This is a pretty ridiculous thread. People want the team to get better and attract free agents to the team. Firing Mike Brown, a guy who won a unanimous coach of the year, is the exact way you turn your franchise into a joke and assure no one wants to come here.
I think that has more to do with other aspects of playing for the Kings.How many votes will Mike Brown get for COY for this season?
Monte had several trades and offers in mind, according to reports, where the players simply would not come to the Kings. And that is with Brown as coach. Of course, there may have been other factors involved but a stellar coach apparently was not enough of an attraction. Perhaps the Kings need a charismatic coach of some sort. Then the top stars would flock to the franchise. (or not)
How many votes will Mike Brown get for COY for this season?
Monte had several trades and offers in mind, according to reports, where the players simply would not come to the Kings. And that is with Brown as coach. Of course, there may have been other factors involved but a stellar coach apparently was not enough of an attraction. Perhaps the Kings need a charismatic coach of some sort. Then the top stars would flock to the franchise. (or not)
How many votes will Mike Brown get for COY for this season?
Monte had several trades and offers in mind, according to reports, where the players simply would not come to the Kings. And that is with Brown as coach. Of course, there may have been other factors involved but a stellar coach apparently was not enough of an attraction. Perhaps the Kings need a charismatic coach of some sort. Then the top stars would flock to the franchise. (or not)
Sacramento not being a FA or trade destination is not MB fault. It has been that way since the Kings have been in Sacramento. I think it’s the perception by young athletes that there is nothing to do or no night life in Sacramento. Sacramento has never been a free agent destination, even during the golden years of the Webber/Peja/Bibby era.
I’ve noticed that players don’t want to go to Sacramento voluntarily, but once they are on the team, a lot of players fall in love the city and the fans. Look at Chris Webber's love for the city and we have 2 stars in Fox and Sabonis that seem to love the city.
This is absolutely true but there are 4-6 teams that are free agent deserts and Sacramento has traditionally been one of them (Portland and Utah are in that class as well).Less than half the teams in the league are free agent destinations
This is absolutely true but there are 4-6 teams that are free agent deserts and Sacramento has traditionally been one of them (Portland and Utah are in that class as well).
I like consistency. MB has had one good year and one average year. I share many of the same criticisms for him people here express. Better rotations, and timeout usage to change game flow. Willing to adjust lineups more. Who ever is in charge of challenges. I thought we should have seen more Sasha and Ellis early in the season, HB to the bench, havent been a fan of Hueter, Davion or Javale. I think out role players need to improve and give Mike the chance for a best 2 out of 3 season record.
I agree firing him now would be seen as a vlade level move and reinforce the "lol kings" mentality.
I think loosing Jordi is going to be big.
So one underwhelming season is enough to do away with one good season? That’s the exact line of thinking that ruins a franchise and turns us into a joke. It's crazy how fans of a team, that has known nothing but the bottom of the western division for 16 seasons, can already want to fire a coach a year removed from the first unanimous COTY. I can't even comprehend that line of thinking. This is akin to Pete D'Alessandro firing Michael Malone, absolutely ridiculous and we would be the laughing stock of the NBA again.
And I say underwhelming season, but this season the western conference has basically seven 50 win teams, if you count the two 49 win teams. This season was ridiculous hard, and yet we still did well against all the playoffs teams outside of the Pelicans. Our record this season would put us in the playoffs for pretty much any other season.
Minnesota - they have a history of bad ownership and you'd think hell no but they also pulled the whole Joe Smith stunt. They signed AK47 away from Utah when I think the Kings would have loved him, and Chauncey Billups in 2000 where he finally started to show he was an NBA player.
Indiana - apparently we were after Siakam and he chose them over us. That right there says a lot.
Memphis - TN is a tax advantaged state but their list of signings is unimpressive. They also have a rich history of local talent. Perhaps it is a desire to escape or the city's high crime rate. But culturally, if they were winning it could be an attractive destination.
Orlando - Tax advantaged state, family town, takes a back seat to Miami but many athletes have offseason homes there. Should be better than they are, but top pulled in Rashard Lewis, Hedo, Ho Grant when he was key to the Bulls first run of championships, and T-Mac in his prime.
New Orleans - I think this is bad ownership. Party city, great food, a rich Black history. Being high up the murder capital rankings annually is a problem though. If they could ever put a contender together for more than a season or two they could be a destination.
All of the above I would rate above Portland, Sacramento and Utah. Orlando well above.
Oklahoma City - Not enough data but I think ownership there prefers to build through the draft and might be cheap because they move players before paying them all the time.
No, it's also 100% the (incorrect, but promoted by the bigger CA cities) that Sacramento is a cowtown. And well frankly, too white.Sacramento: It's not the location, it has been bad ownership
I don’t think 10 games over .500 in a stacked west is an average year IMO. Especially when you consider the injuries we had during what was considered the second toughest remaining schedule in the west.
No, it's also 100% the (incorrect, but promoted by the bigger CA cities) that Sacramento is a cowtown. And well frankly, too white.
Nightlife is also sub par. Same issues affecting Portland and Utah.
Either this year or next will be his last - I will quote this thread when it happens.Slater and Amick report in the Athletic’s Kings postmortem that Brown’s 4th year (2025/26) is a mutual option. He’s looking for an extension, but ownership hasn’t offered one yet, preferring a “wait and see approach” so far. More here:
https://theathletic.com/5434131/202...mike-brown-future/?source=user_shared_articleDangerous games: What’s next for Mike Brown, Vivek Ranadivé and the Sacramento Kings
While I think it's petty it's somewhat noteworthy that Fox has complained about CA taxes many times on twitter/x.Yup, plus taxes are horrendous in California, without the benefit of the night life that the Warriors and Lakers/Clippers players can enjoy.
No, it's also 100% the (incorrect, but promoted by the bigger CA cities) that Sacramento is a cowtown. And well frankly, too white.
Nightlife is also sub par. Same issues affecting Portland and Utah.
While I think it's petty it's somewhat noteworthy that Fox has complained about CA taxes many times on twitter/x.
No. It's the thing I said before that. It's why Brad Miller is our resident alumnus.So bad ownership has not been an issue? It's mostly the nightlife situation?
"Don't criticize what you can't understand." (Nobel prize winning poet/songwriter.)
Apparently you missed earlier posts that expressed giving Brown another year to develop this team and its functions.
No. It's the thing I said before that. It's why Brad Miller is our resident alumnus.
There's more to night life than clubbing, for that matter.
and yet, Chris Webber of all people was totally fine in Sacramento, when he discovered that the team was good and a real contender
Nah, he was fine when he learned that people cared about him.
That happened almost immediately.
He still cares.