Fire Petrie says Bee's Voisin in Kings troubles rant

The problem I have with firing GP is we don't know how much the Maloofs are handicapping him. Was he forced into a Jimmer trade by the Maloofs? Has he even been able to talk to $8-12 million FA's? What kind of budget has he been given to go find a coach? Perhaps the Maloofs gave him a budget for a coach that would only be enough to hire the cheapest coaches in the league.

While Petrie certainly gets some of the blame, I just don't see how he could be so blind at putting a team together without some sort of restraint when he's been an incredible judge of talent for a long time. You don't have his draft record if you can't identify proper talent. To me, the real crux of the problem will always rest with our owners. If they aren't willing to spend money on a coach, or go commit to big a FA long-term (10mil+), then Petrie is playing against a stacked deck as far as putting a team together. When Chuck Hayes has been the largest FA acquisition $ wise who wasn't previously on the team, you know you're limited in your opportunity to compete in FA
 
meh.
With broken owners and Smart (and predecessors) to welcome and develop talents GM does not matter.

Rich Maloofs + Adelman = GP genious
Poor Maloofs + PPT experts = GP sucks
 
The problem I have with firing GP is we don't know how much the Maloofs are handicapping him. Was he forced into a Jimmer trade by the Maloofs? Has he even been able to talk to $8-12 million FA's? What kind of budget has he been given to go find a coach? Perhaps the Maloofs gave him a budget for a coach that would only be enough to hire the cheapest coaches in the league.

While Petrie certainly gets some of the blame, I just don't see how he could be so blind at putting a team together without some sort of restraint when he's been an incredible judge of talent for a long time. You don't have his draft record if you can't identify proper talent. To me, the real crux of the problem will always rest with our owners. If they aren't willing to spend money on a coach, or go commit to big a FA long-term (10mil+), then Petrie is playing against a stacked deck as far as putting a team together. When Chuck Hayes has been the largest FA acquisition $ wise who wasn't previously on the team, you know you're limited in your opportunity to compete in FA

Always possible but it still doesn't explain the pursuing of mismatched parts and lack of complimentary pieces. No reason to spend on outlaw, salmons, brooks, Garcia or to not address pieces that would have fit better but not necessarily cost more.
 
So blame the gm, who has compiled the necessary talent, but dont blame coach smart or the broke owners that have tried to sabotage the city? Where is the logic? The owners are too broke to go over the cap and the headcoach is incapable of being a headcoach. The source of the problem is the owners.


The necessary talent to be in last place once again. Reke and Cousins play to their potential every several games and are not cornerstones at this stage of their careers. Role players (Salmons, Outlaw, Johnson, Brooks etc.) just come here to retire and not play to the abilities they had previously shown. The Maloofs obviously deserve much culpability, but the environment has become toxic and Petrie and his inabilities have helped foster it. Any franchise that has sucked this long, and show no signs of improvement and the GM would certainly not survive.
 
Well she is not wrong. Petrie has failed to rebuild properly, The team as is-- is not working. Now this may be because he has lost it, or quit trying. Other theirs say he has his hands tied by Maloofs who can't spend the money to properly rebuild or the even deeper conspiracy theory states the Maloofs WANT to loose so they can move the team (Insert Major League joke here) What all these theories do beg is the question will firing Petrie actually change anything? and only the Maloofs know the answer to that. I will say this, over all the past several years Petrie has show he can still get talent out of the draft, but can he put together a team that way? Can he pick out good coaches? Probably not. I see no reason to keep Petrie, but I don't have much faith that the Maloofs can/will get anyone better. If there is a hope it is that they can find some young brain trust that can bring the "money ball" concept to the NBA.
 
I am totally split on Petrie. I don't really want him back, but I don't really need him to be replaced, either.

I guess on my totem pole of things that need to be fixed, Petrie comes after 'coach' and 'roster' .. which is strange because those things will be up to Petrie (or will it? do the Maloofs have the money to hire a coach or fix the roster?). We're kind of stuck here.



I have supported Petrie all along. IMHO The best move would be a coach with input in the player decisions with a proven track record. I'm talking Phil Jackson, Jerry Sloan or maybe Jeff Van Gundy. This would require the Maloofs to spend some serious $$$ on this coach AND aquiring proven Veteran talent. The Kings are loaded with young players with potential other teams would want. Give Petrie an blank check and lets see what he can do. I am still of the opinion that Petrie can get the job done if he has the $$$ to spend and there is a proven Coach in place.

