We can be like the Dollar Store brand Atlanta Hawks: other teams will never be able to figure who's going to score.**** it. Build around Omri.
????The Kings are looking really well right now against the Jazz, I personally think Rudy Gobert is pretty much overrated, the hype around him is too much, too exaggerated the way I see it, although he is a pretty decent defender.
I personally think Rudy Gobert is pretty much overrated, the hype around him is too much, too exaggerated the way I see it,
too exaggerated the way I see it, although he is a pretty decent defender.
He was made by the media to one of the best defenders in the league, media talks about him like if he is a NBA star in his prime, which he is clearly not.????
What, exactly, do you think that the "hype" is based on? What is it that you think he's hyped as?
He was made by the media to one of the best defenders in the league, media talks about him like if he is a NBA star in his prime, which he is clearly not.
He is a good defender, but not at the level that the media purports to show us, he is a decent shot blocker thanks to his unbelievable length, but there is nothing more than that, he is very limited on offense to my likely.
He was made by the media to one of the best defenders in the league, media talks about him like if he is a NBA star in his prime, which he is clearly not.
He is a good defender, but not at the level that the media purports to show us, he is a decent shot blocker thanks to his unbelievable length, but there is nothing more than that, he is very limited on offense to my likely.
First of All™, nobody but nobody has said that Gobert was any good on offense, not even the Utah commentators. Second of all, exactly how good do you think the average defender is in the NBA? Who are all these super-elite defenders that you're looking at, that you look at Gobert and say, "Eh, he's aiight"?He was made by the media to one of the best defenders in the league, media talks about him like if he is a NBA star in his prime, which he is clearly not.
He is a good defender, but not at the level that the media purports to show us, he is a decent shot blocker thanks to his unbelievable length, but there is nothing more than that, he is very limited on offense to my likely.
And which team is doing the tanking? Utah has no incentive to lose: they can't improve their lottery position, anyway.This game is tanktastic
And which team is doing the tanking? Utah has no incentive to lose: they can't improve their lottery position, anyway.
They're not tied in the loss column. And, doing some schedule forecasting, I'm going to say it again: they have neither any incentive nor need to tank.The Jazz have 35 wins, tied for 10/11/12 in the lottery with Indiana and Miami and only 2 games ahead of #9 Charlotte. The swing between 9 and 12 is not insignificant. I'm not saying they're tanking, I'm just saying the Jazz certainly could have incentive to lose if their FO were inclined that way.
You know what's nice? BK, we wouldn't have stood a chance in this game. The Kings would have been DOA and would have spent most of their time running around like chickens without heads.
What I'm seeing - for the most part - if effort. Yeah, there are still some bonehead plays but there's also accountability. As I'm writing this, George Karl is apoplectic on the sidelines over a lack of defensive effort. And, unlike his predecessor, Karl will make sure the team knows exactly what they did wrong.
You know what's nice? BK, we wouldn't have stood a chance in this game. The Kings would have been DOA and would have spent most of their time running around like chickens without heads.
What I'm seeing - for the most part - if effort. Yeah, there are still some bonehead plays but there's also accountability. As I'm writing this, George Karl is apoplectic on the sidelines over a lack of defensive effort. And, unlike his predecessor, Karl will make sure the team knows exactly what they did wrong.
As soon as you wrote this, Landry decided it was time to step up and lead the tank. Well done, Landry.
You're right, they're not. They're actually "behind" in the loss column, which, if they were tanking, would give them incentive to lose.They're not tied in the loss column.
And, doing some schedule forecasting, I'm going to say it again: they have neither any incentive nor need to tank.