Conspiracy theories and a change in the wind

IfAt1st

Starter
I am a strong believer in sports conspiracy theories. I believe professional sports are rigged for the most part, for the betterment of the power players of the leagues (TV, owners, league offices, etc). I believe players are mostly pawns put on the court to perform their role, but superstar players are brought into the fold of the conspiracy and told what's up and given favoritism on the court by the refs for their complicity.
Each side simply pats each other's backs, it's just business after all.
And yes, I believe the Kings had their championship stolen from them in 2002 by this consipiracy.

Which brings me to this post, now.

I believe the Kings are now going to be more favored by the NBA for the foreseeable future.
In fact, I'm going WAY out on a limb and predicting it after seeing only 2 games of results.

I base this on a variety of observations:

* As history, most fans know how badly the Kings have been screwed in every way by the officials on the court the past few years. I watch games as objectively as possible, and I do NOT see calls as consistently bad and unfavorable to a team over the years as the Kings.
It has reached its apex with the ref's collective actions against DMC, who gets technical fouls (and therefore aggregate suspensions which is effectively a fine to him) literally for facial reactions. There has been a ref sitting there watching him like a hawk for any reaction, and when DMC is standing there watching the JumboTron playback, and then reacts in outcry like any player does, the ref staring at him waiting for any reaction, T's him up - that's a travesty of officiating IMO.

* With the recent NBA support for the Kings staying in Sac, and Commissioner Silver attending our game the first week in office, and the slavering over Vivek Ranadive and the entire NBA 3.0 international vision, it is a must that the Kings become a competitive team. India isn't going to get fans following the Kings unless they are a winner. Many people have predicted we may get preferential treatment - it has just waited until now to manifest (didn't want to make it too obvious from the beginning of the season?)

* The last 2 games the Kings have been the recipient of more favorable ref calls than I've seen in the past 7 years combined. <--only mildly hyperbolic

* I noticed something during Demarcus' recent injury-
He seemed calm on the bench as he was watching the game in streetclothes.
He seemed like he was doing his part, staying off the court.
Usually, he'd be internally seething, not getting that playing time and getting his stats to prove his case (that he's one of the best big men in the NBA).
I believe he was told to sit out his ankle injury much longer than he had to. I believe the Kings had to give him a hint that he's the rising star for the team and therefore a face of the international NBA 3.0 vision. I believe the Kings deliberately didn't want to win those 7 games because they have seen how solidly DMC and Gay (and IT lesser-so) are gelling together and they are afraid of winning too many games and losing a good draft spot.

* DMC should have been thrown out both of the last 2 games, if we are being objective and comparing to his history. It's not like he's been on better behavior - he has jawed plenty, he has had run-ins with Mike Dunleavy, and has deliberately initiated contact that previously has gotten him T'd up and thrown out of games. Against Toronto, he needlessly tried to spike Grevious in the backcourt while our PG was walking the ball up. This would normally have been watched intently by the refs and reacted to immediately. But the refs are now letting incidental dumb stuff go with Demarcus. That NEVER used to happen.

* It is HILARIOUS and vindicating to see other players (and teams) blowing a gasket when they are treated like DMC has been. Joakim Noah completely losing it and F-bombing with threatening gestures directly at the refs simply for getting ticky-tack calls shows that DMC isn't alone in not liking getting screwed by refs. I don't see the league and fanbase getting out their pitchforks and suggesting Noah seek psychological counseling after this on-court meltdown, do you? In fact, I don't remember DMC EVER being as bad as Noah was on the court - correct me if I'm forgetting him doing as bad to refs.
Kyle Lowry got himself tossed after a questionable call on the 3-pointer. Hell, it got to Tom Thibadaeu in his postgame conference, and he needed a team meeting the next day to recompose the team. Nice to see other teams have to deal with the absurd frustrations of NBA reffing for a change. It sure impacted the Bulls team, and they are supposedly paragons of NBA solidity.

* We are going to start seeing the rest of the NBA (other team's sportscasters, ESPN, national print media, etc) start writing positive articles about DMC, and spotlighting his good points more. This hackjob he's been getting for years and ridiculous over-focus on being a tough competitor will slowly lessen.
This will be in full bloom by next year at this point in the season, after he's a legitimate (not injury-appointed) All-Star and the Kings have a winning record.


