Ailene Voisin: Time to blow it up and hire Jackson

AleksandarN

Starter
What sources are those?


http://www.sacbee.com/content/sports/basketball/kings/story/12834541p-13684519c.html

SEATTLE - There is only one place left to look now, one obvious move to make, and that would be to locate Phil Jackson and convince him to coach the Kings.


Yes, Phil Jackson would be interested. OAS_AD('Button20');


Yes, Phil Jackson would listen.


Could he be enticed? Who knows?

Unfathomable as this sounds, as abrupt as this appears, time is of the essence. The league isn't exactly overpopulated with unemployed superstar coaches. Someone within the Kings' organization should immediately - immediately - make an overture and ask the hard questions, because, well, because the guy has coached his clubs to nine NBA championships, and because the 2005 free-agent coaching market goes bust the minute one of his many suitors drops to bended knee, kisses the ring and makes an offer that causes him to retire the hiking boots and the scuba gear.

According to sources close to the situation, several of whom Tuesday confirmed Jackson's intrigue if the Kings' job were to become vacant, the longtime Lakers coach expects to reach a decision about his future within the next few days.

Yet as of late Tuesday night, while the Kings were engaged in an inspired, if season-ending, defensively challenged encounter with the Seattle SuperSonics, he continued to ruminate (no, we Sacramentans are not as unsophisticated as once accused).

All of which suggests that this little dance of his is about to proceed in one of three directions: 1) the Lakers, who have been pressing for a decision, will interpret his resistance as reluctance to repeat the been-there, done-that scenario and seriously look elsewhere; 2) the coach who dominated the 1990s and already would have eclipsed Red Auerbach had a certain high-profile couple (Shaq and Kobe) not split because of irreconcilable differences avails himself of all other opportunities; or 3) another extended vacation is placed on the 2005-06

calendar.

As it pertains to the Kings, to Geoff Petrie and Joe and Gavin Maloof, this is the time to jump through hoops again. To get goofy on us again. To make the hard decisions.

Thank Rick Adelman for seven franchise-transforming, mostly wonderful seasons, present him his check for the final year of service (2005-06) and then seriously pursue the coach who has caused this Kings franchise more pain than you-know-who's left knee. The community and celebrity coach already share a well-chronicled past: Jackson, 59, not only orchestrated that seventh-game Lakers victory in 2002, he reveled in Sacramento's misery. Publicly he sparred with the

Maloofs, chided Vlade Divac for his flops and ripped Chris Webber in his latest book.

But history is made to be rewritten, and privately, he has always held tremendous respect for Petrie, attends the mega-parties thrown by the Maloofs, and enjoyed the political, vibrant essence of Sacramento. Should he be successfully romanced, he could plot his post-

basketball future with the likes of Arnold and Maria. He could join the protesters outside the Capitol without leaving home. Additionally - and just a hunch here - but momentum for that new arena would receive a massive boost.

No, while not exactly a Las Vegas guy, approaching Jackson is hardly a major gamble, and several within the ownership group are strongly endorsing such a maneuver. Seriously, what have the Maloofs to lose besides a few millions? OK, more than a few millions? But who said winning comes cheap? Just open the checkbook, say, for $5 million of that small-market money, and placate Phil with a slice of the ever-

expanding, always-popular Palms casino.

"We'll do the same thing we do after every season," Joe Maloof said late Tuesday night. "We get together as a family, and, with Geoff, we analyze what we need to do, and how to go about doing it. That's the way we've always done it, and it works out for us."

Reaching out to Jackson at this point, however, makes sense for several other significant reasons: The Kings have better talent and certainly a preferable salary-cap situation than most of the competition, thought to be primarily the Lakers and New York Knicks, followed by the Portland Trail Blazers and Minnesota Timberwolves.

And Petrie has long been regarded as a personnel wizard; surely he has something in the works. The trades of Webber and Doug Christie provided flexibility, depth, and the potential to be better - not worse - defensively. Surely Jackson could squeeze more out of 7-foot-2 Greg Ostertag, the slumping if undersized Brian Skinner and shift the collective emphasis from offense to defense.