If the Maloofs are not going to Support Petrie with some serious $$$ then I agree he should be allowed a graceful exit. Then they can fire Smart and turn the whole thing over to somebody who will continue to work cheap like Whisenhut.

KB
 
The problem with blaming the Maloofs only is that Petrie got the green light this year and spent up to the cap. Team is still a mess. The Salmons/Beno trade and signing Hayes instead of Dalembert is still fully on him. There was not a good reason for either of those decisions and they were widely criticized here and in the media at the time. We'd be a much better team if he hadn't made those moves. After years of supporting his tenure I think it's time he goes.
 
Who would want to work for the Maloofs? Throwing around names like Pritchard, Bird, Nelson, etc are only going to lead to disappointment in the end. Anyone intelligent enough to do a good job is intelligent enough to know the job can't be done working for these guys.

This may be way out in left field, but why not Webber? At one point he was said to have had his sights set on the GM job, and with the way he stepped up during the arena negotiations, and from his playing days, he is loved in the area and would create a huge buzz and interest from the city back into this team. The Maloofs might have some resentment leftover from the arena stuff, but it go a long way PR wise in making them looking committed to the city with this move.

As far as his qualifications as a GM, who cares. He's probably got as much chance of being successful as anyone else the Maloofs could get. Its not like we can get much worse, so it would be fun to see it play out.
 
The idea that the Maloofs haven't allowed Petrie to spend and therefor he shouldn't receive a great deal of blame is a fallacy.

Our team salary this year is 58.136M. We're spending over 58M on salary this year and some are still saying Petries hands are tied?

Trading Beno for Salmons and drafting Jimmer was terrible.

Signing Outlaw was a complete waste of money.

Offering Chuck a 5M per contract was too much, and didn't make much sense after letting Daly go and having a 6'6" guy be his replacement, or if he's not Daly's replacement, still not bringing in a replacement.

Trading Kevin for Landry, then Landry for MT didn't make us better. Bringing in a bunch of guards to impede what MT can do is worse.

Going hard after Jamal Crawford last year and then Brooks this year, when another stubby chucker is the last thing we need is asinine.

Drafting TRob, while I do think he has potential to be a solid NBA player, is looking worse, and not working him out before picking him raises red flags.

Letting Hassan go, and still not getting any kind of a backup center since Daly left is a huge error on Petrie's part.

Trading away a 1st round pick to get Hickson, who was then cut as he sucked for us, was wasteful.

Putting a priority on undersized chuckers instead of not fixing out SF problem and/or getting a backup center/rim protection has gone on for years.


Sure you can say Maloofs might have prevented Petrie from splashing down enough to get a big name player, but the idea Petrie in general hasn't been allowed to spend just isn't correct. He has spent, he has drafted, he has made trades, and for the most part in the last 2-3 years they've all been the wrong decisions. If a friend had 100K to spend on a car and me 20K, of course he's going to get a much nicer car, but that's not an excuse for me to blow my 20K on some beat up piece of crap which can barely make it around the block. I can't use the excuse that since I didn't have 100K, my hand was forced and I simply didn't have better options. No, the 20K I spent on a piece of crap car was allocated incorrectly. I spent it poorly. Other teams with 58M overall salaries have teams which fit together much better.

Then we get into coaching. If money is so hard to come by and Petrie has such tight restraints, then why extend Smart for two years, especially after the previous 6 years where more than once we've extended a coach, ended up eating his contract and paying two coaches at once, which we'll do again. So money is this huge issue, yet we we're spending 58M on our roster and once again will pay two coaches at once? No, we're just throwing away money irresponsibly. Just because you're on a budget doesn't mean you get to spend irresponsibly.

All that being said, if Petrie had the cojones to get through to Smart and correct some of this crap I might keep him around. But given how scared Petrie is to even make a statement in the media, let alone do an interview, I have zero confidence he'll get through to Smart.
 
Last edited:
I have been a long time supporter of Petrie. However, he is the GM and President of Operations and is responsible for everything. If the Maloofs are, in fact, calling most of the shots then Petrie needs to salvage his self esteem and reputation by resigning. If he is truly making all of the decisions (as he should be) he needs to be let go.
 
One key point not brought up in Voisin's article is this: Is Petrie capable of cleaning up his own mess? Somebody has to be the janitor here, if GP is not up to the job then someone else should take over.

