Finley chooses Spurs over Heat, Suns

KingKong

Starter
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/columns/storycolumnist=stein_marc&id=2147720

By Marc Stein
ESPN.com

The team that won the Michael Finley Sweepstakes is the same team that just won an NBA championship.

Finley told ESPN.com on Wednesday that he has chosen to sign with the San Antonio Spurs, spurning a richer offer from the Miami Heat and the lure of an emotional return to the Phoenix Suns to reunite with close friend Steve Nash.


The Dallas Mavericks tried for weeks to move Finley to an Eastern Conference team to prevent him from joining the Spurs or the Suns. When it couldn't swing a trade before the Aug. 15 deadline to exercise the NBA's new amnesty clause, Dallas reluctantly waived the two-time All-Star, making Finley an unrestricted free agent and the target of an intense two-week courtship that also involved the Detroit Pistons and Minnesota Timberwolves.



Miami's Pat Riley, Phoenix's Amare Stoudemire and Minnesota's Kevin Garnett were among the big names to fly to Chicago last week to make face-to-face pitches to Finley. In the end, he went with the team that sent a one-man delegation  Spurs coach Gregg Popovich -- to Finley's hometown.



The complete structure of the deal with San Antonio hasn't been finalized, including the length of the contract, but Finley will receive a starting salary of roughly $2.5 million this season.



"To be a part of a championship team, I'm excited," Finley said. "This is the closest I've ever been to a championship. I'm looking forward to the challenge of helping this team repeat."



Asked why he picked San Antonio, Finley said: "In a nutshell, they're already a championship team but they have room for improvement. And I feel my game can help them in the areas where they need improvement."



Landing Finley, 32, completes an impressive summer haul for the Spurs, who felt a need to be as aggressive as they've ever been in free agency after struggling to holds leads of 2-0 and 3-2 over Detroit in a taut-as-possible NBA Finals. They expect Finley to supply off-the-bench punch and a reliable 3-point stroke as the third wing of a swing trio that features All-Star guard Manu Ginobili and defensive specialist Bruce Bowen.



Since free agency began July 1, San Antonio has also re-signed playoff hero Robert Horry, added wily Argentinean post man Fabricio Oberto to the frontcourt rotation and Monday signed fiery veteran point guard Nick Van Exel, Finley's former Dallas teammate.



Popovich's foremost challenge next season will be massaging playing time and egos with a roster far deeper than the Spurs typically carry. It remains to be seen, for starters, what role remains for Brent Barry, who was San Antonio's marquee newcomer last summer.



Yet it's a challenge Popovich welcomes, after lengthy struggles to find a bench spark in the wake of Ginobili's emergence and knowing that the Spurs' perimeter shooting could use an upgrade to capitalize on the ability of Tim Duncan and Ginobili to collapse defenses. It's believed that Van Exel, like Horry, isn't interested in heavy minutes during the regular season and wants badly to fit in with the Spurs for a shot at a championship. It was also clear during the playoffs that San Antonio could use a playoff-tested alternative at point guard to the up-and-down Tony Parker, whose only backup last season was untested rookie Beno Udrih.



Missing out on Finley, meanwhile, comes as a blow to the Suns more than any other spurned suitor. With Nash as lead recruiter, and banking on Finley's fond feelings for the desert after starting his career there in 1995, Phoenix was hoping to land the 10-year veteran to start him in the guard slot vacated by Joe Johnson. Finley would have joined Raja Bell, Boris Diaw and the returning Jim Jackson in a group approach to replacing Johnson.



The Suns, though, could only offer Finley a veteran minimum salary of $1.1 million for next season. Failing to land Finley doesn't necessarily knock Phoenix from its top-two perch in the West, after the Suns made their own series of roster tweaks, but figures to make it tougher for them to close the gap on the team that knocked Phoenix out in last spring's Western Conference finals.

The Heat, widely regarded as the favorites in the Finley chase, were offering a starting salary at the full mid-level exception ($5 million) and the chance to team with Shaquille O'Neal and Dwyane Wade. Yet with the Heat already having added Antoine Walker, Jason Williams and James Posey in a five-team trade last month, Finley ultimately decided to pass on seeing how he'd fit into that mix. Instead he joins a club known for meshing quickly, with Duncan serving as the only constant on three very different championship teams.



