Ailene Voisin: Trade puts focus back on Stojakovic

LMM

Starter
http://www.sacbee.com/content/sports/basketball/kings/story/12451945p-13308084c.html

Ailene Voisin: Trade puts focus back on Stojakovic



By Ailene Voisin -- Bee Sports Columnist
Published 2:15 am PST Friday, February 25, 2005


He heard the speculation and suspected something was imminent. He prepped himself for a trade. His trade.



Now that he remains a King?



Now comes the pressure.

Now comes time for the proof.

Peja Stojakovic resumes a familiar role - that of primary scorer - while confronting an entirely new reality. Circumstances have changed. Expectations have risen. With Chris Webber sent to the Philadelphia 76ers in a daring six-player swap Wednesday, the Kings again figure to become an entertaining ensemble, with heightened responsibility bestowed upon Mike Bibby, Brad Miller and, in particular, Stojakovic.

Peja has to regain his health. And his swagger. And his playful nature. He has to be the Peja of 2003-04, the enthusiastic small forward who, a year ago at this time, was the league's second-leading scorer and a legitimate MVP candidate. He was that prolific, that consistent. How soon we forget.

Utilizing his full 6-foot-10 frame, deceptive quickness, unique scoring abilities and passion for moving without the ball, he eased into the role of legitimate star, was on the cusp of joining the NBA elite.

His three-pointers kissed the nets. His backdoor cuts off passes from Miller and Vlade Divac were textbook. His energy was infectious. His joyous attitude was contagious. His rebounding and defense were more than adequate. Most importantly, the seventh-year pro was involved and engaged, eager for the ball and opportunities for the deciding shots.

Yet he changed when the Kings changed, his declining production coinciding with Webber's return last March following a 58-game absence. With Webber supplanting Divac and Miller at the high post, once again the dominant decision-maker who determined when to pass, when to shoot, whom to feature, Stojakovic was virtually ignored, his skills essentially wasted.

Compounded by injuries and the same old routine, Peja's troubles persisted for much of the current season. Webber remained the ruler, Peja the conquered, compliant to the end. No news flash there. The former teammates enjoy each other as people; they just couldn't get it together on the court.

"Peja is a player who receives the ball," one NBA head coach said recently after a game at Arco Arena, "which means he has to rely on teammates to find him. That's one reason I wasn't sold on the (Doug) Christie trade. Christie always made sure Peja received the ball where he was most effective. You can't score if teammates don't give you the ball."

But now?

No more explanations. No more excuses. No more excluding Peja, or Peja allowing himself to be excluded. He is 27, no longer the wide-eyed youngster from Serbia who idolized Webber from afar.

Considerable intrigue about these Kings remains, of course: How will Bibby react to the departure of his close friend? How will Corliss Williamson feel about returning as a reserve? What will newcomers Kenny Thomas and Brian Skinner contribute?

Yet in another sense, this Kings puzzle is ridiculously simple. For the Kings to evolve into an effective collaborative effort, a team that competes aggressively in the closing weeks of the season, Bibby has to become a more assertive floor leader who utilizes his full complement of playmaking skills. Miller has to temper his outbursts and resume his role as a skillful high post center with the improving low-post game. The ball has to move. The players have to rebound and defend en masse. And now that he's still here, no longer forced to fight for his shots, no longer interested in leaving, Peja has to be Peja.

"He thinks he is having a bad year, but he's not," Kings president of basketball operations Geoff Petrie said. "I think he's got to get past that."

Contrary to the rumors, Petrie said he had no intention of trading his small forward. Members of the front office and coaching staff instead firmly believe that Webber's departure will enable the three-time All-Star to flourish, to move forward.

The entire dynamic has shifted.

The Webber era - in a shocker - is over.