Unfortunately, it looks to me that GP, either blinded by his bias or frozen by the monumental task, is simply standing idling by while the ship is sinking. There is no excuse for why Outlaw is still on the team, no excuse for not getting pieces that fit, no excuse for the bad draft picks. You can blame the Maloofs but I have a hard time picturing the Maloofs demanding that we trade for John Salmons or signing Aaron Brooks. The Maloofs like to sit back and enjoy the show, yes; but they simply do not struck me as that detail oriented.

This mess is on Petrie. I'll give him until the trade deadline and see what he does before calling for his head. I expect to see some serious house cleaning follow by more moves in the summer - moves that make sense. Not another Hickson/Salmons debacle.
 
Last edited:
I would be shocked if he actually did. That has always seemed like a bogus title for a guy who's been around the team for half his life.

On two different occasions, I was able to sit down with Reynolds and just shoot the bull for an extended period of time. It was a long time ago, and then, if you kept buying the beer, he kept sitting there and relating stories.(he no longer drinks by the way) Once was at the Fair Oaks sports bar and grill. Don't be fooled by the image he projects on TV. Off camera he's an entirely different person. Knowledgable, and tough minded. Having said that, I wouldn't recommend him for the GM job because I think they need some outside blood to come in and shake things up. I like stability as much as the next person, but right now, management has become so stable, it appears nonexistent at times.

I realize that many have reservations about firing Petrie because of who might replace him. I understand that, but its apples and oranges. If you truely believe someone isn't doing a good job, you fire them, and deal with the other issues that result from that firing later. Otherwise you have paralysis by analysis. I know its easy to blame the Maloofs. I have no doubt they've meddled. But I just don't think you can blame them for every decision that was made. I doubt they decided to pick up Outlaw. Yes, he's relatively cheap, but there are other players that were just as cheap, or slightly more expensive that would have been better fits, and who were more proven.

The trend that Petrie has been in, is to pick up players that border on being good players potential wise, with the hope they blossom with us. Outlaw, James Johnson, JJ Hickson, Sheldon Williams, Rashon McCants, and yes, I'll throw Thornton into that group. Hey, hitting on one out of maybe 10 ain't bad is it? Instead of going after more veteran players with proven records like Kyle Korver, Lou Williams, etc. If its all about money, then instead of outfitting the team with 4 or 5 cheap average to below average players, combine that money and get one good player. Just look at the results of what the combined salaries of Salmons, Cisco, Brooks, James Johnson and Outlaw has gotten us.

Those salaries add up to $23,245,006.00. Thats a lot of money folks, and with that amount of money, spent more wisely, we could have had at least two very good basketball players, maybe three. You tell me, are we getting our moneys worth? I think not! Does any thought go into these player decisions? Are they just knee jerk reactions of the moment.

Who would you rather have on the team right now. Garcia, or Korver? I think most would say Korver. Guess what, Garcia makes more money than Korver. Yeah, I know we drafted Cisco, but I'm trying to make a point. In the previous draft to the recent one, when it was our turn to pick in the second round there were two players sitting there that I had on my list. Tyler Honeycutt and Chandler Parsons. I had Parsons rated ahead of Honeycutt. I just thought he was bigger, and overall more skilled than Honeycutt. So we took Honeycutt, who is now playing in the D-League, probably waiting for his next injury, while Parsons is the starting SF for Houston. And in my opinion, he's a better SF than anyone desguised as one on our team. Did the Maloofs make that choice? I doubt it.

Now thats a small mistake, but with big consequences. And there have been a lot of them of late. No bold moves, just conservative safe moves which have netted zero improvement. Was T. Robb a bad choice? No, I don't think so, but the real question should be, was he the right choice? In reality, he was, once again, the safe choice. Great reputation! Hard worker! And, we needed help up front. The right choice probably would have been Lillard, or taking a gamble on Drummond, or, trading down for two later picks in the first round, or a veteran player.

Every once in a while, you just have to take a gamble. Take a risk. If you play it safe all the time, you'll never walk on the moon. Petrie took a risk when he went after C. Webb. He took a risk when he drafted Peja and then drafted J. Will, neither popular choices at the time. For some reason, he doesn't seem to be the same person. When your young, and your running through the woods and you come to that log across the stream, you just bounce across and continue on. When you come to that same log 30 or 40 years later, you stop and think about it, and perhaps you don't cross it.
 
"Kings basketball president Geoff Petrie has to go, and he has to take the entire basketball operations staff with him."

