Grades v. Lakers 01/04

Status
Not open for further replies.
Muss ( D+ ) --

Nice post on Muss ( and an even better post on the officials - but I digress).

On a bit of a side note, I was LOL in the final minute of the game when Muss was hopping around on the sidelines, literally in a defensive stance with his arms out as if he was actually in the game. Meanwhile, there was the Zen Master on the other side who rarely gets out of his seat, stays calm and most of all acts like he has been there before.

It was funny and embarrassing at the same time.
 
Nice post on Muss ( and an even better post on the officials - but I digress).

On a bit of a side note, I was LOL in the final minute of the game when Muss was hopping around on the sidelines, literally in a defensive stance with his arms out as if he was actually in the game. Meanwhile, there was the Zen Master on the other side who rarely gets out of his seat, stays calm and most of all acts like he has been there before.

It was funny and embarrassing at the same time.

I don't find Muss's antics at all funny nor embarrassing.

I find them refreshing and human.
 
Officials ( F ) -- good lord, this was ridiculous. Not that they favored either side in the first half -- indeed the two teams shot roughly equal amounts of FTs and had 19fls a piece. It was that they must have set some sort of NBA record by whistling up 57 first half Fts. 57. That's a game's worth. By half. Needless to say there was no rhythm to the game. How could there be? And then the second half...what a travesty. We shot 56 FTs in regulation tonight, and as I am not nearly the apologist that your average Lakers fan is, I cannot defend that, so I'm not going to try. At one point in the late 4th we'd shot 12 FTs, the Lakers zero. And then we get to OT and the B.S. reverses. The Lakers shoot 11, we get 2 and you can even throw in a critical uncalled travel on Kobe for good measure. The whole thing was immensely distracting. I felt icky down the stretch, like a Lakers fan with integrity would have in Game 6 years ago (I do not opine whether those exist). Not at all sure we were really earning the comeback or just being handed it. And then we get to OT, and it reverses, and it all just sucked and took away from an otherwise fun game. 102 FTs were shot in this game. 102. Just...ick. Let them decide it on the floor please. And Bavetta -- retire already. Okay, enough rant. Onto the game:

I respect you for calling the game objectively.

OT - Kobe shot 6 FT on a fouling end game situation for the kings, I think two more FTs were by Smush on a hard foul disrupting a layup, two more by Cook on a hard foul by Garcia on a dunk attempt. i am not sure about the rest, but its tough for the refs to not call those fouls.
 
Last edited:
i hope you expect a lot to change in 10 games, otherwise you're lookin' at a similar assessment then as you might give now.

Well, a few games ago Bibby couldn't hit the broad side of a barn. A few games can make a difference sometimes....
 
I know how many of you feel because for 30 minutes I thought La had lost,I took my girlfriend home in the rain all sad and depressed trying to make it better listening to the beatles.

Heh. Exhibiting your good taste twice. I'm a fan of both myself.

I got you beat tho. I thought they were gonna lose a day before the game. I haven't watched it all yet, just saw the OT. Gonna peep it tonight to see how rotten the zebras were. I'm glad that Kobe spotted Smush, but I shudder at him passing it to him for the game. One thing I'll say for Smush is that he can convert layups unlike Fisher. Damn near everything else he sucks at.
 
Last edited:
People are being way, way, way too hard on Musselman. I know he's made so many early miscues that it's become almost habit to blame him for everything, but I thought this was, by far, his best coached game.

With the way the team came out so sluggish and dazed, this could easily have been a 30 point blowout. Musselman calls two timeouts, gets things focused. Cook is killing KT, Muss makes the counterintuitive move of bringing in Salmons, which works. When the Lakers were having their way inside he switches to a zone. In the third quarter, he went with that big lineup, which got the team within scratching distance, but he didn't mindlessly ride that lineup all the way, instead he made another smart move in going small and putting Corliss on Bynum, which worked.

As far as the two late game calls, the Douby three may have been a stretch, but come on -- a wide open three when the Kings needed a three, and Douby is a shooter. If he made it (like, say, Radmanovic made his in the exact same scenario), Muss looks smart. I don't think Corliss was the first option on that out of bounds play, but the Lakers overplayed Bibby and Martin. So hey, Corliss got a wide open layup to tie. If he made it, Muss looks smart. Those were two good looks.

