Dear Sacto: You blew it

Heuge

Starter
Dear Sacto: You blew it
By Tom Friend, ESPN The Magazine
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/columns/story?id=2005105


TO: The state capitol of California
FROM: Washington Wizard fans (all six of us)

We saved you once, but you're on your own now, Sacramento.

We took Mitch Richmond off your hands seven years ago, gave you our best player, Chris Webber, and made you a big-league town.

With us, Webber shot ridiculous 3s. With you, he triple-doubled.
With us, he got caught with dope. With you, he got caught with supermodels.

You have no idea how badly you fleeced us. Our owner (still in charge) and our GM (long gone) thought there would be life after Webber, thought Richmond still had legs left, thought Juwan Howard needed the low post all to himself. What a laugh.

We all knew it was a mistake the day it happened, that ugly day, May 14, 1998. You can't replace someone who's 6-foot-10 with eyes in the back of his head. You ever seen that guy pass?

If you're ever going to trade that guy -- and I don't care if he's got a bum knee and a contract like an anvil -- you get something back. Something young. Something with a long-term upside. Not Mitch Richmond. And not Kenny Thomas, Corliss Williamson and Brian Skinner.

You had your chance, Sacramento. You were an eyelash from a championship just three years ago -- if only you would've stuck a hand in Robert Horry's face -- so why are you giving up so soon? Some people say your window was already shut, but not me. When the Lakers chose Kobe over Shaq, that put the West up for grabs. Phoenix may have a gaudy record, but in the playoffs, they'd better learn to play halfcourt offense. Seattle shoots too many jumpers. Dallas, too. Over a 7-game series, both those teams are going to need an inside presence.

But you guys already had that inside-outside threat, and instead all you have now is outside. It could've been you and San Antonio in the Western Finals, but your GM, Geoff Petrie, decided to smooch up to free-agent-to-be Peja Stojakovic, and now you're suddenly on your way back to the Wayman Tisdale era. Now you're window is shut.

Peja's your cornerstone? Face it: Basically, you're Dallas now. Yes, when you're shooting well, you can be a bear. And, yes, you just stole a game in Philly, and, yes, you even stole a game against my Wizards. But that's only because Mike Bibby was throwing in bombs and we coughed up a 7-point lead in the last five minutes.

Trust us, now you're going to learn the hard way. Bibby, Peja, Mobley and Brad Miller ain't winning a championship, folks. It was Webber who drew the double-teams, Webber who took the pressure off Peja, Webber who began the Kings' culture of sharing the ball, Webber who got you respect with the refs. It could take seven years to get back in the mix. Trust me, we just lived it.

When we traded Webber, we became Clippers East. First we were abysmal, then we got desperate and then we just kept digging ourselves deeper. Richmond, Howard and Rod Strickland never clicked together, and because we had no offensive post presence, we blindly traded a young mountain named Ben Wallace to Orlando for Ike Austin. Brilliant.
 
...continued
Even MJ couldn't save us. He spent a season as team president, and, just our luck, Yao Ming couldn't free himself to enter the draft that year. With the No. 1 pick, we settled for Kwame Brown when Pau Gasol was sitting there. But MJ didn't know Pau Gasol from Kung Pao Chicken.

Then MJ decided to play himself, on loan from Chicago, but we knew it was only a two-year band-aid. An old Michael was better than an old Mitch Richmond, but we never played a single game in May. C-Webb, though, he was always in the playoffs. Every year. Flicking behind the back passes to White Chocolate and then to Peja and later to Bibby. No, C-Webb never won it all, but at least you got to ring your cowbells.

I couldn't stand to watch you play. Whenever I did, I caught myself saying, "What if?'' We could've had a front-line combo of Webber, Ben Wallace and Howard, and we'd have come out of the East one of those years. We'd have played the Lakers in the Finals. Instead, we had to hitch our wagon to Courtney Alexander, Popeye Jones, Christian Laettner. Instead, we learned that, in the NBA, one trade can make you and one trade can empty your building.

So, sorry, Sacramento, it's payback now.

It took us until 2005, but I'd argue that the Wizards have a better upside than you. It took us seven years, but Gilbert Arenas picked us on a whim, and Mark Cuban donated Antawn Jamison and Larry Hughes grew up, and now we're the team with chemistry, now we're the team that can score 100 in our sleep. It took forever, but we're finally over the Webber trade.