That's right, entire Kings basketball operations staff has to go out the door with Petrie. I'd go further and fire Keith Smart and let Alex English take over as head coach on an interim basis to see what he can do rest of the season. That is, unless a big NBA name head coach could be immediately brought in. Maybe a Jerry Sloan or Jeff Van Gundy might be possible if given Popovich-type position of head coach and GM - or at least GM in everything but name. While at it I'd fire Grant Napear and Jerry Reynolds and hire Jim Gray and Bill Walton - or somebody, anybody. I'd ax Slamson and come up with new and different Kings mascott. This whole thing is old, stale, going nowhere, and I'm in a frustrated, booing, surly mood.
 
I say Hooray for Aileen Voison finally addressing the elephant in the room. Someone finally has the cajones to get it out in the open. It is inexcusable that Petrie didnt make a public statement about the two suspensions. He owes the the media, and fans his thoughts and comments about this fiasco. For too long we as fans have looked the other way and hoped that because of his past success he could duplicate it again. Well folks, it aint happening...ever. He is tired, bored, complacent and ready to be put out to pasture. His mantra now is "duck and run for cover". He just doesnt seem to care and it translates to every other part of the organization.

I doubt anyone could succeed with the Maloofs owning this team but after six years Petrie has been given ample time and its time to move on. It couldnt really get any worse. The whole organization needs to be replaced. Ownership, the GM, the staff, the coach, and the players. What a freaking mess.

Speaking of "finally," I think I've finally come to the same conclusion as Voisin. Geoff Petrie may not be the cause of all the problems but his successor could just manage to infuse a new perspective into the situation.
 
2923.jpg
 
On two different occasions, I was able to sit down with Reynolds and just shoot the bull for an extended period of time. It was a long time ago, and then, if you kept buying the beer, he kept sitting there and relating stories.(he no longer drinks by the way) Once was at the Fair Oaks sports bar and grill. Don't be fooled by the image he projects on TV. Off camera he's an entirely different person. Knowledgable, and tough minded. Having said that, I wouldn't recommend him for the GM job because I think they need some outside blood to come in and shake things up. I like stability as much as the next person, but right now, management has become so stable, it appears nonexistent at times.

I realize that many have reservations about firing Petrie because of who might replace him. I understand that, but its apples and oranges. If you truely believe someone isn't doing a good job, you fire them, and deal with the other issues that result from that firing later. Otherwise you have paralysis by analysis. I know its easy to blame the Maloofs. I have no doubt they've meddled. But I just don't think you can blame them for every decision that was made. I doubt they decided to pick up Outlaw. Yes, he's relatively cheap, but there are other players that were just as cheap, or slightly more expensive that would have been better fits, and who were more proven.

The trend that Petrie has been in, is to pick up players that border on being good players potential wise, with the hope they blossom with us. Outlaw, James Johnson, JJ Hickson, Sheldon Williams, Rashon McCants, and yes, I'll throw Thornton into that group. Hey, hitting on one out of maybe 10 ain't bad is it? Instead of going after more veteran players with proven records like Kyle Korver, Lou Williams, etc. If its all about money, then instead of outfitting the team with 4 or 5 cheap average to below average players, combine that money and get one good player. Just look at the results of what the combined salaries of Salmons, Cisco, Brooks, James Johnson and Outlaw has gotten us.

Those salaries add up to $23,245,006.00. Thats a lot of money folks, and with that amount of money, spent more wisely, we could have had at least two very good basketball players, maybe three. You tell me, are we getting our moneys worth? I think not! Does any thought go into these player decisions? Are they just knee jerk reactions of the moment.

Who would you rather have on the team right now. Garcia, or Korver? I think most would say Korver. Guess what, Garcia makes more money than Korver. Yeah, I know we drafted Cisco, but I'm trying to make a point. In the previous draft to the recent one, when it was our turn to pick in the second round there were two players sitting there that I had on my list. Tyler Honeycutt and Chandler Parsons. I had Parsons rated ahead of Honeycutt. I just thought he was bigger, and overall more skilled than Honeycutt. So we took Honeycutt, who is now playing in the D-League, probably waiting for his next injury, while Parsons is the starting SF for Houston. And in my opinion, he's a better SF than anyone desguised as one on our team. Did the Maloofs make that choice? I doubt it.

Now thats a small mistake, but with big consequences. And there have been a lot of them of late. No bold moves, just conservative safe moves which have netted zero improvement. Was T. Robb a bad choice? No, I don't think so, but the real question should be, was he the right choice? In reality, he was, once again, the safe choice. Great reputation! Hard worker! And, we needed help up front. The right choice probably would have been Lillard, or taking a gamble on Drummond, or, trading down for two later picks in the first round, or a veteran player.