Feel free to ignore or ridicule as you will - I just had to get all that said.
 
I believe the Kings deliberately didn't want to win those 7 games because they have seen how solidly DMC and Gay (and IT lesser-so) are gelling together and they are afraid of winning too many games and losing a good draft spot.

Your conspiracy-fu has failed you here. You see, we didn't need to lose those games, because the NBA is just going to rig the lottery in our favor to give us the #1 overall pick.
 
Maloofs were the worst owners ever. Vivek (and the rest of the ownership group) have deep pockets and vision. NBA is always going to support those kind of owners...And barely tolerate the bad ones. Look at how the worm has turned since the Lakers have gone from Buss Sr. to Buss Jr.

You are only as strong as your weakest link.
 
I am a strong believer in sports conspiracy theories. I believe professional sports are rigged for the most part, for the betterment of the power players of the leagues (TV, owners, league offices, etc). I believe players are mostly pawns put on the court to perform their role, but superstar players are brought into the fold of the conspiracy and told what's up and given favoritism on the court by the refs for their complicity.
Each side simply pats each other's backs, it's just business after all.
And yes, I believe the Kings had their championship stolen from them in 2002 by this consipiracy.

Which brings me to this post, now.

I believe the Kings are now going to be more favored by the NBA for the foreseeable future.
In fact, I'm going WAY out on a limb and predicting it after seeing only 2 games of results.

I base this on a variety of observations:

* As history, most fans know how badly the Kings have been screwed in every way by the officials on the court the past few years. I watch games as objectively as possible, and I do NOT see calls as consistently bad and unfavorable to a team over the years as the Kings.
It has reached its apex with the ref's collective actions against DMC, who gets technical fouls (and therefore aggregate suspensions which is effectively a fine to him) literally for facial reactions. There has been a ref sitting there watching him like a hawk for any reaction, and when DMC is standing there watching the JumboTron playback, and then reacts in outcry like any player does, the ref staring at him waiting for any reaction, T's him up - that's a travesty of officiating IMO.

* With the recent NBA support for the Kings staying in Sac, and Commissioner Silver attending our game the first week in office, and the slavering over Vivek Ranadive and the entire NBA 3.0 international vision, it is a must that the Kings become a competitive team. India isn't going to get fans following the Kings unless they are a winner. Many people have predicted we may get preferential treatment - it has just waited until now to manifest (didn't want to make it too obvious from the beginning of the season?)

* The last 2 games the Kings have been the recipient of more favorable ref calls than I've seen in the past 7 years combined. <--only mildly hyperbolic

* I noticed something during Demarcus' recent injury-
He seemed calm on the bench as he was watching the game in streetclothes.
He seemed like he was doing his part, staying off the court.
Usually, he'd be internally seething, not getting that playing time and getting his stats to prove his case (that he's one of the best big men in the NBA).
I believe he was told to sit out his ankle injury much longer than he had to. I believe the Kings had to give him a hint that he's the rising star for the team and therefore a face of the international NBA 3.0 vision. I believe the Kings deliberately didn't want to win those 7 games because they have seen how solidly DMC and Gay (and IT lesser-so) are gelling together and they are afraid of winning too many games and losing a good draft spot.

* DMC should have been thrown out both of the last 2 games, if we are being objective and comparing to his history. It's not like he's been on better behavior - he has jawed plenty, he has had run-ins with Mike Dunleavy, and has deliberately initiated contact that previously has gotten him T'd up and thrown out of games. Against Toronto, he needlessly tried to spike Grevious in the backcourt while our PG was walking the ball up. This would normally have been watched intently by the refs and reacted to immediately. But the refs are now letting incidental dumb stuff go with Demarcus. That NEVER used to happen.