And now you've set us free. Now Webber's your cross to bear. You gave him to Allen Iverson for three warm bodies, and you think it looks good because the Sixers and Webber are struggling, but it's going to be your albatross. True, Webber's too soft for the Eastern Conference and, true, he's now playing for a team that doesn't move the ball, but that doesn't get you off the hook. He was a perfect Western Conference player, who fed off of your passing game. He was the first big-man superstar you ever had, the first person to get Ahmad Rashad in your building, and now your management is pompous enough to think they can sacrifice a run at the title and build around a jump shooter. Funny, that's what we thought, too.

Like we said, it's a 7-year wait.

See you in 2012.

Signed,
All six of us
 
This article sums up how I felt right after the trade...I feel a little better now, hopefully I will eventually like the trade.
 
Typical of most EAST COAST "writers" who apparently haven't noticed how well the Kings played without Webber. Also, Webbers days of dominant or even reliable post plays died when he had knee surgery.

Luckily, Petrie puts us one up on most franchises who are "rebuilding."
 
Royal_Court_Dancer said:
doesn't a team have to shoot well to win a game anyway?
we were considered a jump-shooting team with webber too, right?

No, actually he was our last remaining balance. And yes, we kind of are Dallas now. But we've got the pieces to hopefully get beyond that and restore balance with a few smart moves.
 
Last edited:
quick dog said:
They must smoke a lot of weed back there. Who knew?

Lol. Yes they do smoke a lot of weed over here.

Anyway, the only reasons why the wizards are going to the playoffs is because of gilbert arenas and the simple fact that the eastern conference isn't that good. This letter is really irrelevant (sp?).
 
Arenas is MADD NICE! other than that the wizards suck. apparently they are still mad about the loss!
 
Hahahahaha! While I do not agree with everything this writer said, I did enjoy the article. The part that he doesn't get is that the 3 guys he (and others) (and even me at the beginning) thought were scrubs will do well with Adelman and Yoda. Just about everyone improves here. The new guys also brought us some badly needed defense and shot blocking. So, all in all, it will not be any 7 years, but there still was some truth to what he said. Taken with the right attitude (non-defensive), the article was funny.
 
6th said:
Hahahahaha! While I do not agree with everything this writer said, I did enjoy the article. The part that he doesn't get is that the 3 guys he (and others) (and even me at the beginning) thought were scrubs will do well with Adelman and Yoda. Just about everyone improves here. The new guys also brought us some badly needed defense and shot blocking. So, all in all, it will not be any 7 years, but there still was some truth to what he said. Taken with the right attitude (non-defensive), the article was funny.


this article made me laugh too! I agreed with some of it, didn't agree with other parts, but really enjoyed reading it all of it. I definitely agree that we're not going to take 7 years to recover from this trade, but I do think that the article had moments of truth & was fun to read.
 
It's a well written article, and pretty true.

Honestly, I was one of the people who thought that the Kings needed to trade Webber to win a championship, but I agree with whoever wrote the article. The 76ers didn't give up anyone of significance. They kept their young players like Dalembert or Iguodala, and all of the players we got were marginal starters, even on the 76ers, who never had a complimentary All-Star that tenured with AI. I'm not saying the players we got are total scrubs, I just think we could have gotten more, or 1 better player instead of 3 marginal ones. Perhaps we can convince the league to let us put 7 guys on the court.
 
Caesar Rex said:
It's a well written article, and pretty true.

Honestly, I was one of the people who thought that the Kings needed to trade Webber to win a championship, but I agree with whoever wrote the article. The 76ers didn't give up anyone of significance. They kept their young players like Dalembert or Iguodala, and all of the players we got were marginal starters, even on the 76ers, who never had a complimentary All-Star that tenured with AI. I'm not saying the players we got are total scrubs, I just think we could have gotten more, or 1 better player instead of 3 marginal ones. Perhaps we can convince the league to let us put 7 guys on the court.

I think it depends on what Petrie wanted to get. Did he want to get a young guy (or guys) that he would have to get Adelman comfortable with in his system and that he could look to two, three or four years down the road as budding stars? OR, did he want to get guys that could help his three currently budding stars maintain a certain level of respectability (read: playoffs) while looking for other moves to be made this summer that would return the team to true competitiveness?

