shovel pass, and turned the ball over. He did have two assists, and one did come off a shovel pass in traffic. I'm a fan of Nik's, but he needs to take his shots when their there, and just be more aggressive overall. He also needs to stop playing so far off his man on defense. For the most part, he got away with it, but I don't call luck good defense--Baja

placeholder 1...
 
Last edited:
For the poll question for me it's still the Thunder game it was the only one we played with zero energy in and we lost to a team missing Durrant and WB, Dallas/Memphis are elite teams (at full strength) and the fact we could not hold leads against weaker opposition makes those losses sort of less bitter.
 
Poll question:
GREAT question, BTW - it's hard to compare such bullcrap performances, but for me it is easily the Lakers loss.
NO loss hurts a true Kings fan like a Lakers loss, and I truly believe that game showed us that Malone and Co just don't get it about Kings fans.

We will abide a LOT of things, but I predict that the Lakers loss is the beginning of the end for the honeymoon with this ownership and coaching and management.
The Lakers loss turned the entire season around - hit the brakes, smacked everyone in the face and made them face the reality of this team.
No more bright-eyed, dreamy dazes about how we did so well to start the season and really showed how we are playoff material and aren't we a good team now!

Malone and Co are playing with fire, losing to a Lakers team that pathetic.
There is NOTHING they could have done that pisses off the Kings fanbase more than losing to the G.D. Lakers.

I predict they are going to pay for not knowing this about the fanbase. Now they will have lost a lot of the goodwill their efforts up to now had engendered. There will be less looking the other way when abject mistakes are made by the management and coaching staff. There will be more open questioning of their decisions (I have no clue what reporter will ask them the actual questions, since everyone seems to be a complete sellout/sycophant incapable of doing their base jobs) but the fanbase will sure as hell be more receptive to criticism towards them now.

Yep - I predict the Lakers crapfest was a HUGELY disheartening loss.
 
This loss is squarely on the goat Rudy Gay and the pathetic game management (if you have the stomach to call it that) of Coach Malone, who has now leaped up in the standings of dumbcrap Kings coaches.

People have a lot of balls suggesting that Westphal and Smart were such horrendous coaches (when they both had pretty legendarily-bad rosters that were fairly-purposely set up to lose) yet they are still giving Malone a pass for making the same exact mistakes that Westphal and Smart both made repeatedly, and none of them ever learn from their mistakes!

The 1-4 flat is not a successful play in the NBA unless you have Lebron James or some superstar player that the defense simply CAN'T stop.
The 1-4 flat has failed the Kings SPECTACULARLY for six straight seasons, and has infuriated the fanbase by (now) THREE coach's addictions to inexplicably using it.

Yet here we are, in 2014/15 season where we desperately need wins to get over the hump of shame and step into the family room of NBA teams (instead of being relegated to the outside patio with the crap teams), and Coach Malone thought our best chance to win the game came in the form of Rudy Gay (shooting 2 for 14 at the time) and the good..... old..... 1-4 flat.

I literally can not think of anything Malone could realistically do out there that would be stupider and more deluded than that. If I didn't know better, I'd say he was clowning everyone as a test to see how far he can go before ANYone publicly questions his ****ed up decisions which have failed time and time and time again this season.
He keeps making the same decisions, that keep ending up failing.
I just can't think of what more he can do out there to make people call his coaching into question.
 
Malone has been setting Rudy up for failure quite honestly. It's not fair to Rudy

Yep. And you certainly don't ask Rudy to take the last shot with the way he was shooting it tonight. As I said in the game thread, they went out and signed a veteran PG for situations just like tonight. Put the damn ball in the hands of your best ball handler and decision maker then see what happens. If he can't create for someone else, he's got a much better chance at creating a shot for himself due to his quickness, speed and ability to hit mid-range shots.
 
I literally can not think of anything Malone could realistically do out there that would be stupider and more deluded than that. If I didn't know better, I'd say he was clowning everyone as a test to see how far he can go before ANYone publicly questions his ****ed up decisions which have failed time and time and time again this season.
He keeps making the same decisions, that keep ending up failing.
I just can't think of what more he can do out there to make people call his coaching into question.

He could increase Ramon's playing time :D
 
It really sucked to lose this. But I have to say it was a fun game to watch. We have some real players on this team! BMac was just awesome. Collison is such a journeyman pro. Dwill has become our 6th man (and that surprises me). Not to mention Stauskas will be a good player.

All I can say is, I hope we are learning from these tough losses. We should have a better record. We did play toe to toe with a top tier team. We really dominated the game. Except that last part that really counted the most.
 
