Landry is a glaring weak link defensively, and very selfish on offense. I remain disgusted.
I actually do think he should start though. As terrible as he is at everything else, we need his offense in the starting lineup. I do however think he should be limited to bench minutes, something between 24-26mpg, with the rest of his minutes given to JT. Despite the team's newfound D, opponents have still gone on runs against us, and its usually by exploiting the matchup at PF (Humphries when we played the Nets, West killing it in the 4th tonight). If he gave half the effort on defensive rebounding that he gives on offensive rebounding then he'd be a lot better in my eyes. Dude averages 2.7 defensive rebounds a game in 30 minutes. JT averages 2.8 in 14 minutes. Teams get a lot of second chances when Landry is on the floor (see: Nets game 3rd quarter), assuming they dont just outright steamroll him with their PF.
Also, a pattern I have noticed with Landry is that he has really great 1st quarters, and then falls off. Which causes Westphal to ride him even when he's jacking up ill advised 3 pointers, getting blocked inside, getting destroyed by scrubs, allowing guards to snatch rebounds from him, et cetra. I'd actually like him if he played a more limited role for us off the bench. But then JT would start next to Dally, and a JT/Dally frontline is just as bad on offense as the Landry/Cousins lineup is on D.
Landry/Dally starting and JT/Cousins off the bench seems like it could work out quite well for us, maybe Westphal will try it eventually.