Finley's decision will also come as a blow to the Mavericks and particularly star forward Dirk Nowitzki, who with Finley and Nash formed what was known in Dallas as a close-like-brothers Big Three. The Mavericks didn't want to see Finley follow Nash to Phoenix, but they were rooting against San Antonio, too, hoping their former face of the franchise would choose Miami or Detroit after the fruitless trade attempts.



The Mavericks decided they had to waive Finley because the amnesty clause will spare Dallas future luxury-tax payments on the nearly $52 million it still owes him. Mavericks owner Mark Cuban estimates the total savings over the next three seasons to be closer to $90 million, because Finley will receive his remaining Dallas salary in annual installments of less than $5 million.



Marc Stein is the senior NBA writer for ESPN.com. To e-mail him, click here. Also, click here to send a question for possible use on ESPNEWS.
 
Last edited:
Holy jesus they got Van Exel and Finley. For the love of christ they are the Roman Empire at this point.
 
Last edited:
They will still be great defenders with their starting 5. What troubles me now is that their offensively very dangerous.
 
Now I definitely hate FINLEY, I don't know if he joined them in hopes of winning a championship, whatever it is, I hope the spurs don't make the playoff........for the love of god.........what is going on?
 
tyrant said:
finley + van excel

there goes their defense

Only way Van Exel and Finley mess up the Spurs defense is if they go out there and set screens on Duncan, Mohammed, Horry, Ginobili and Bowen instead of playing defense. If using Glenn Robinson and Brent Barry at times last season didn't ruin their defense, don't get your hopes up for a different set of aging perimeter scorers doing it.

It doesn't really matter if they play matador defense all year because they have teammates who help out and who rebound the ball. These guys were brought in to score the ball off the bench, not to be a defensive upgrade.
The Spurs know exactly what they're doing. When Parker goes through one of his slumps, NVE gets more minutes because he will be aggressive with the ball. When the Spurs face a team that doesn't have a prime-time scorer for Bowen to lock down, Finley gets a few more minutes in each half because of his shooting. Even if he doesn't work out, at least you never gave the Heat a chance to have him be a perfect fit and then potentially have to face him in the Finals.
 
Why do we still play the NBA season to name the champion? Because teams that look good on paper usually never champs.

Look at the 03-04 Lakers. Shaq, Kobe, GP, and the Mailman equaled no championship, even though before the season people like you were saying stuff like that...the "Why should we even play a season" BS.

Names mean nothing, its how the team competes day in day out, and their chemistry on defense and offense. Its funny how none of you have learned that even after watching the Detroit Pistons take the title that was "suppose" to be for the Lakers in 2004, which then caused that whole dynasty to crumble.

I'll say it right now: The San Antonio Spurs will not repeat.
 
I don't think this will be a 03-04 Lakers case because they'll be coming off the bench for scoring. Nor are they Malones or Paytons.

But you're right, Netguy, it matters how they compete each time.
 
Last edited:
This is good news. He didn't go to Phoenix which increases our chances of winning the division and getting the 2 or 3 seed. Yeah it makes San Antonio tougher, but something will happen that weakens them. Something always happens to level the field a bit.
 
hes following malones footstep.. piggybacking for a championship. i seriously hope he doesnt win one. atleast if he had gone to the heat, it would give him little credibility in my opinion.
 
I don't care if they get injured cause I wouldn't wanna win like that and I don't like to wish people to get injured, but I sure hope these transactions screw them so bad that we anihilate them.
 
ONEZERO said:
I don't care if they get injured cause I wouldn't wanna win like that and I don't like to wish people to get injured, but I sure hope these transactions screw them so bad that we anihilate them.

i'll take whatever breaks fall our way. i don't think the mavs of 2003 are exactly cursing the webber knee incident.

*of course, i'm not wishing injuries, but still. =)
 
hrdboild said:
This is good news. He didn't go to Phoenix which increases our chances of winning the division and getting the 2 or 3 seed. Yeah it makes San Antonio tougher, but something will happen that weakens them. Something always happens to level the field a bit.

