Nobody has made this thread yet, probably because nobody really wants to re-live this one. But now here it is. I don't expect too many vowels in the grades tonight, but call 'em as you see 'em!
Huh everybody is down on Kosta? Dude had 6 offensive boards in 22 minutes. I agree, that he isn't much of a finesse guy, but he is the ultimate workhorse of NBA basketball. With this in mind I would give him a C, because he missed a couple of easy shots and had trouble on the line. Until Willie finally proves he can be consistent KK is still valuable.
Huh everybody is down on Kosta? Dude had 6 offensive boards in 22 minutes. I agree, that he isn't much of a finesse guy, but he is the ultimate workhorse of NBA basketball. With this in mind I would give him a C, because he missed a couple of easy shots and had trouble on the line. Until Willie finally proves he can be consistent KK is still valuable.
It's an ongoing trend these days. WCS played like an absolute wuss out there. Getting absolutely murked by Tyson Chandler and having a big hand in the team going down by 22 points to the worst team in the league. Then Kosta comes in with just his regular natural toughness and all the sudden Chandler becomes an after thought for the rest of the game. Almost completely irrelevant after dominating WCS for a quarter. WCS made him look like prime Chandler. Kosta reminded him that he's old.
Yeah the guy doesn't deserve an A because he bricked his free throws and continued his unKosta like inefficient offense but give the guy some credit because he's every bit the defender Temple is, if not better.
The problem with WCS like others have said, is consistency. He can play good defense but he doesn't do it all the time. Imo his perimeter defense on switches especially can be elite however his interior defense too often is bad. I hesitate to say he's lazy it just seems like his mindset is to be a small forward instead of a center.Willie was in at the end and was part of the crew that made the game close. His defense is very under rated IMO.