ESPN on tanking & the Kings as "long-term losers"

[pshn80]

In my view none of our shots are used up or not available for anybody else who can make them. We could easily handle a new Kings who is a scorer and needs his shots. If a guy scores let him keep shooting until he stops making them.

If a new player comes in an d can make shots in a real team effort that's all I want.

 

[Gary]

Chalmers and Jordan both went well before Ewing and Singletary

Yes I know that, but did you read the part where I said there were a lot of late first rounders being sold for cash, and second round picks being traded for future considerations? We really could have got one or both if that's what we wanted. Believe me, I was on the forum voicing my displeasure that we weren't involved in the purchasing of late first round picks to nab one of those two.

 

[VF21]

Yes I know that, but did you read the part where I said there were a lot of late first rounders being sold for cash, and second round picks being traded for future considerations? We really could have got one or both if that's what we wanted. Believe me, I was on the forum voicing my displeasure that we weren't involved in the purchasing of late first round picks to nab one of those two.

Reality check: You're always voicing your displeasure about one thing or another.

 

[Kingsguy881]

Dude......you don't get it. When players cut they want someone to throw them the ball. That doesn't happen on this team nearly enough. He may not want 20 shots a night but he will want 7-10. Where are those 7-10 shots going to come? Who are you going to take them from?

Seeing as how the projected top three players CREATE a lot of shots off hustle plays, they wouldn't necessarily be taking shots away from anyone. You should be asking whose minutes they would take away, that would be a much more valid question than whose shots because those players impact the game moreso DEFENSIVELY than OFFENSIVELY, which for some reason you don't seem to be able to grasp....