* It is HILARIOUS and vindicating to see other players (and teams) blowing a gasket when they are treated like DMC has been. Joakim Noah completely losing it and F-bombing with threatening gestures directly at the refs simply for getting ticky-tack calls shows that DMC isn't alone in not liking getting screwed by refs. I don't see the league and fanbase getting out their pitchforks and suggesting Noah seek psychological counseling after this on-court meltdown, do you? In fact, I don't remember DMC EVER being as bad as Noah was on the court - correct me if I'm forgetting him doing as bad to refs.
Kyle Lowry got himself tossed after a questionable call on the 3-pointer. Hell, it got to Tom Thibadaeu in his postgame conference, and he needed a team meeting the next day to recompose the team. Nice to see other teams have to deal with the absurd frustrations of NBA reffing for a change. It sure impacted the Bulls team, and they are supposedly paragons of NBA solidity.

* We are going to start seeing the rest of the NBA (other team's sportscasters, ESPN, national print media, etc) start writing positive articles about DMC, and spotlighting his good points more. This hackjob he's been getting for years and ridiculous over-focus on being a tough competitor will slowly lessen.
This will be in full bloom by next year at this point in the season, after he's a legitimate (not injury-appointed) All-Star and the Kings have a winning record.


Feel free to ignore or ridicule as you will - I just had to get all that said.
tumblr_lpqaeon2kk1qb271wo5_250.gif
 
Pretty much my sentiments actually. Not sure about the losing 7 in a row and keeping DMC out longer... but they likely wanted to give him plenty of rest and time to heal. The injury can be a good excuse to let the body recover a bit.
 
Pretty much my sentiments actually. Not sure about the losing 7 in a row and keeping DMC out longer... but they likely wanted to give him plenty of rest and time to heal. The injury can be a good excuse to let the body recover a bit.

Cousins was starting to slow down a bit as well before the injury and was looking a little more tired with each game, which might have also played into resting him for 7 games.
 
I am a strong believer in sports conspiracy theories. I believe professional sports are rigged for the most part, for the betterment of the power players of the leagues (TV, owners, league offices, etc). I believe players are mostly pawns put on the court to perform their role, but superstar players are brought into the fold of the conspiracy and told what's up and given favoritism on the court by the refs for their complicity.
Each side simply pats each other's backs, it's just business after all.
And yes, I believe the Kings had their championship stolen from them in 2002 by this consipiracy.

Which brings me to this post, now.

I believe the Kings are now going to be more favored by the NBA for the foreseeable future.
In fact, I'm going WAY out on a limb and predicting it after seeing only 2 games of results.

I base this on a variety of observations:

* As history, most fans know how badly the Kings have been screwed in every way by the officials on the court the past few years. I watch games as objectively as possible, and I do NOT see calls as consistently bad and unfavorable to a team over the years as the Kings.
It has reached its apex with the ref's collective actions against DMC, who gets technical fouls (and therefore aggregate suspensions which is effectively a fine to him) literally for facial reactions. There has been a ref sitting there watching him like a hawk for any reaction, and when DMC is standing there watching the JumboTron playback, and then reacts in outcry like any player does, the ref staring at him waiting for any reaction, T's him up - that's a travesty of officiating IMO.

* With the recent NBA support for the Kings staying in Sac, and Commissioner Silver attending our game the first week in office, and the slavering over Vivek Ranadive and the entire NBA 3.0 international vision, it is a must that the Kings become a competitive team. India isn't going to get fans following the Kings unless they are a winner. Many people have predicted we may get preferential treatment - it has just waited until now to manifest (didn't want to make it too obvious from the beginning of the season?)

* The last 2 games the Kings have been the recipient of more favorable ref calls than I've seen in the past 7 years combined. <--only mildly hyperbolic

* I noticed something during Demarcus' recent injury-
He seemed calm on the bench as he was watching the game in streetclothes.
He seemed like he was doing his part, staying off the court.
Usually, he'd be internally seething, not getting that playing time and getting his stats to prove his case (that he's one of the best big men in the NBA).
I believe he was told to sit out his ankle injury much longer than he had to. I believe the Kings had to give him a hint that he's the rising star for the team and therefore a face of the international NBA 3.0 vision. I believe the Kings deliberately didn't want to win those 7 games because they have seen how solidly DMC and Gay (and IT lesser-so) are gelling together and they are afraid of winning too many games and losing a good draft spot.