The market closes soon. Better act fast.
 
Last edited:
Oh vomit.

On this aritcle preferably.


At least Ailene's reaction to our loss was predictable.
 
She's always the first to jump on Adelman. It's been this way for years, he must have given her a dead mouse in a shoebox or something. Probably had that column written long ago. Sources ?...
 
Don't mind Voisin, she's a little bitter since the Webb trade because she lost one of her favorite punching bags. Now she's left with just Adelman to abuse, and frankly, she's just a little cranky.

Honestly, this is going to be like the Webb trade. Voisin is going to say over and over again in articles for years that Adelman will leave, and then we he finally does, everyone will say she's right.... if you say something long enough, it just might come true.
 
Agree with the premise of offering Jackson the job, or agree that he would actually consider coaching this team? Doesn't seem like his MO to me.
 
I'm also one of the small minority that would like to see Phil coaching the Kings. Adelman's a great coach, but I think he only has 85% of what it takes to win it all.
 
Kingsgurl said:
Agree with the premise of offering Jackson the job, or agree that he would actually consider coaching this team? Doesn't seem like his MO to me.

Agree that Adleman should be fired and Jackson hired.
 
Well, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that all the regular Adelman-Haters on this board are gonna totally agree with this article...duh :rolleyes:
After all the crap Jackson talked about Sac during our "rivalry" years there is no way he would be accepted or loved by Sac fans the way Rick has been....But I guess this is just normal post playoff elimination fodder..."let's see who we can get rid of now!"...Well only time will tell what's gonna happen in the off-season and all we can do is wait and see....I, for one, don't see Coach as being what has held us back from a Finals appearance all these years, there is plenty of blame to go around on that one and hiring a new coach is simply not gonna get the job done IMO. Anyway, regardless of any of that we won't be seeing a coaching change, not this coming season anyway, according to a Sacbee quote from Petrie....
First, because I know you're wondering, the Kings don't plan a change at head coach. Rick Adelman's deal already was extended for the coming season, and while that and 25 cents won't even get you a newspaper anymore, team executive Geoff Petrie said Tuesday evening that he expects no alterations to the coaching staff.
 
Last edited:
I agree with her, at least for once. Since when do Kings fans need to be Adelman fans? The soup is getting mighty stale and it might be time to pitch it in the trash I say.
 
Phil Jackson will never be the coach of the Sacramento Kings. The Maloofs are too smart and sensitive to public opinion for that. I could not watch a Kings game if Jackson were the coach. You might as well bring back Olden Polynice and Keon Clark.
 
Kingsgurl said:
You really think he's TAKE this job?

No idea if he would but my ticket prices keep going up and the product is getting worse. I can't stand another year of Adelman.
 
quick dog said:
Phil Jackson will never be the coach of the Sacramento Kings. The Maloofs are too smart and sensitive to public opinion for that. I could not watch a Kings game if Jackson were the coach. You might as well bring back Olden Polynice and Keon Clark.

While I agree that Phil would never coach the Kings...to say you "would not watch a Kings game if Jackson were coach" doesn't really ring true to me. After the Webber trade I got on here just to read, and this is what I saw..."I will never watch another Kings game", I will never give the Maloofs another dollar of my money", I won't spend anymore money on Kings merchandise", "this is the worst trade EVER in the NBA"....winning cures a lot, and Phil is a winner whether you like him or not. I never liked Phil or Shaq long before they went to the Lakers, but I certainly supported them while they were there.
 
quick dog said:
Phil Jackson will never be the coach of the Sacramento Kings. The Maloofs are too smart and sensitive to public opinion for that. I could not watch a Kings game if Jackson were the coach. You might as well bring back Olden Polynice and Keon Clark.

Not smart enough to get caught having din-din with Jackson though. Kinda tells me they dont give a damn about what people here think, so long as they have a winning situation on the court. :\
 
hoopsfan said:
While I agree that Phil would never coach the Kings...to say you "would not watch a Kings game if Jackson were coach" doesn't really ring true to me. After the Webber trade I got on here just to read, and this is what I saw..."I will never watch another Kings game", I will never give the Maloofs another dollar of my money", I won't spend anymore money on Kings merchandise", "this is the worst trade EVER in the NBA"....winning cures a lot, and Phil is a winner whether you like him or not. I never liked Phil or Shaq long before they went to the Lakers, but I certainly supported them while they were there.

