KainLear
Starter
While I do agree with most of what you said, the major difference for me is that I don't look at the refs (NBA) as having a secret agenda, I'm more concerned about their actual incompetence of refereeing the high-paced game with intricate switching and ball movement, and the lack of concern from the national media about it (because NBA doesn't allow anybody to speak of it). We should be investing serious time and effort in finding out the best way to have coaches' challenge without extending review time (which is strange that the on-court refs still got the final say even though we have a fully functional Replay Center in Secaucus, NJ). The lack of consistency in carry, double-dribble, out-of-bound, blocking/charging, and many other subjective rules that NBA never felt like cleaning up.My point is there are always going to be plays but I haven't seen anything where you start wondering if there is an agenda behind it all. It's really just been pretty much a non topic IMO. There were a couple of plays the Kings got away with fouls too.
I can go on, but to put too much investment into a sport where it is an open secret that its refs enforce "Superstar calls" is simply ridiculous in my opinion.