* DMC should have been thrown out both of the last 2 games, if we are being objective and comparing to his history. It's not like he's been on better behavior - he has jawed plenty, he has had run-ins with Mike Dunleavy, and has deliberately initiated contact that previously has gotten him T'd up and thrown out of games. Against Toronto, he needlessly tried to spike Grevious in the backcourt while our PG was walking the ball up. This would normally have been watched intently by the refs and reacted to immediately. But the refs are now letting incidental dumb stuff go with Demarcus. That NEVER used to happen.

* It is HILARIOUS and vindicating to see other players (and teams) blowing a gasket when they are treated like DMC has been. Joakim Noah completely losing it and F-bombing with threatening gestures directly at the refs simply for getting ticky-tack calls shows that DMC isn't alone in not liking getting screwed by refs. I don't see the league and fanbase getting out their pitchforks and suggesting Noah seek psychological counseling after this on-court meltdown, do you? In fact, I don't remember DMC EVER being as bad as Noah was on the court - correct me if I'm forgetting him doing as bad to refs.
Kyle Lowry got himself tossed after a questionable call on the 3-pointer. Hell, it got to Tom Thibadaeu in his postgame conference, and he needed a team meeting the next day to recompose the team. Nice to see other teams have to deal with the absurd frustrations of NBA reffing for a change. It sure impacted the Bulls team, and they are supposedly paragons of NBA solidity.

* We are going to start seeing the rest of the NBA (other team's sportscasters, ESPN, national print media, etc) start writing positive articles about DMC, and spotlighting his good points more. This hackjob he's been getting for years and ridiculous over-focus on being a tough competitor will slowly lessen.
This will be in full bloom by next year at this point in the season, after he's a legitimate (not injury-appointed) All-Star and the Kings have a winning record.


Feel free to ignore or ridicule as you will - I just had to get all that said.
Tin_foil_hat_2.jpg
 
i'm certain we will land a top 3 pick and this was set before a ball was bounced this season. Lets get some W's though regardless
 
UM... I admit that the Kings got screwed in 2002. A lot of people including Ralph Nader were very suspicious of that playoff conference final. Then you have the Donaghy Disaster, where you find out that there WERE refs fixing games and Donaghy's book highlighting the crookedness that suggested the NBA was complicit.

And the Lottery will continue to look rigged until it is done live on ESPN. The ENTIRE Lottery, balls and all. The present setup is a sham. It has the appearance of being legit with people from the NBA and a SELECT FEW media whose careers are dependent on the NBA in attendance behind closed doors. Until that system of suspicion is corrected, there will ALWAYS be those that claim it is rigged. Me included. Bring the whole thing into the light of the day. The argument that no one will watch that many hours of tedious "bingo" like action is ludicrous. They could put that on ESPN 4 and it would STILL get high ratings. Until it is done in the LIGHT, there will always be a Dark Cloud hanging over the proceedings.

BUT ! If you DO think the whole thing is rigged, if you think all sports are rigged, then you are either naive or dumb if you continue to watch the sham. If the NBA is rigged, then it is no better than the Crapload of Reality TV that is about as REAL as the Tooth Fairy. If that is the case, continuing to watching something that is rigged and the outcome can be predicted before the contest even starts would be an utter waste of time for me.

I believe there have been some VERY questionable situations in the last 10-15 years that have made the NBA look less than legit. But one must understand that the League is run by humans. Humans are not perfect. There are bound to be major gaffs that they make worse by trying to cover up to protect their product. I truly believe that they are trying to fix the many problems. The refs are bad and do need to be addressed. The lottery is bad and must be addressed. I am hopeful the new Comish will be willing to take a bold stand and fix some of the problems that Stern was unwilling or unable to address. But I can not say in a blanket statement that the whole thing is rigged....and still watch....
 
UM... I admit that the Kings got screwed in 2002. A lot of people including Ralph Nader were very suspicious of that playoff conference final. Then you have the Donaghy Disaster, where you find out that there WERE refs fixing games and Donaghy's book highlighting the crookedness that suggested the NBA was complicit.