This is a blessing in disguise because as much as it stings losing we all knew our roster was not ready for primetime, but we started 5-1 and everyone was in a wait and see approach. I thought that to be ridiculous because without Cousins our roster just has obvious and glaring holes that need to be fixed. I hope these losses open PDA's eyes because we really need a ton of work. I also hate to beat a dead horse here but as I stated numerous times Malone at some point has to take some heat for some of the things he does and plays that he runs. I hate the 1-4 flat. That's not even a play that's just called giving it to your best player and hoping he does something with it. Easiest play to guard. Stupid stupid stupid. Malone has just as much room to improve (if he can) as the team does, and that's a lot of room.
 
I guess the one man team stuff works for Kobe and Harden sometimes. The Kings need to play team ball, you know pass the ball and run actual plays. Last night towards the end of the 4th quarter I would have liked Collison for the mid range or the dish to McLemore.

Harden just when into the zone with that long three and taking over in overtime. You can't stop that.

Get well soon Cousins and Corbin.
 
Last edited:
This is a blessing in disguise because as much as it stings losing we all knew our roster was not ready for primetime, but we started 5-1 and everyone was in a wait and see approach. I thought that to be ridiculous because without Cousins our roster just has obvious and glaring holes that need to be fixed. I hope these losses open PDA's eyes because we really need a ton of work. I also hate to beat a dead horse here but as I stated numerous times Malone at some point has to take some heat for some of the things he does and plays that he runs. I hate the 1-4 flat. That's not even a play that's just called giving it to your best player and hoping he does something with it. Easiest play to guard. Stupid stupid stupid. Malone has just as much room to improve (if he can) as the team does, and that's a lot of room.

It's always a bad decision, when you lose. But let's be honest - in the last couple of games Rudy hit this contested pull-up midrange jumpshot plenty of time. It's an easy play to guard, but Rudy had a good look and missed it. And taking into account, that we had another 21 turnover performance i can't blame Malone, that he wanted to keep it as simple as possible. DC had 6 turnovers, we screwed up on simple handoffs - team is just not ready yet. Too many easy mistakes.
 
It's always a bad decision, when you lose. But let's be honest - in the last couple of games Rudy hit this contested pull-up midrange jumpshot plenty of time. It's an easy play to guard, but Rudy had a good look and missed it. And taking into account, that we had another 21 turnover performance i can't blame Malone, that he wanted to keep it as simple as possible. DC had 6 turnovers, we screwed up on simple handoffs - team is just not ready yet. Too many easy mistakes.
What do you mean? Rudy missed against the Pacers not even a week ago in OT and if Landry didn't luck out with being in the right place at the right time we lose that game too. Also Rudy had a terrible shooting night last night. Why not drive to the hoop and kick out to Ben for the shot? Rockets would have collapsed on him for sure if he drove. If I ran the play I would have Rudy drive to the hoop and the second he started driving I would have set a double pick up top for Ben to curl off of so by the time Rudy reached the paint he would have at least 2 defenders on him and Ben wide open for the shot. Can't blame Malone? I sure can. I would have rather lost the game trying to run a proper play than lose with the 1-4 flat. The other night he had Nik handling the ball for a potential game winning shot. The same rookie who hasn't done pretty much anything all season for us.
 
What do you mean? Rudy missed against the Pacers not even a week ago in OT and if Landry didn't luck out with being in the right place at the right time we lose that game too. Also Rudy had a terrible shooting night last night. Why not drive to the hoop and kick out to Ben for the shot? Rockets would have collapsed on him for sure if he drove. If I ran the play I would have Rudy drive to the hoop and the second he started driving I would have set a double pick up top for Ben to curl off of so by the time Rudy reached the paint he would have at least 2 defenders on him and Ben wide open for the shot. Can't blame Malone? I sure can. I would have rather lost the game trying to run a proper play than lose with the 1-4 flat. The other night he had Nik handling the ball for a potential game winning shot. The same rookie who hasn't done pretty much anything all season for us.

It all comes down to personal preference. But like I said, this team is often unable to run simple plays without committing a turnover. Rudy may have missed a gamewinner versus the Pacers, but when you take his overall performance into account, the midrange pullup is one of his bread and butter moves and due to his extension he can hit it even if he is guarded closely.
Rockets trapped Rudy all night long. If he tries to drive it to the hoop it may happen again. And his passing out of the double teams was bad.
In my opinion it wasn't a bad shot at all. He had a clear look to the basket and just missed it.
Of course Rudy had a bad game and it is a questionable decision to give him the ball. But Rudy is a pretty clutch player and hit gamewinners multiple times in Toronto and Memphis. He is the only experienced closer we got right now. Versus the Lakers Malone was criticized for giving the Ball to the Rookie. This time he gave it to the most experienced player. Still he takes the blame.
Right now it looks, that the training camp was all about defense for the Kings, just adding very few simple plays to get Cousins or Gay into position. Which is the correct approach if you are a bad defensive team and have two talented 1vs1 players. So without Cousins the team is learning on the fly, how to run plays for Ben or Stauskas. As a Coach i wouldn't call a play in a game winning situation, that i haven't trained over and over again.
 