"You never know in this business," Stojakovic said from Dallas, "but I thought it was going to be me. Now we have to see how this group of guys is going to play. Obviously ... I have been playing with Chris for seven years. He was great for the Kings. But that's our life." Now his life changes too, his reputation to be enhanced or diminished. He doesn't have to be an MVP. He doesn't possess those types of skills. But he has to be the old Peja, the fearless scorer, the peerless shooter. He has to be special. He has to be that.
 
well voisin got wat she wanted....it wont be long before she realizes that sometimes getting what you want is an invitation for disaster
 
Does Peja not possess the skills to be an MVP, or does he not possess the drive/heart? An interesting question to consider, imho. He's certainly got the skills to score...you can't just drop in 24.2 per game and be a scrub. He can defend, and he *could* rebound with his size and athleticism at his position.

But at what point has he been a fearless scorer? And will he no longer have to fight for his shots if he can't create his own? Is Bibby just going to hand over the offensive #1 option to Peja at this point? Will Mobley automatically not shoot or look for his shot when Peja returns?

All just cynical questions for thought. In truth, I am one of the believers in the fact that the Kings' offense can probably return to a more free flowing style without CWebb, if for no other reason that the big guys who will now handle the ball at the high post aren't #1 offensive options (never have been, probably never will be). That's not a knock on Miller and whichever player starts at PF. Just a fact. And it changes the dynamic of how the ball will move. It won't be as easy for Bibby to get free off the initial screen (fake screen) set by the PF/C going forward, so that in and of itself would mandate more movement of the ball in search of a better shot.

But whether this automatically restores Peja to the Peja of 2003-04 remains to be seen. For the team's sake that is what I'm pulling for, but it's not as if only CWebb is gone. Vlade and DC are gone as well. This team can still pass well, but all of the three departed were at the very least better than average passers at their position. Their successors? Not to the same level at this point.
 
Will Voison be pissed if her boy doesn't succeed the way she wants to? Will she bash him too? I don't know what she wrote in the past, but will she flip sides if things go "bad" or not perfect. I hate people like that.
 
bigbadred00 said:
Will Voison be pissed if her boy doesn't succeed the way she wants to? Will she bash him too? I don't know what she wrote in the past, but will she flip sides if things go "bad" or not perfect. I hate people like that.

If you ask me it would be even worst if she decides to cover for Peja if he does not perform at the level she has predicted him to play at. From the beginning she has been an incredible Webber hater blaming every problem the team has on him. I think she will see soon that Webber meant more to this team than she thought...especially come playoff time.
 
Oh, for God's sake... two votes does not make you a "legitimate" MVP candidate. Stojakovic was no more of a legitimate MVP candidate last year than Nowitzki was... which is to say, not at all. And without his boy to make him look good, he's not going to be one this year, either.
 
Dude Seim, until the late season run, Peja was one of the front runners. Give me a break. Peja was better for the first 60 games then Dirk by a MILE. All around he was just better and leading a better team and this is from a Webber "homer." Peja if we had the best record in the league could have easily been the MVP or 2nd or 3rd, easily.
 
What I don't get is why Peja's game dissapeared like that when Webb came back, and why people blame CHRIS for Peja's game dissapearing. You play or you don't play, you bring it no matter what. You step up or you step down, and if you decide to step down then it's on you, not on the person you're stepping down for. I see no reason why Peja could not have played more of his "MVP" style game when Chris was on the court.
 
The only thing I can say Geoff, is if you have a bunch of Stars like the Kings do your going to all have to share. There is no #1 every night, 1 night it's Peja, 1 it's Brad, 1 it's Webb, you know what I'm saying. Your right Peja wasn't as consistant but noone was but the team still was winning, we won a playoff series and even got to game 7. I don't know if we would have won it all let's say if Webber didn't come back or came off the bench and Bobby was still healthy, but we still did alot considering the circumstances. Peja should step up, so should everyone else, but that's not Peja's style I guess. But 5 stars on court, noone is going to be the man every night, and that's what happened. Will see if 4 on the court will work this time........5 was working for while, then everyone got hurt.......... :(.
 
But your right, Peja seemed to have the biggest problem, but Brad also is a better player without Webber or so it seemed versus the Knicks and GSW, but then who was guarding him. Brad was slightly better last year too but not significantly. Honestly I still believe offence wasn't the problem with this team it was the D. The D is what was the problem, we havent' had any this whole month. Will these replacements play good D, if they do then we will be alright.
 