And the Lottery will continue to look rigged until it is done live on ESPN. The ENTIRE Lottery, balls and all. The present setup is a sham. It has the appearance of being legit with people from the NBA and a SELECT FEW media whose careers are dependent on the NBA in attendance behind closed doors. Until that system of suspicion is corrected, there will ALWAYS be those that claim it is rigged. Me included. Bring the whole thing into the light of the day. The argument that no one will watch that many hours of tedious "bingo" like action is ludicrous. They could put that on ESPN 4 and it would STILL get high ratings. Until it is done in the LIGHT, there will always be a Dark Cloud hanging over the proceedings.

BUT ! If you DO think the whole thing is rigged, if you think all sports are rigged, then you are either naive or dumb if you continue to watch the sham. If the NBA is rigged, then it is no better than the Crapload of Reality TV that is about as REAL as the Tooth Fairy. If that is the case, continuing to watching something that is rigged and the outcome can be predicted before the contest even starts would be an utter waste of time for me.

I believe there have been some VERY questionable situations in the last 10-15 years that have made the NBA look less than legit. But one must understand that the League is run by humans. Humans are not perfect. There are bound to be major gaffs that they make worse by trying to cover up to protect their product. I truly believe that they are trying to fix the many problems. The refs are bad and do need to be addressed. The lottery is bad and must be addressed. I am hopeful the new Comish will be willing to take a bold stand and fix some of the problems that Stern was unwilling or unable to address. But I can not say in a blanket statement that the whole thing is rigged....and still watch....

I read an article heaven knows where that said the best NBA refs were right a little over 90% of the time. Whether that is good or bad is another issue. I'd hate to be an NBA ref. We debated a call involving Lowrey and Ben a few days ago for over 24 hrs and the ref had to make the call on the spot. I don't recall there being a consensus about whether the ref was correct or not.
 
Is the OP being serious? Also, to the above post, the 2002 playoffs doesn't mean anything was rigged. It means that the officiating was really bad at times during that series. In no way do I believe that the league told the officials that they wanted the Lakers to win. Hell, if anything I think the NBA would have been perfectly fine with Sac winning. We were the darlings of the NBA and had a huge fan base around the world. People loved watching us play. I just think that some of the crews, especially the Game 6 crew, were just horrible and maybe the Lakers got in their head and they were afraid to make certain calls against them.

Even the Donaghy drama didn't prove that the games were fixed. He himself, and the FBI confirmed this, said that he never actually "fixed" the games. He refereed the games as normal for him. He even threw out Pop in a game where he had money on the Spurs. He just knew he had an edge in his bets primarily because of who was officiating that night and also having other inside information about teams and players. The main piece though was that he knew certain referees would have tendencies to favor one player over another because of their personal like or dislike of that player. I believe he also said that Bavetta was famous for "keeping teams in games" and keeping the score close so if there was a big underdog when Dick refereed, he would bet on them.

While obviously all of this needs to be eliminated from the officiating staff, it's hardly an "NBA conspiracy" that is orchestrated to determine who they want to win and lose. It sounds like it's nothing more than the human element getting to the referees a little bit more than it should. This is the reason why DMC will get a BS technical from time to time. I don't think they really like him and they expect him to do unsporting acts. And why would they like him? He literally complains and scowls at them almost every single time they make a call against him or when they don't call a foul for him.
 
Is the OP being serious? Also, to the above post, the 2002 playoffs doesn't mean anything was rigged. It means that the officiating was really bad at times during that series. In no way do I believe that the league told the officials that they wanted the Lakers to win. Hell, if anything I think the NBA would have been perfectly fine with Sac winning. We were the darlings of the NBA and had a huge fan base around the world. People loved watching us play. I just think that some of the crews, especially the Game 6 crew, were just horrible and maybe the Lakers got in their head and they were afraid to make certain calls against them.

Even the Donaghy drama didn't prove that the games were fixed. He himself, and the FBI confirmed this, said that he never actually "fixed" the games. He refereed the games as normal for him. He even threw out Pop in a game where he had money on the Spurs. He just knew he had an edge in his bets primarily because of who was officiating that night and also having other inside information about teams and players. The main piece though was that he knew certain referees would have tendencies to favor one player over another because of their personal like or dislike of that player. I believe he also said that Bavetta was famous for "keeping teams in games" and keeping the score close so if there was a big underdog when Dick refereed, he would bet on them.