OK this morning I am much less angry. After the game last night I wanted to punch a wall. The Rockets were in exactly the same position as the Kings. Missing their Allstar quality big man. Yet the Rockets stepped up and got the job done and the Kings curled into the fetal position in the 4th and rocked back and forth crying for their mommy.

The truth is the Kings are not a deep team. We have NOT arrived. We have many holes filled but many holes are still gaping and obvious.
 
Excuse me folks, but can someone please explain the difference between the usage of "versus" and "against". Everytime I write a post, i keep asking myself, which word I should use :confused:....Thanks
 
Excuse me folks, but can someone please explain the difference between the usage of "versus" and "against". Everytime I write a post, i keep asking myself, which word I should use :confused:....Thanks
For practical purposes in modern English there is no difference, and the word "against" is frequently used as a synonym for the word "versus" There is a nice long historical back story to the Medieval Latin origins of versus but in terms of use today they are pretty much interchangeable.
 
Excuse me folks, but can someone please explain the difference between the usage of "versus" and "against". Everytime I write a post, i keep asking myself, which word I should use :confused:....Thanks

They're pretty interchangeable. There are circumstances where "versus" doesn't work but "against" does (e.g. "He threw the book against the wall") but for most sports-related talk (e.g. "Rockets versus Kings", "Rockets against Kings", "The matchup versus Harden", "The matchup against Harden") both work pretty equally well.
 
For practical purposes in modern English there is no difference, and the word "against" is frequently used as a synonym for the word "versus" There is a nice long historical back story to the Medieval Latin origins of versus but in terms of use today they are pretty much interchangeable.

Pet peeve of mines is people using the word "verse" in place of "versus."
 
What these close games show us is that we don't yet have a closer. So when that's the case, you have to pass the ball and set screens to get as easy a shot as possible at the end of games.

Coaching staff is going to have to come to terms with this at some point. Run a play for the guy who has had the hottest hand and live with the results. You don't run a play for a guy who's been off all game or for the guy you just pulled off the bench.
 
Also, it's a bit of a style choice. "Versus" implies conflict where "against" is a little more neutral. It's never a bad idea to consult a dictionary with words you don't fully understand. You can see (here) that "versus" has a fairly limited usage -- while "against" has a wide range of uses (here) that depend on the context of the words around it.
 
It all comes down to personal preference. But like I said, this team is often unable to run simple plays without committing a turnover. Rudy may have missed a gamewinner versus the Pacers, but when you take his overall performance into account, the midrange pullup is one of his bread and butter moves and due to his extension he can hit it even if he is guarded closely.
Rockets trapped Rudy all night long. If he tries to drive it to the hoop it may happen again. And his passing out of the double teams was bad.
In my opinion it wasn't a bad shot at all. He had a clear look to the basket and just missed it.
Of course Rudy had a bad game and it is a questionable decision to give him the ball. But Rudy is a pretty clutch player and hit gamewinners multiple times in Toronto and Memphis. He is the only experienced closer we got right now. Versus the Lakers Malone was criticized for giving the Ball to the Rookie. This time he gave it to the most experienced player. Still he takes the blame.
Right now it looks, that the training camp was all about defense for the Kings, just adding very few simple plays to get Cousins or Gay into position. Which is the correct approach if you are a bad defensive team and have two talented 1vs1 players. So without Cousins the team is learning on the fly, how to run plays for Ben or Stauskas. As a Coach i wouldn't call a play in a game winning situation, that i haven't trained over and over again.
It's becoming apparent that running plays frequently isn't a trademark of Malones if we consistently turn it over. It's just like studying for a class. The more you study the better you are at it. The more times you run that play the better you become at it. It takes practice and that I blame on the coach 100%. It's not his first year coaching. It shouldn't be that hard to run a proper play at the end of a game. Those plays should be practiced consistently for games just like these. The 1-4 flat is an easy out. Malone didn't have a play for this situation sans cousins and basically left it up to Rudy.
 
Last edited:
What these close games show us is that we don't yet have a closer. So when that's the case, you have to pass the ball and set screens to get as easy a shot as possible at the end of games.

Coaching staff is going to have to come to terms with this at some point. Run a play for the guy who has had the hottest hand and live with the results. You don't run a play for a guy who's been off all game or for the guy you just pulled off the bench.

Yeah, this has been an issue for us for awhile and the problem may just be the expectation that you need to have a closer. If you think about teams that consistently convert down the stretch, it's usually about the execution of the play as a team not who ends up taking the actual shot.
 
Back
Top