I agree with you. I could bet you there are Laker fans who all of a sudden hate Shaq. Even though he single handedly gave your team the title and was the powerhouse to beat. Go figure. People just feel things they don't even understand. I get over that feeling and look at what Jackson could bring, regardless of calling our town "redneckville". If he does come to "redneckville", then wouldn't he be a part of it? I don't think he really meant it or probably doesnt even remember saying that if he did come here. Anyhow, its a long shot to bring PJ here, but worth trying.
 
Well, PFFFT and hoopsfan, that just tells you one thing which makes perfect sense from a sociological standpoint. An average person is not very smart, and an average sports fan (who is usually pretty close to an average person), is not much smarter...
No difference with the Kings fans ...
 
In response to one guy Keon Clark was a damn good player. Secondly I am not one of the normal Adelman bashers, but I did post in another thread that he coached the 4th quarter horribly by leaving Miller in the game.

Adelman is a good coach. Not many coaches would have been able to pull out a 50 win season with what he had to deal with this season. Blockbuster trades, and blockbuster injuries, but, there's always a but. He does not have the Killer instinct. If it's true that Phil Jackson would be interested in an available Sacramento Job, then I say go for him. People used to hate Kobe Bryant, Shaquille O' Neal and now Ray Allen for some people. I willing to bet though that most people wouldn't have minded if most of those people were on our team this year, except for he fact that Kobe is a selfish me me me player. The same would happen if Phil Jackson was the coach here. Initially there would be some people that would have the knee jerk reaction, HOW COULD YOU BRING HIM HERE, because of all the Laker past. Some would run through the streets laughin hysterically that we have a coach with killer instinct now. But, assuming we made some good personnel changes and he had a good team to work with, as soon as he showed some good strategies etc. everyone would say, "Hey he's not so bad. I don't really mind having him here.". It's how most fans are. You hate a guy, because he's good , and he hurts your favorite team. As soon as he plays for your team, he's the greatest thing.
 
DocHolliday said:
As soon as he plays for your team, he's the greatest thing.
Yep!
Look at how Lakers fan treated Vlade ... and they used to chant his name in derogatory way when he played for the Kings...
 
Adelman is never going to leave for the simple reason that I will summarize with three words:

OLD BOYS CLUB.

nuff sed.
 
sloter said:
Yep!
Look at how Lakers fan treated Vlade ... and they used to chant his name in derogatory way when he played for the Kings...

Not this Laker fan...I didn't like him in '89 and still don't.
 
If Rick Pitino, an ex Kentucky coach can be the coach at Louisville then Phil can coach in Sacramento. As to the fans loving Phil as much as they love Rick...well, the only thing to say to this is that if Phil can help the Kings win a title then he will be the most beloved coach in Sacramento history. As to someone's post about if Phil coaches the Kings we might as well bring OP and Keon back. Come on!!! The guy has won 9 titles regardless of what you think of him as a person or a coach and bringing in Phil is nothing like bringing back OP and Keon. Now, bringing back Bill Russell would be akin to bringing back OP and Keon. I personally don't think that Phil will be the Kings' coach next year, but you can't tell me that it hasn't crossed the minds of Petrie and the Maloofs. Also, the old boys club argument as to Adelman staying with the Kings doesn't fly. Kevin McHale and Flip Saunders had a longer history together than Petrie and Adelman and if Flip can be fired than so too can Rick. The bottom line is that anything can happen. Remember, if Wayne Gretzky can be traded during his prime from Edmonton to LA then nothing is out of the question, even Phil coaching the Kings.
 
Phil doesn't coach OK teams. He coaches teams with at least one superstar on them. Taking this cut-and-paste Kings team on would be a first for him, I don't see it happening. Sure, offer him the job, what could it hurt? I highly doubt he'll take it despite what Ailene's unnamed mystery sources seem to think.

