ockingsfan
Starter
They also drafted the L-Train that year.
I guess 1 out of 4 is not as bad.

They also drafted the L-Train that year.
I guess 1 out of 4 is not as bad.![]()
Fair point...but who do you think has more potential to be better, Chriss or Papa?You and anyone else really have no idea if Chriss is better than anyone drafted after him. He's so raw there is no telling. I personally have some doubts about him and how effective he will be but like I said earlier, can't tell. Until they tart playing regular games
Again, fair point...which is also why I refuse to watch or talk about Bogdan. No proof he will ever be here or if he is even good until he plays against NBA players. I like Richardson's potential, but outside of him Chriss was worth the risk as he has the most potential, which was my point.I don't see any proof that Chriss is better than anyone on that list, until then I don't even want to discuss him.
Again, fair point...which is also why I refuse to watch or talk about Bogdan. No proof he will ever be here or if he is even good until he plays against NBA players. I like Richardson's potential, but outside of him Chriss was worth the risk as he has the most potential, which was my point.
Again, fair point...which is also why I refuse to watch or talk about Bogdan. No proof he will ever be here or if he is even good until he plays against NBA players. I like Richardson's potential, but outside of him Chriss was worth the risk as he has the most potential, which was my point.
One guy is athletic and long, one guy is ginormous. Like I said before, probably should see these guys play against NBA players and evaluate knowing that both are teenagers. I never bought into the Chriss hype. In this case, these guys need an honest 2-3 years before knowing what you gotFair point...but who do you think has more potential to be better, Chriss or Papa?
Fair point...but who do you think has more potential to be better, Chriss or Papa?
One guy is athletic and long, one guy is ginormous. Like I said before, probably should see these guys play against NBA players and evaluate knowing that both are teenagers. I never bought into the Chriss hype. In this case, these guys need an honest 2-3 years before knowing what you got
With evaluators saying that Bogdanovich would be a top 5 or top 3 pick in this or next years draft, and us getting 2 other young bigs, this trade most likely is going to be a big win for Sac. Personally, I think Chriss and Skal are going to be the same level of player.It isn't quite that simple of a question. In the trade for Chriss the Kings acquired Papa, Skal, and Bogdanovic. I make sure to point that out because I'm with you if Chriss was traded straight up for Papa but he was not.
With that in mind the question needs to be restated like this: who has the potential to be better Chriss or the combination of Papa, Skal, and Bogdanovich?
That is why in my earlier post I stated that unless Chriss becomes a perennial All-Star and none of the Kings players become eventual starters, that it was a good trade.
With evaluators saying that Bogdanovich would be a top 5 or top 3 pick in this or next years draft, and us getting 2 other young bigs, this trade most likely is going to be a big win for Sac. Personally, I think Chriss and Skal are going to be the same level of player.
If that is the case I hope he comes over...time will tell.With evaluators saying that Bogdanovich would be a top 5 or top 3 pick in this or next years draft, and us getting 2 other young bigs, this trade most likely is going to be a big win for Sac. Personally, I think Chriss and Skal are going to be the same level of player.
Considering you're pretty much the only person convinced he's not coming over, we'll probably see in 2017.If that is the case I hope he comes over...time will tell.
It isn't quite that simple of a question. In the trade for Chriss the Kings acquired Papa, Skal, and Bogdanovic. I make sure to point that out because I'm with you if Chriss was traded straight up for Papa but he was not.
With that in mind the question needs to be restated like this: who has the potential to be better Chriss or the combination of Papa, Skal, and Bogdanovich?
That is why in my earlier post I stated that unless Chriss becomes a perennial All-Star and none of the Kings players become eventual starters, that it was a good trade.
I am not convinced he isn't coming, I have just never seen anything seeing he is coming, until then....Considering you're pretty much the only person convinced he's not coming over, we'll probably see in 2017.
With evaluators saying that Bogdanovich would be a top 5 or top 3 pick in this or next years draft, and us getting 2 other young bigs, this trade most likely is going to be a big win for Sac. Personally, I think Chriss and Skal are going to be the same level of player.
Do you have the link to the post saying Bogdanovich would be a top 5 or 3 pick in next years draft? The top of the draft is loaded next year. I think Bogdanovich has a shot at being a nice player but dont think he will be a franchise changer. I don't remember anything hyping him up that much
Link---> http://www.sactownroyalty.com/2016/7/13/12167712/kings-bogdan-bogdanovic
Excerpt: "
I have heard some people say that if Bogdan was in the draft this year he would have been a lottery pick. Essentially, he was because the Kings traded for his rights at 8, but what are your thoughts on that? Do you think he would have gone in the top 8 if he was in this year's NBA Draft?
Top 5 pick this summer if he were in the draft."
Thanks! So Top 5 pick in this past draft nothing about the 2017 draft. I wonder what kind of money he will be looking for next year.