While obviously all of this needs to be eliminated from the officiating staff, it's hardly an "NBA conspiracy" that is orchestrated to determine who they want to win and lose. It sounds like it's nothing more than the human element getting to the referees a little bit more than it should. This is the reason why DMC will get a BS technical from time to time. I don't think they really like him and they expect him to do unsporting acts. And why would they like him? He literally complains and scowls at them almost every single time they make a call against him or when they don't call a foul for him.

So where do all the checks I write to the NBA go if they aren't rigging things? I want my money back!!!
 
Wow! Thank goodness for the First Amendment and our grand poobah administrator to enable this Twilight Zone screenplay. We Kings fans have never been accused of not being emotional about our Kings. Your comment that the Maloof's were the worst owners ever is a bit off the mark. Up until 2007-08 we all thought they were the Best owners ever. Deep pockets, a passion for the Kings, enthusiastic young owners in big favor with Commissioner Stern. Then the bottom fell out of the real estate market in Vegas and they were hit hard to the point of near bankruptacy. Their financial hands became tied. They did draft Tyreke, Cuz and IT. But could do little else. Our passions wained and we all felt hurt. Now that is behind us for ever.

As to the rest of the conspiracy theories, well some merit to some of them. As to the refs, the Kings became the cry babies of the NBA. I refereed college Lacrosse in LA for several years so have some perspective on whiners and cry babies as many lacrosse players were also on their football teams, like USC, UCLA, SDSU and the powerhouse team of that era, Whittier College (seriously!) and more than a few expected special treatment. They didn't get it. The NBA refs of today are excellent at least 90% of the time. No one is perfect and no ref will see 100% of the fouls, subjective as some seem to be. They do an excellent job considering all the egos and personalitits involved.

bajaden and I will have our fun with this thread watching the next game.
 
Last edited:
I read an article heaven knows where that said the best NBA refs were right a little over 90% of the time. Whether that is good or bad is another issue. I'd hate to be an NBA ref. We debated a call involving Lowrey and Ben a few days ago for over 24 hrs and the ref had to make the call on the spot. I don't recall there being a consensus about whether the ref was correct or not.

The fact is there are gonna be bad calls as long as human beings are making the calls. Whether they are just missed calls or if there is purpose behind the errant calls will endlessly be up for debate. Replay is a bandaid on a severed limb. That element will always be up for discussion.

But they CAN fix the Lottery if they wanted to. The best Idea I have heard is that the worst team in both conferences get the 1st and 2nd pick on a coin flip. Then every other team that did not make the playoffs have equal chances at the picks 3-15 drawing names from a hat in front of GAWD and everybody.

Completely fair and addresses the issue of teams tanking because only the 2 very worst teams get a shot at number 1. And the chance of tanking and getting the 15th pick is very real. But the system they have in place now looks like the league is selling higher positions in the draft to the highest bidder, and there is no way to disprove that isn't actually happening short of televising LIVE every monotonous second of the selection process...
 
Last edited:
The fact is there are gonna be bad calls as long as human beings are making the calls. Whether they are just missed calls or if there is purpose behind the errant calls will endlessly be up for debate. Replay is a bandaid on a severed limb. That element will always be up for discussion.

But they CAN fix the Lottery if they wanted to. The best Idea I have heard is that the worst team in both conferences get the 1st and 2nd pick on a coin flip. Then every other team that did not make the playoffs have equal chances at the picks 3-15 drawing names from a hat in front of GAWD and everybody.

Completely fair and addresses the issue of teams tanking because only the 2 very worst teams get a shot at number 1. And the chance of tanking and getting the 15th pick is very real. But the system they have in place now looks like the league is selling higher positions in the draft to the highest bidder, and there is no way to disprove that isn't actually happening short of televising LIVE every monotonous second of the selection process...

Would it take that long to watch the ping pong balls? I think it would add to the tension/excitement.
 
Would it take that long to watch the ping pong balls? I think it would add to the tension/excitement.

They have purposely over complicated the process. From Wikipedia :

"In the new system, 14 numbered table tennis balls were used. Then, a four-digit combination from the 14 balls were drawn to determine the lottery winner. Prior to the draft, the NBA assigned 1000 possible combinations to the non-playoff teams. The process was then repeated to determine the second and third pick."