Peja is part of what got me into basketball...............but he is in no way MVP (even last year). Sure he can score a lot but there is more to it then that.
 
bigbadred00 said:
Dude Seim, until the late season run, Peja was one of the front runners. Give me a break. Peja was better for the first 60 games then Dirk by a MILE.
By "a mile?" 24 and 6 is better than 22 and 9 by "a mile?" Spare me.

Who would you guess had more game-winning shots last year: Stojakovic or Nowitzki.
 
You obviously don't understand the MVP SEIM, at all. It's the best player on the best team, Kings when Webber came back were the best team in the league. Dallas with Dirk wasn't even close. Best player in the league might still be KG, but he isn't winning the MVP by any means this year.
 
Mr. S£im Citrus said:
Oh, for God's sake... two votes does not make you a "legitimate" MVP candidate. Stojakovic was no more of a legitimate MVP candidate last year than Nowitzki was... which is to say, not at all. And without his boy to make him look good, he's not going to be one this year, either.

still bitter
 
Seim, we were 48-16 at 1 point last year and Dallas was 40-24 after the same number of games. Peja was an MVP candidate because of this and Dirk was nothing at the time. Give me a break. Did you watch the team. I love Webber like my brother and I like Peja, but even I know he was a leading candidate.
 
Seim, lets say the best player on the best team had a line like this 15-5-5, but his team's record was let's say 75-7, and the next closest team had a record of 60-22, then the best player on the 75-7 team wins the MVP. That's how it goes in the MVP. This isn't MLB where A-Rod can win the MVP on a non-playoff team, this is the NBA where the best player is usually on a contender or the best team in the conference.
 
bigbadred00 said:
You obviously don't understand the MVP SEIM, at all. It's the best player on the best team, Kings when Webber came back were the best team in the league.
The Kings may have had the best record after sixty games; they weren't even remotely the best team.

And my name isn't "SEIM." It's "S£im." That's the Pound Sterling, used due to the "crossed L" effect, not an E.


piksi said:
still bitter
About what?
 
Nash scores 16 ppg and gets 11 apg, yet he's the leading MVP candidate yet he plays no D and is never considered one of the best players in the league yet he could and will probally win the MVP if his team continues to play well especially play well with him and horrible without him.
 
Dude, we weren't the best team? I'm pretty sure if I goto the power rankings we were the #1 team at the time considering Malone's injury. I guess you could put Minne or San Antonio ahead of us, but we did have a better record than them. How else are teams rated, Ws. Wins are all that matter buddy.
 
bigbadred00 said:
Seim, lets say the best player on the best team had a line like this 15-5-5, but his team's record was let's say 75-7, and the next closest team had a record of 60-22, then the best player on the 75-7 team wins the MVP. That's how it goes in the MVP.
Oh really? When has that ever happened? When has a player who put up mediocre stats on a good team ever won the MVP?
 
bigbadred00 said:
Nash scores 16 ppg and gets 11 apg, yet he's the leading MVP candidate yet he plays no D and is never considered one of the best players in the league yet he could and will probally win the MVP if his team continues to play well especially play well with him and horrible without him.
16 pts and 11 ast is not mediocre. In fact, considering that no one has averaged 11 assists in nearly ten years, that's fairly incredible. And you're hurting your argument if you're trying to use Nash as an example; Nash makes everyone on the Suns better. Stojakovic does not make his teammates better.

bigbadred00 said:
Dude, we weren't the best team?
No, we weren't. San Antonio was always better, and Minnesota probably was, too. And wins are not *ALL* that matter; Going strictly by win-loss, Phoenix is the second-best team in the league. They aren't, and the playoffs will prove it. Going strictly by win-loss, Sacramento is the sixth-best team in the league, and that isn't true, either.
 