Every once in a while, you just have to take a gamble. Take a risk. If you play it safe all the time, you'll never walk on the moon. Petrie took a risk when he went after C. Webb. He took a risk when he drafted Peja and then drafted J. Will, neither popular choices at the time. For some reason, he doesn't seem to be the same person. When your young, and your running through the woods and you come to that log across the stream, you just bounce across and continue on. When you come to that same log 30 or 40 years later, you stop and think about it, and perhaps you don't cross it.
Your entire post is spot on but the bolded part seems to summarize the whole thing. We are not the same Kings as THE TEAM. Everything else has changed. Just like the 49ers had to pretty much totally clean house to become relevant again, it's time for the Kings to do the same. Thank you, Geoff Petrie, for all the excitement of the good old days...and welcome to your successor, who will hopefully bring the Kings back to relevance.
 
Your entire post is spot on but the bolded part seems to summarize the whole thing. We are not the same Kings as THE TEAM. Everything else has changed. Just like the 49ers had to pretty much totally clean house to become relevant again, it's time for the Kings to do the same. Thank you, Geoff Petrie, for all the excitement of the good old days...and welcome to your successor, who will hopefully bring the Kings back to relevance.

Of course we're all writing Petrie's Kings obituary but he hasn't passed from the scene - yet. I think his contract is up after this season so maybe Maloofs just let him retire with some dignity instead of booting him right now. Then there's the conspiracy theory that means Kings fans are being played for fools regardless if Maloofs are the biggest fools of all - which obviously they are.
 
Of course we're all writing Petrie's Kings obituary but he hasn't passed from the scene - yet. I think his contract is up after this season so maybe Maloofs just let him retire with some dignity instead of booting him right now. Then there's the conspiracy theory that means Kings fans are being played for fools regardless if Maloofs are the biggest fools of all - which obviously they are.

I'm not writing his obituary as such. And I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm making a personal statement - thanking Petrie and looking forward to seeing who the new GM will be, regardless of when it happens. Maybe a bit of stylistic license, nothing more.

:)
 
Even if Petrie is let go, the entire front office won't be cleaned out. Reynolds will find a way to remain and the fact that he has any ear or input to conversation is disturbing. I know Bajaden defended him, but Jerry has been a failure as a GM, coach and broadcaster. I can only imagine he has some deep dark blackmail on the franchise.

The sort of things the front office needs, more advanced scouting and numbers guys, the Maloofs won't pay for. The John Salmons trade was awful to apparently everyone except the Kings front office. The statistics on Salmons decline were readily available. The Kings just seemed aloof about the issue.

So firing Petrie may just be like firing Smart. Taking off the toenail of one giant ugly ogre that refuses to get out of town.
 
The necessary talent to be in last place once again. Reke and Cousins play to their potential every several games and are not cornerstones at this stage of their careers. Role players (Salmons, Outlaw, Johnson, Brooks etc.) just come here to retire and not play to the abilities they had previously shown. The Maloofs obviously deserve much culpability, but the environment has become toxic and Petrie and his inabilities have helped foster it. Any franchise that has sucked this long, and show no signs of improvement and the GM would certainly not survive.

I dont think thats fair. Our head coach might as well be wearing face paint and clown shoes with the circus hes made made of this team for the last year. Same goes for the owners, only in addition to the face paint and clown shoes you can either turn their pockets inside out or cut holes in them. Petrie isnt deserving of any praise here but the blame falls on him only after it falls on the Maloofs and Coach Smart, in that order.

Dont you think that one of the better coaches in the league would be able to yield much better results with this roster? Im positive we would have a better coach IF the Maloofs were financially capable of acquiring one.

I also dont buy the idea of the team being comprised of ill-fitting pieces. Trade away a couple players for a normal sized wing player that can shoot and acquire an above average coach and this team starts winning games.
 
Last edited:
its all about enacting a system. Now if GP cant hire a decent coach as he has his hands tied by the maloofs then getting rid of GP wont yield teh changes we want
 
The Magoofs need to go. Smart needs to go. GP should go on his own, to save his name and integrity. GP is too good for this currently ran organization.
 