More likely we are seeing the birth of a dynasty in San Antonio. A true one -- this was evident even last season. The earlier San Antonio champs could not score and accordingly were some of the weaker champions on record. But the new look Spurs have finally combined scoring and defense, and have a chance to be a truly Great team now (if they can get past their patches of mental weakness).

But I agree in many ways this is better for us than Phoenix or Miami getting him. The Spurs were already going to beat us, this just makes them stronger still but does not change the result when we run into them. If Finley had gone to one of the other teams, it would have strengthened their holds over us as well. I'd rather concentrate the damage to one team rather than have a number of different teams entirely out of our reach.
 
The really scary thing that no one ever talks about is that San Antonio was already a very good offensive team last year. Remember the WCF against Phoenix, they just came out the gate with a run-and-gun style like the Suns and blew them away. Granted, the Suns couldn't play a lick of defense, but part of being a good defender is having good speed, which helps on the offensive and defense ends of the ball. This team will not be stopped, especially considering that this won't mess with their chemistry because Finley and Van Exel will be 5th and 6th men, and if they do interrupt the flow of the team defense (and offense) they can simply be used in fewer minutes. I am sure both of them were told that they would be used in such roles, and accepted it for a shot at a ring. And the Spurs management seems to be smart enough to be rounding up young talent, too, and certainly not content to be sitting on their hands. This team will be the championship favorite for many years to come.
 
He's still in the West so we can blame him for everything. Looks like he's going to get a ring before us and it's all his fault:(. Damn Finley!
 
As for whether or not NVE or Finley think they're going to get big minutes, put that to rest.

NVE said in his press conference yesterday that Pop told him straight up, ther emay be nights when he plays a lot minutes and some nights he might not even see 5 minutes. Nick was fine with it and signed.

He also said Duncan told him: "We'd love to have you but we don't need you." NVE paraphrased it a bit but the statement was truth. Nick still signed.

I'm sure Pop told Michael he'd be coming off the bench, his minutes would be rollercoaster like, but he still signed.
 
Well, I disagree if anyone believes that they are currently a dynasty. They have had a very impressive run of years being constantly a good team, but 3 rings in 7 years is good, but not a dynasty, especially when they have not been able to win back-to-back championships. IMO, to be a dynasty a team must come back again and again to win it all. The Spurs won in 99 in a strike shortened year, in 03 with a good team but then fell off again in 04, to win with a still more reconfigured team in 05. All those off years and retooling makes me think that there are 3 distinct teams, or at least 2 1/2, indicating good management building around some good pieces (Duncan and Pop). A dynasty should only be when a team can return year after year and keep winning, not a team that wins one year and then has to go back and shuffle the deck a little bit. Don't get me wrong- I hardly want to knock them, they are having a phenomenal run, just not a dynasty.
 
damn man.... we couldnt beat the spurs before, but now we really cant beat them.... oh well hopefully we wont get swept in our meetings this season.... but hey, the mavs and suns are still beatable..... that should mean something right?

blame finley..... now we really have a reason to....
 
captain bill said:
Well, I disagree if anyone believes that they are currently a dynasty. They have had a very impressive run of years being constantly a good team, but 3 rings in 7 years is good, but not a dynasty, especially when they have not been able to win back-to-back championships. IMO, to be a dynasty a team must come back again and again to win it all. The Spurs won in 99 in a strike shortened year, in 03 with a good team but then fell off again in 04, to win with a still more reconfigured team in 05. All those off years and retooling makes me think that there are 3 distinct teams, or at least 2 1/2, indicating good management building around some good pieces (Duncan and Pop). A dynasty should only be when a team can return year after year and keep winning, not a team that wins one year and then has to go back and shuffle the deck a little bit. Don't get me wrong- I hardly want to knock them, they are having a phenomenal run, just not a dynasty.

No, that was at least in part my point -- they were NOT a dynasty, and I was not terribly impressed with either one of their earlier title teams. But this new group is looking like it has a real chance to be -- this past season they learned how to score as well as defend, and with Duncan/Manu/Paker, their core is young enough to be serious challengers for the next 5 years. So if there is a dynasty in San Antonio, it is one that really came together for them this past season and will be going into the future, not the "excuse me" champs of earlier years who popped up whenever there was nobody bettert o win it.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top