I think they got this one right, whether Dwight's blocks go out of bounds or not. He still blocks/alters more shots than anyone else, and doesn't really have any other reasonably good defenders on his team.
yeah, i guess. DPOY is much more of an individual award than MVP, so i guess howard doesn't get points deducted for his team being average defensively.
if you look at it closely, it basically comes down to his superb block numbers. if you look at defensive rebounds and not total rebounds (which i think should be the case for DPOY arguments), he's not that far ahead of the pack.
If you're taking a possession away from the other team by grabbing an offensive rebound, that helps your team defensively.
but he gives them back that possession when he blocks out of bounds.
actually, i only half-agree with that argument. it's almost like saying "making your shots helps your team defensively because it limits the fast break." true, but not really what i think would be classified as defense.
I didn't realize 94.4 ppg was an average team defensively (they are 6th in the league). They also play a pretty high pace (12th) and their team as a whole has the best defensive rating in the league.
Sans Howard, they are very mediocre, if that. All the more reason why the league got this right.
No he doesn't. He just doesn't take away a possession. And I get the argument, and wish he would control the ball more often rather than give the other team the ball out of bounds. But it's still a blocked shot, without which, you're giving up points (considering the fact that the majority of his blocks are from close range). Let's not penalize him for blocking shots.
And my point about grabbing offensive rebounds is not to say that it qualifies a person for DPOY. Just that it helps your team defense. It does.
Howard is 2nd in the league at defensive rebounding. Do you really think Troy Murphy has a case for DPOY because he's a better defensive rebounder?
I didn't realize 94.4 ppg was an average team defensively (they are 6th in the league). They also play a pretty high pace (12th) and their team as a whole has the best defensive rating in the league. Cleveland gave up less points but they also play at a much slower pace than the Magic do.
It's not like LBJ isn't the only solid defender on Cleveland (Anderson, Ben, Z are all + defenders. While on Orlando the only guys I would consider solid defenders other than Dwight are role players (Foyle)
http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/ORL/2009.html
http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/CLE/2009.html
maybe not murphy, but if we're just going to go on stats, then camby's not that far off this season: 11.1 rpg (8.5 def, 2.6 off, which is half of howard's offensive boards), 2.1 bpg, slightly lower in steals, but half the turnovers (which does not help your team on defense).
like i said originally, i'd rather go with lebron. best defensive player on one of the league's top defensive teams, while howard is the best defensive player on an average team (which possibly adds to his stats). my point isn't that howard shouldn't get the award, but that it's more of a default. back when ben wallace won with his rebounding and block numbers on a defensively loaded pistons team, now that was earning the award.
while howard is the best defensive player on an average team (which possibly adds to his stats).
Again I point out why are you calling Orlando an average team or average defensive team. This is almost idiotic.
This was my point. They are very good defensively but he's really the only reason.
why am i being called almost idiotic here???was unclear that i meant that without howard, the magic are an average team (both overall and defensively)?
So with him they are elite defensively and pretty solid offensively. While Cavs without LBJ would probally still be elite defensively and horrible offensively? If 1 player makes you an elite defensive player, why wouldn't you give him the award? And you never said without Howard they are average, you kept repeating average defensive team. Howard would make the Kings an above average defensive team if that's possible. LBJ I'm not as sure about. Post defenders are just more important--and why most post players win the award.
So with him they are elite defensively and pretty solid offensively. While Cavs without LBJ would probally still be elite defensively and horrible offensively?
cool, thanks for the links. do they have the same links for both teams without howard or lebron?
ok, i hate to ask you this, but i am completely illiterate when it comes to that site; i've tried navigating through it before.who was the top Drated player for the past two years, was it garnett and camby (i think the DPOY two years ago)? i just want to see if the league was consistent in using this as a gauge for DPOY.
hmmm. ok, so i haven't looked at what the methodology is for D-rating, but will go ahead and assume that it's a valid measure for this argument.
according to those rankings, dwight howard was at about 9th in 2008 and 2007, and jumped up to 1st in 2009. however, no other magic player was in the top 20 last year, and none in the top 7 this year (i think). looking at the list though, I'd still give it to LeBron and here's why.
in 2007, 4 cavs were in the top 20 (lebron, Z, varejao, and gooden), but in 2008, none of them were (which is actually really sruprising). then in 2009 according to your post, lebron, varejao, and Z are in the top 10, and all have jumped significantly in their rankings. i really do think that that is the direct result of LeBron committing himself to defense this year.