I don't think Petrie is a terrible GM, he's probably somewhere in the middle. He had a lot of success early in his career but I think he got complacent during those Adelman years. And then he got lazy, reacting to the changing personnel decisions with quick fixes rather than proactive planning. And now that those playoff teams are a distant memory, he's made some moves that smack of desperation. In some ways he's dealing with limiting factors which are not his fault -- Sacramento has an aging arena which doesn't help to attract free agents and it's obvious that he's been told to limit his spending in recent years. But as the situation now stands, if he was once the right man for the job, he isn't any longer.

If given the choice of who to get rid of, I think everyone here would agree that the Maloofs are at the top of the list. Last season I would have called Smart competent but hardly world class, but so far this season he's shown that he's not up to the task of pushing this young talent forward. That moves him up to #2 on the list -- the longer we delay hiring a coach who can develop these players the more we risk losing them all together and starting over from scratch. And Petrie, I think he'd be doing everyone a favor, himself included, if he just resigned. He's earned a lot of respect throughout his managerial career but right now he looks like an aging player who just doesn't have it anymore and it's hurting his team more than helping.

Best case scenario is that a new ownership group comes in and clears house of all the riffraff (that means you too Napier!). Maybe we should take up a collection?
 
Have any of you really went back and looked at some of your posts concerning players that are going off and what you had to say about them back then? Me for instance, I was a Rubio and Jrue Holiday guy back in 2009. In 2010 of course most of us here were Cousins people. I don't really remember who I wanted with the 2011 pick but I know it wasn't Jimmer. The 2012 pick A lot of us were talking up Barnes, MKG, Robinson and to a lesser extent Kendall Marshall.

The point of all this is that most of us did as good if not a better job at drafting than Petrie did. He shouldn't be put up on this pedestal because frankly, he's made bad FA signings, and done what most of us would have done in the draft anyway.

[puffs chest out] Dang, reading some of my earlier posts... I watch a LOT of college basketball and most of my picks have been pretty good when looking back at them! Even a sleeper I had (Byron Mullens) is coming around in Charlotte. And all you guys reamed me about liking Jrue Holiday! lol :) [/puffs chest out]

But yah.. We are all pretty much on par with Petrie when it comes to draft picks and Petries signings have been for the most part garbage. So why keep him around?
 
Petrie finally speaks.

Geoff Petrie's take on the Kings' 2-8 start
I caught up with Kings basketball president Geoff Petrie this afternoon to get his take on the Kings’ 2-8 start. Here's some of that conversation.

“I don’t think you can avoid. Or record isn’t what we hoped it would be at this point and the major reason for that is that we’ve just struggled mightily on offense. The improvements we’ve made defensively for the most part have been mitigated by not being able to be productive offensively, primarily in the halfcourt.”

On if roster changes need to be made:

“I think in the short term you have to give it a little more time. And maybe there are different lineup combinations that will work better, maybe there are different rotations that will work better. But at some point those things have to be open for discussion. I don’t think this early in the season any teams are looking to be aggressive and make changes.”

On if he has to be more patient with young players:

“To a point. We’re still a young team but we’re not a totally inexperienced team either. But you’re still looking for growth there.”
At the very least, he can confront Smart about the bolded part. The lineups and rotations are out of control.
 
The idea that the Maloofs haven't allowed Petrie to spend and therefor he shouldn't receive a great deal of blame is a fallacy.

The Kings still have the 4th lowest payroll in the league. So while the Maloofs spent a little more, they are by no means big spenders.

Here are the numbers:

TEAM PAYROLLS


2012/13
1. LA Lakers $100,365,744
2. Brooklyn $88,257,129
3. Orlando $84,212,066
4. Miami $84,153,560
5. Philadelphia $80,908,298
6. New York $80,474,660
7. Boston $76,275,774
8. Chicago $74,638,230
9. Memphis $74,127,785
10.LA Clippers $72,861,475
11. Portland $71,584,641
12. Golden State $71,549,736
13. OKC Thunder $69,787,657
14. San Antonio $69,358,646
15. Denver $67,970,254
16. Dallas $67,672,076
17. Detroit $67,483,395
18. Atlanta $66,598,487
19. Washington $66,242,488
20. Indiana $66,108,371
21. Utah $65,551,445
22. Minnesota $64,491,445
23. New Orleans $63,751,581
24. Milwaukee $63,909,521
25. Cleveland $62,687,729
26. Toronto $59,279,035
27. Sacramento $58,136,455
28. Charlotte $58,082,382
29. Phoenix $57,208,596
30. Houston $47,799,154
 
Back
Top