The assigning of combinations is suspicious.... The drawing process takes a long time because the four balls are drawn to get one combination per draw. If that team has already been drawn, they have to redraw. Thankfully it is only for the first 3 picks. Still they COULD televise it live and people would watch (I would watch.... wonder what that says about my sick sports obsession :)

All the other picks are by reverse record. Top 3 is usually not always a fantastic player. If your GM stinks, it wont matter where you are picking. Look at the Raiders...
 
Whereas my name has been mentioned, I feel obligated to respond. I'm not a big believer in conspiracy's. I do enjoy reading about them though. I think escape from reality is a good thing now and then. However, while I don't endorse conspiracy's, I do believe in bias. So, I do think the Ref's, whether they would admit it or not, are affected by Cousins reputation, and their own personal interactions with him. He has to some degree, become the whipping boy of the NBA, or at least one of them. Referee's are human beings with emotions just like us. And while they do make mistakes, they get it right the majority of the time. And like most of us, they don't like having their professional opinions questioned. I've watched enough NBA games over the years to know that no NBA player ever thinks he fouled anyone. Its the degree to which he tries to impress the ref that he's wrong that gets him in trouble. Cousins, who would make a lousy poker player, is extremely good at making his feelings known.

So, while I don't think there's a secret room where all the high up's meet to discuss whether Cousins should be the subject of the ref's ire, I do think that a good word from our new owners might carry some weight toward the referee's being a little more open minded in regards to Cousins. Truth is, any sport that relies on subjective decisions, is subject to question. Does anyone think that the best figure skater always wins. No two people ever see the same thing the same way. Lineup five people that witnessed the same event, and you'll get five different versions of what happened. As far as the lottery goes, all I can say, is that in this instance, I sincerely hope I'm wrong and that your right. No way to prove it one way or the other is there? Even if you're right. Gotta be a coincidence, right?
 
World English Dictionary
coincidence (kəʊˈɪnsɪdəns)
n
a chance occurrence of events remarkable either for being simultaneous or for apparently being connected

I do not see the words REOCCURRING or ONGOING :-)
 
Last game was a statement on IT's birthday that the big 2 want him gone.
Now THAT's a cool observation/jump to a conclusion.

I wouldn't necessarily conclude that; instead I would conclude that it is blatant now the Kings are tanking, since both Rudy and DMC are fully following the dictates of the organization, to lose in games they quite easily could be winning if just our Big 3 play the way they've proven they can play.
 
Last game was a statement on IT's birthday that the big 2 want him gone.

Huh? Must have missed that statement. Who said what? Cuz was pouting quite a bit on perceived missed calls and non-calls. Gay was weak from 4 days of the flu. MT played in first half and that was that.
 
Huh? Must have missed that statement. Who said what? Cuz was pouting quite a bit on perceived missed calls and non-calls. Gay was weak from 4 days of the flu. MT played in first half and that was that.

Cuz and Gay sang Happy Birthday to IT and then said "get the hell out of here."

Not really. ;)
 
Now THAT's a cool observation/jump to a conclusion.

I wouldn't necessarily conclude that; instead I would conclude that it is blatant now the Kings are tanking, since both Rudy and DMC are fully following the dictates of the organization, to lose in games they quite easily could be winning if just our Big 3 play the way they've proven they can play.


So they say that TANKING does not exist in the NBA? Well, IMHO if the Kings lose tonight against a moribund Cavs squad that is going thru the motions, then it is a sign that they have lost interest in this road trip if not all of games leading up to the all star break. While Coach Malone was preaching that the lead up to the AS Game was a good time to steal a few wins, the Players went into cruise control and started booking flights to wherever they are planing to go on their mini vacation. Sad but true I think. But they could prove me wrong and beat the Cavs like they should...

If after the break they are still playing with no energy at home against Golden State, then I would presume that they are not giving maximum effort and the TANKING concept may actually be a reality...

p.s. that dude from Ancient Aliens... his hair has its own facebook page !

https://www.facebook.com/GiorgioA.TsoukalosHair

My wife think HE is an alien. Hair is hiding his antenna... or his bald spot...
 
Back
Top