Wouldn't surprise me in the least if he said yes to question #2. And of the guys he wasn't going to get from the Sixers (other than AI), #1 was Dalembert, and #2 was Iguodala. It's not as if Dalembert is in the type of situation that the Kings like anyway --- he's a restricted free agent (I think) that will probably garner significant offers on the market this summer, and I think the Maloofs have made it quite clear that they are done (over?)spending to make this team a title contender. Not to mention most of Dalembert's points come off of alley-oops, and he's shown no ability to really grasp an offense (or maybe AI just only looks for him on those oops). Iguodala would have been the real prize for the Kings with Cutino's contract situation and Iguodala's blend of athleticism, imho, but I think both the Sixers and Kings knew that going into the negotiations.
 
4cwebb said:
Iguodala would have been the real prize for the Kings with Cutino's contract situation and Iguodala's blend of athleticism, imho, but I think both the Sixers and Kings knew that going into the negotiations.

Yeah! I would love to have had Iggy, but that is out of the question. I am totally happy that he is playing so well with AI. Iggy is from my home town, actually went to school with my nephew.
 
6th said:
Yeah! I would love to have had Iggy, but that is out of the question. I am totally happy that he is playing so well with AI. Iggy is from my home town, actually went to school with my nephew.

Well to steal the thoughts from some people on Sacramento radio (as well as my own) with some sorts of objectivity, this wasn't a basketball move. If it was, you would have seen one of Philly's young guys (more talented/upside) in return for a guy who is still being referred to as the Kings "best player" by those within the organization including the head coach.
 
Last edited:
You know after Webb was traded I'm being very careful not to let myself love this new team and they way they play. I have no idea if these new pieces of our team are permanent or just transitional until the summer. I have a feeling that our 05-06 Kings will have a much different look. What do you think?
 
Heuge said:
...continued
Even MJ couldn't save us. He spent a season as team president, and, just our luck, Yao Ming couldn't free himself to enter the draft that year. With the No. 1 pick, we settled for Kwame Brown when Pau Gasol was sitting there. But MJ didn't know Pau Gasol from Kung Pao Chicken.

Then MJ decided to play himself, on loan from Chicago, but we knew it was only a two-year band-aid. An old Michael was better than an old Mitch Richmond, but we never played a single game in May. C-Webb, though, he was always in the playoffs. Every year. Flicking behind the back passes to White Chocolate and then to Peja and later to Bibby. No, C-Webb never won it all, but at least you got to ring your cowbells.

I couldn't stand to watch you play. Whenever I did, I caught myself saying, "What if?'' We could've had a front-line combo of Webber, Ben Wallace and Howard, and we'd have come out of the East one of those years. We'd have played the Lakers in the Finals. Instead, we had to hitch our wagon to Courtney Alexander, Popeye Jones, Christian Laettner. Instead, we learned that, in the NBA, one trade can make you and one trade can empty your building.

So, sorry, Sacramento, it's payback now.

It took us until 2005, but I'd argue that the Wizards have a better upside than you. It took us seven years, but Gilbert Arenas picked us on a whim, and Mark Cuban donated Antawn Jamison and Larry Hughes grew up, and now we're the team with chemistry, now we're the team that can score 100 in our sleep. It took forever, but we're finally over the Webber trade.

And now you've set us free. Now Webber's your cross to bear. You gave him to Allen Iverson for three warm bodies, and you think it looks good because the Sixers and Webber are struggling, but it's going to be your albatross. True, Webber's too soft for the Eastern Conference and, true, he's now playing for a team that doesn't move the ball, but that doesn't get you off the hook. He was a perfect Western Conference player, who fed off of your passing game. He was the first big-man superstar you ever had, the first person to get Ahmad Rashad in your building, and now your management is pompous enough to think they can sacrifice a run at the title and build around a jump shooter. Funny, that's what we thought, too.

Like we said, it's a 7-year wait.

See you in 2012.

Signed,
All six of us


lol... I thought this article was halarious. I enjoyed it. Too bad his facts are just a bit off but thats what makes it so funny:p

East Coast Writers.. You gotta lov'em;)
 
Other than the fact that this does not put the Kings back into the "Wayman Tisdale Era", I thought this article was fair. We have become Dallas, but with less depth (at least in the backcourt).
 
Heuge said:
This article sums up how I felt right after the trade...I feel a little better now, hopefully I will eventually like the trade.
This article sums up how I felt right after the trade... and how I continue to feel right now...
 
A few right things he said like Webb put Sac on the map but some untrue things said too, IMO. Other than that, I didn't like the article...He don't know much about the Kings, look too much at stats and don't understand why the traded happened which is alright, he's from the East and a Wizard homer...still feeling bad he lost CWebb.
 
Back
Top