I'm still not happy that Kevin Martin still seems to be an afterthought, and there are times when Musselman definitely outthinks himself. But come on. This team was two missed free throws away from an improbable victory. Muss didn't shoot the free throws. Stop blaming him.

Here here-

Cut the man some slack...we came back 21 points against a decent/good laker team, this wasn't the hawks or the knicks. He made some good substition patterns, and how is he to blame for our top 2 FT shooters missing the ones that would ice the game. The kobes were overplaying bibby and martin and corliss had a look....might i add AN EXCELLANT POINT BLANK look, that after looking at replay goes in 95% of the time.

Cut him some slack.
 
Muss ( D+ ) -- and so the adventure continues. So hard to grade Muss anymore, becuase its always just shades of unhappiness. And tonight, did not think he was awful all the way through. But it was punctuated by total..mistakes. Just duhs that drag the whole thing down again. Anyway, let's just hop right in. We did not seem ready to go in this one, as the Lakers came right out and popped us in the nose and we did nothing. But Muss was smarter this time and called several early timeouts trying to wake us up as we fell behind 19-6. A huge part of the problem stemmed from this simple observation: Lakers big, Kings small (and even smaller after Muss's first substitution was to put in Salmons for KT). And they pummeled us relentlessly on the glass because of it. We were still managing to hang around as we are always pretty tough in a FT shooting contest, but critical breakdowns in the dying seconds of the half let the Lakers can two three pointers to pull out to a game high 16pt lead. And in the third things started to turn from bad to worse as at one point we were down by 20 and Charles and Marv were blathering on inanely about Charles's ability to beat 67 yr old Dick Bavetta in a foot race rather than announce what was clearly going to be a blowout. But a funny thing happened. Muss started messing around with lineups, at one point going with a big lineup with Ron at OG and Corliss in the game at SF in place of Kevin. Might have helped. Then Reef, who was otherwise ineffective, hit a string of jumpers form the top of the key as we began to find ways to take advantage of Bynum rather than the other way around. And before you know it we were creeping back into it. In late regulation, Muss was making moves that were helping -- late traps and doubles on Kobe were effective, and Mike and Corliss were running a pick and roll the Lakers never did solve (using Corliss as a mini-center to bother the inexpereicend Bynum really worked as well). But things went awry after blown FTs and a missed defensive coverage let the Lakers tie it back up and send it to OT. All of a sudden the inexperienced kiddie coach being too clever for his own good rememerged, and you could almost here the squeals coming out of our timeout huddles of "that would be soooo kewl!!!". So with a minute left and down by 5 we come out of the timeout and, get this, our play is to reinsert Quincy Douby stone cold for the first time since the first half of the game, and ask him to drain a three? That was the best we could come up with? I suppose I'll mention it did not work. And so we miss, and go onto the next screwup as down by 3 with 25 seconds to go, Lakers ball with a 24 second shot clock, we don't automatically foul until 12 seconds had run off the clock? And then in spite of that, Mike comes back and hits another enormous three, so we still have a last gasp. And on our final play to tie or win we... come out of the timeout with a surprise call to Corliss on the drive inside, which he missed despite a great look. Good look, but damnit that's classic Muss again -- the smart kid playing an NBA game like its NBA Live and thinking wouldn't that be cute? Just give the damn ball to your best player on the night and see what happens Muss. He's been there before. Win or lose with him, and save yourself a grade. ;)


I don't want to come off to be a huge Muss fan. But if 2 90% FT shooters could have hit clutch FT's to seal the game, Muss's grade would have been an A. As his downfall came in OT. As far as him playing small in the 1st he didn't have much of a choice. I mean we would have all laid a gold brick had Bibby, Martin, or Artest not started. So i blame that on GP. The calls in OT were aweful i agree.
 
Last edited:
i hope you expect a lot to change in 10 games, otherwise you're lookin' at a similar assessment then as you might give now.

Muss said in an interview that you don't even know what your team can do until you've played 40 games. Seems reasonable given the newness of the team.

I like that Muss is exploring the options right now, not always making the safest bets. He hasn't got a great hand to play in the team with a critical deficiency in the front court, but i can't blame him for that. You can't blame him for losing Bonzi either - no one would dare call the Kings soft with Bonzi and Artest on the floor.

The thing I like about what Muss is doing is looking for an effective way to use more of his players. That's essential for contending.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top