DNA frees man after 24 years in prison

Status
Not open for further replies.

atxrocker

Starter
You know, no matter how much I hear about cases like this it really pisses me off.. 24 yrs of someones life is inexcusable. I know this not uncommon and errors happen but man... its just sad.


http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/01/23/dna.exoneration.ap/index.html

DNA frees man after 24 years in prison




Monday, January 23, 2006; Posted: 2:05 p.m. EST (19:05 GMT)

RIGHT]
vert.crotzer.ap.jpg
Alan Crotzer celebrates his freedom Monday after spending more than 24 years in prison.​
[/RIGHT]

B]TAMPA, Florida (AP) -- Alan Crotzer stepped into the warm sunlight outside the courthouse Monday and raised his arms to the sky, celebrating his freedom after more than 24 years behind bars for crimes he didn't commit.

A judge freed the 45-year-old Crotzer after DNA testing and other evidence convinced prosecutors he was not involved in the 1981 armed robbery and rapes that led to his 130-year prison sentence.
"It's been a long time coming," said Crotzer, his black hair graying at the temples. "Thank God for this day."
Crotzer walked free more than three years after he wrote to the Innocence Project in New York, a legal clinic that seeks to exonerate inmates through DNA testing.
"Are you ready for what you waited so long to hear?" Circuit Judge J. Rogers Padgett said to Crotzer during the brief hearing. "Motion granted -- you're a free man."
Members of Crotzer's family and other courtroom spectators clapped and cheered as a bailiff removed the shackles from his wrists and ankles.
Prosecutor Mike Sinacore congratulated him. "Trying to fix an error in the system is just as important as trying to convict someone who is guilty," he said.
DNA has been used to clear at least 172 people wrongly convicted of crimes in 31 states since 1989, according to the Innocence Project.
Crotzer and brothers Douglas James and Corlenzo James were convicted of robbing a Tampa family in 1981. Douglas James and Crotzer were also found guilty of kidnapping and raping a 38-year-old woman and her 12-year-old girl at gunpoint.
A victim picked Crotzer out of a photo lineup. But Douglas James says Crotzer is innocent. He said he and his brother were the rapists and a childhood friend was their accomplice.
Crotzer, who has never held a paying job, said he will go live with a sister in St. Petersburg and try to find work. His attorneys said they will seek compensation from the state for him.
In December, Gov. Jeb Bush signed a bill allowing Wilton Dedge to receive $2 million for the 22 years he spent in prison for a rape he did not commit. Dedge, 44, also was exonerated by DNA evidence.
"There ain't no compensation for what they done to me," said Crotzer, whose mother died while he was in prison. "But I'm not bitter."
Crotzer said he was looking forward to a barbecue with his family, who promised him his favorites -- pork chops and banana pudding. Then, he said, he wanted to take a bath in a real bathtub.
"I want to soak," he said. "I want to get some of this off me."
 
Last edited:
Wow. What a poor guy. What could he do in a case like this? Is he compensated for anything? Or is it just like "Yeah, our bad. You can leave now." He's 45 now, and he was locked up for 24 years, meaning he was locked up at 21... honestly, he was just a kid. There's a huge era of his life he'll never get back.

EDIT*

Just read the bottom half.. ignore what I said.
 
Last edited:
The only bright side I see to this is that at least he got some financial compensation. I believe there are laws in some states that wont compensate people who were wrongly convicted ( I think they have to sign something saying they wont sue). I would love it if attorneys who convict innocent people had to go to prison for the same amount of time.
 
gina said:
The only bright side I see to this is that at least he got some financial compensation. I believe there are laws in some states that wont compensate people who were wrongly convicted ( I think they have to sign something saying they wont sue). I would love it if attorneys who convict innocent people had to go to prison for the same amount of time.

hey gina, I would love that too... because in my eyes they deserve it if they can sleep at night putting a man away for 24+ yrs and not give a crap. they should spend every single day experiencing those things wrongly convicted of a crime and not driving BMW'S and living the life. its freakin pathetic. really sad... I just feel so bad for these people. I am 24 right now.. I simply could not imagine living my whole lifetime in prison WRONGLY.
 
Prosecuting attorneys present the evidence. The jury decides whether the evidence is sufficient for a conviction.

It's not a perfect system. It's evolved and continues to evolve but there will always be mistakes. The victim picked him out of a lineup. Eyewitnesses routinely describe perpetrators and their actions incorrectly but they're still considered to be valuable evidence of guilt.

As I said, it's not a perfect system but I can't think of a better one.
 
Um, we're talking about life and death, not a basketball game. If your life was on the line, you might have a different perspective.
 
Wow, I really hate hearing such tragic things. What he should do now is take some Accounting courses so he can learn how to budget his money. Chances of him finding employment is about zero.

#1 Reason I am apposed to the death penalty, and thank goodness he did not receive it.
 
Actually the point was not that he COULD have recived the the death penelty for the charges he faced. (Although Rape was a capital offinse in many states up unitll the 1070's) The point was that as bad a mistake it is to lock up an innocent man for 25 years, the accepted risk of incarceration as a form of punnishment, it is a far WORSE mistak to execute an innocent man, the accepted risk of capital punishment. And yes these mistakes happen as well.
 
gina said:
The only bright side I see to this is that at least he got some financial compensation. I believe there are laws in some states that wont compensate people who were wrongly convicted ( I think they have to sign something saying they wont sue). I would love it if attorneys who convict innocent people had to go to prison for the same amount of time.

Wow. I prosecute on a daily basis and this type of situation is always on my mind, as it is with almost every other DDA that I know. While this kind of thing is rare but tragic, I'm certainly glad that this type of reactionary thinking doesn't enter into policy making in states. No offense, but that is truly ignorant. I don't know all the facts of the case, but I have seen nothing that indicates prosecutorial misconduct of any kind. This site http://www.innocenceproject.org/case/display_profile.php?id=167 has a little more of the specifics and it looks like he received a fair trial. It certainly appears as if he is not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt now, but a jury found that he was guilty then. Again, tragic. Solution? I don't know. But throwing the prosecutors in jail for doing their jobs? Insane. I don't know about your state, but victims in my jurisdiction deserve prosecutors who are allowed to vigorously prosecute when the evidence they have on hand indicate that the suspect is guilty.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top