Adelman's whining has trickled down to all the players and it's one of things I absolutely cannot stand about this team. It gets in the way of getting the job done when you get right down to it.
 
KingCookie said:
Phil doesn't coach OK teams. He coaches teams with at least one superstar on them. Taking this cut-and-paste Kings team on would be a first for him, I don't see it happening. Sure, offer him the job, what could it hurt? I highly doubt he'll take it despite what Ailene's unnamed mystery sources seem to think.

Adelman's whining has trickled down to all the players and it's one of things I absolutely cannot stand about this team. It gets in the way of getting the job done when you get right down to it.

So you're saying the Kings aren't talented enough for PJ since he's always coached great teams? That's not a bad argument. However, look at the competition for PJ's services: the Lakers, the Knicks, the Blazers, the Wolves, and maybe the Cavs. None of those teams made the playoffs and I think it's a good assumption to say the Kings still have more talent along with a more promising future than any of those teams. Compared to that list, Sactown suddenly isn't that bad of a option if the guy still wants to coach. The questions that remain are is this something the Maloofs and Petrie really want to do and is PJ willing to come to a talented playoff that is not yet a contender, or would he rather sit out some more and wait for future options?

As for if this is something Petrie and the Maloofs would do, I would have to say yes if Petrie really is the cold, blooded GM who would do anything to improve the team. I like Adelman, he's done a great job with this team, this may be his best job by getting this team to the playoffs. I resent people trying to blame the playoff loss on him. I also hate Poison, but she's not wrong about everything. The Kings would've won a title had the refs not jobbed them in game 6, had them made some free throws in game 7, and possibly if Webb's knee hadn't buckled in Dallas.

However, times change and changes are definately needed this summer. Adelman has always been a very offensive minded coach, but offense never wins in the end. The team defense is horrible. The team needs some defensive players and an overall defensive philosophy. Since the team is already in a rebuilding/retooling mode,there is no better time than now to make a run at Phil. Petrie could swing a few trades, take a look at KG (who knows); basically bring in some size and rebounding while keeping at least 2 of the big 3 in Mike, Peja, and Brad (preferably Mike stays at almost any cost).

I think it really could be one of the best things to happen to this franchise. Phil didn't get 9 rings by accident, he might be the missing element to help eventually put this team over the top.
 
DocHolliday said:
In response to one guy Keon Clark was a damn good player. Secondly I am not one of the normal Adelman bashers, but I did post in another thread that he coached the 4th quarter horribly by leaving Miller in the game.

Adelman is a good coach. Not many coaches would have been able to pull out a 50 win season with what he had to deal with this season. Blockbuster trades, and blockbuster injuries, but, there's always a but. He does not have the Killer instinct. If it's true that Phil Jackson would be interested in an available Sacramento Job, then I say go for him. People used to hate Kobe Bryant, Shaquille O' Neal and now Ray Allen for some people. I willing to bet though that most people wouldn't have minded if most of those people were on our team this year, except for he fact that Kobe is a selfish me me me player. The same would happen if Phil Jackson was the coach here. Initially there would be some people that would have the knee jerk reaction, HOW COULD YOU BRING HIM HERE, because of all the Laker past. Some would run through the streets laughin hysterically that we have a coach with killer instinct now. But, assuming we made some good personnel changes and he had a good team to work with, as soon as he showed some good strategies etc. everyone would say, "Hey he's not so bad. I don't really mind having him here.". It's how most fans are. You hate a guy, because he's good , and he hurts your favorite team. As soon as he plays for your team, he's the greatest thing.

You do realize that Miller is one of our three best players and had 11 assists right? He was setting good picks for Bibby in the high post and had the ability to knock down the open jumper and stretch the defense. You have to go with your best players in the end. Mike, Peja, and Brad had to ride this one out to the end. It was the right call. The Kings best shot at winning last night was with offense, not defense. That's the way the team had been all year. In this year of inconsistency, if there was one thing consistent about it's identity it's that they're an offensive team.
 
Back
Top