Mr. S£im Citrus said:
16 pts and 11 ast is not mediocre. In fact, considering that no one has averaged 11 assists in nearly ten years, that's fairly incredible. And you're hurting your argument if you're trying to use Nash as an example; Nash makes everyone on the Suns better. Stojakovic does not make his teammates better.

No, we weren't. San Antonio was always better, and Minnesota probably was, too. And wins are not *ALL* that matter; Going strictly by win-loss, Phoenix is the second-best team in the league. They aren't, and the playoffs will prove it. Going strictly by win-loss, Sacramento is the sixth-best team in the league, and that isn't true, either.

I agree, we definitely weren't the best team. We also had had the luxury of an easy schedule and a lot of home games. AND, although our record was great, we weren't playing as well as it would suggest. I remember Doug Christie saying after they had lost a couple that the team hadn't really been playing that well right before Webber came back, but that as long as you get a W, people ignore the problems that are there. Pulling out close games against not so great opponents masks problems that were there all along, like no defense and no rebounding.
 
bigbadred00 said:
Seim, we were 48-16 at 1 point last year and Dallas was 40-24 after the same number of games. Peja was an MVP candidate because of this and Dirk was nothing at the time. Give me a break. Did you watch the team. I love Webber like my brother and I like Peja, but even I know he was a leading candidate.

Perhaps, but he should not have been.

No MVP that I can recall has ever been a one dimensional player. MVPs are GREAT players -- dominant in multiple facets of the game. Some, like KG, are ltierally dominant in EVERY facet of the game. Peja's pretty much just a scorer. Throws in respectable defense now, but certainly nothing to win an award over. And MVPs are almsot always the unquestioned leaders of their team -- the guys everyone else looks to fro leadership, and guys who make their temmates better. If Peja had been MVP he'd have been by FAR the weakest MVP...well, since way back before my basketball watching days started. Last year was just a very very bad year for almost all of the league's superstars. Freakish year in a lot of ways.

Not really importnat in most ways, EXCEPT that we don't seriously start to delude ourselves that Peja is an MVP level player ala a Shaq, Duncan, Garnett, MJ, Hakeem etc. etc.
 
acisking said:
well voisin got wat she wanted....it wont be long before she realizes that sometimes getting what you want is an invitation for disaster

Remember the Kings have won more games when Webber was not playing...And to be honest I haven't been a big fan of C-webb( the selfish side), but the Kings as a whole is what I really enjoy watching. Everyone has their speculations and opinions. I think C-webb is a very good player, and after his injury i think he came back to soon, kinda threw off the Kings timing and they spiraled down just a little.
 
bigbadred00 said:
Peja should step up, so should everyone else, but that's not Peja's style I guess.

EXACTLY.

And he got a free pass for it too! Not only did he get a free pass, but Chris got blamed for Peja's style of not stepping up!

I am not blaming Peja or saying it is his fault, I will take his word and Chris's word that they are cool with each other. What I am angry about is this double standard that was present with far too many people over the past few years where Webber became the scapegoat.
 
Gregorius said:
Peja steps up when Chris is out, but he also steps down when he's healthy.

Everybody steps up when people are out -- we saw it again last night with Cat and Bibby, with Bibby and Miller last month etc. The question is does he step up WHEN HE'S NEEDED. When the going gets tough, when the pressure is on, does he step up? You would have a real time making a case for that. Might even be able to make a pretty good case he goes the other way, although I continue to hold out hope on that front.
 
All this stuff about Peja being an MVP candidate ignores the omniscient Voisin:

He doesn't have to be an MVP. He doesn't possess those types of skills. But he has to be the old Peja, the fearless scorer, the peerless shooter. He has to be special. He has to be that.

If even Voisin, who has been supportive of Peja to point of nausea, doesn't think he's MVP-caliber, I don't see how this question can even continue to surface.

Oh, and sorry for the delay in response. I just got home after a LONG day and couldn't think of any better way to relax than to come here and discuss my favorite team with 27,000 other fans.

:D
 
I feel sorry for Poison, now that her favorite whipping boy is gone who is she gonna bash now?

P.S. bigbadred, its Slim, not Seim. ;)
 
Back
Top