2 things the Kings should seriously consider

S

SK23

Guest
#31
Kings113 said:
Calm down, I said filler because of salary reasons for the trade to work. I dig Brad and what he brings, but if you've generally been following the NBA regularly since 04-05 season (or something like that), you'd know Pryzbilla has consistently been a beast. If that'd be a do-able trade, I'd ultimately do it, and so should the Kings.

http://www.hoopshype.com/players/joel_przybilla.htm

http://www.nba.com/playerfile/joel_przybilla/index.html
damn!! look at his bpg. He averages almost 3 bpg in just 25 minutes of playing time per game. Thats pretty crazy. And his rebounding is great!!! GP work your magic!
 
#32
I'd like to see that happen, Sirius. Get Brad back to being tougher than recently.

Indeed, SK23. And the hoopshype profile is likely outdated in an area or two.
 
Last edited:
Y

y2kings

Guest
#33
joel

did everyone NOT noticed when joel was averaging like 15+ rbs per game last year during a stretch in the season? defensively, he's probably the best center in the pacific division
 
#35
The best thing we could do IMO is find a way to trade up to the first pick in the draft and then take LaMarcus Aldridge. Gives us a PF/C who is athletic, solid on D, can take it to the post or hit an elbow jumper, high BB IQ. He does all of this at Texas, even with guards who are more interested in shooting jumpers instead of feeding him like they should. He has the potential to be a Garnett/Webber. Otherwise it is just too hard these days to acquire a young big without major questions about them, except through the top of the draft. There are other bigs lower down in the draft we could look at, but why not take a swing for the park and possibly set up a new Kings dynasty.

For those not familiar with him,http://draftexpress.com/viewprofile.php?p=55
 
#36
TheRaven said:
The best thing we could do IMO is find a way to trade up to the first pick in the draft and then take LaMarcus Aldridge. Gives us a PF/C who is athletic, solid on D, can take it to the post or hit an elbow jumper, high BB IQ. He does all of this at Texas, even with guards who are more interested in shooting jumpers instead of feeding him like they should. He has the potential to be a Garnett/Webber. Otherwise it is just too hard these days to acquire a young big without major questions about them, except through the top of the draft. There are other bigs lower down in the draft we could look at, but why not take a swing for the park and possibly set up a new Kings dynasty.

For those not familiar with him,http://draftexpress.com/viewprofile.php?p=55
If the Kings don't make the playoffs I'm selling my soul to the devil in exchange for the Kings winning the lottery and drafting Lamarcus Aldridge.
 

HndsmCelt

Hall of Famer
#37
nbrans said:
If the Kings don't make the playoffs I'm selling my soul to the devil in exchange for the Kings winning the lottery and drafting Lamarcus Aldridge.
I tried to sell my soul to the devil once, immagine my suprise when I found out he already held the option on it! :eek:
 
#38
Trade KT for a bag of peanut. j/k

Either KT or Reef have to go, prefer KT because Reef is simply a better player(except maybe rebound).

bibby/Wells/RA/Reef/Miller/ + Kmart/Gar/Skinner

Now we are talking about a playoff team here.
 
#40
Goo said:
Trade KT for a bag of peanut. j/k

Either KT or Reef have to go, prefer KT because Reef is simply a better player(except maybe rebound).

bibby/Wells/RA/Reef/Miller/ + Kmart/Gar/Skinner

Now we are talking about a playoff team here.

I agree, but assuming we'd get back a defensive big or 1 or 2 players, SAR should mostly be used off the bench then. That won't happen with Skinner here, who I think should start being started with the SAR/Brad situations. If it's Cato/Battie/Etan/Pryzbilla, probably happens (starts) with most of them.

Either way I'd be fine with SAR in the line-up once he gets those wires out, or coming off the bench.

sloter - No. ;)
 
Last edited:

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#45
Kings113 said:
Earl Watson/Tyronn Lue/Mike James? Sign me up for one

Skinner should definitely play more and regularly, as it should be all season.
Love to get James + thought about that as soon as Embry took over as Gm there + said he was willing to ship out anyone who didn't want to be there (James has grumbled some). Be a nice Bobby replacement, and if we also got that shotblocker up front, we could almost be complete.

Problems are that he is actually not that young (30 I think) -- not ahuge factor, but might slow down in a couple of years. And he is a FA this year. Would hate to trade for him and then lose him. Much might depend on whetehr he would rather start for a bad team or be the 6th man for a good one (we would obviously have to prove we'd make the moves to get good).
 
#46
Kings need a great/good defender at PF. Add that to Miller, Artest, Bonzi, and Bibby, and you have a scary team.

Rasheed Wallace (aside from the Artest/Sheed/Bonzi together angle) would be just absolutely perfect for this team. PJ Brown could work. I'm sure there are other guys, but those two come to mind as good fits.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#47
SoupIsGood said:
Kings need a great/good defender at PF. Add that to Miller, Artest, Bonzi, and Bibby, and you have a scary team.

Rasheed Wallace (aside from the Artest/Sheed/Bonzi together angle) would be just absolutely perfect for this team. PJ Brown could work. I'm sure there are other guys, but those two come to mind as good fits.
Same conclusion many of us have been coming too, but unfortunately the how/who question becomes tricky.


--Wallace is obviously unattainable (and doesn't rebound, which would be a significant problem). ONly guy oin that team we might be able to get would be Darko, who is obviously a gigantic wildcard.

--PJ is really old and would be a very short term solution if he was one at all. If SAR were here, might not even start despite our need. And he has also been said to be mysteriously unattainable as the Hornets are loading up trying to make a playoff push here.

--Evans is out there. Rugged, Rebounds. But not a great defender or the shotblocker we need.
--There were rumors Eddie Griffin might be available. I was interested in the offseason, now I'm not sure do you add his personality to a Bonzi/Artest core? And is he a great defender or just a numbers guy? Interesting though.
--Fortson's a thug, but too much so, and him + Bonzi and Artest = asking for it. Again woould have a hard time starting over SAR unless that was the trade. A bench guy now.
--Boozer's probably available if he ever returns to basketball. Combines the rebounding of Kenny with the post play of SAR, but plays no defnese, has an atitude, and a huge contract. Not to mention the injuries.
--Everybody wants Nene, but that's a move for next year even if you can get him (whihc appears difficult). And Nene is more post scorer than he is great defender/rebounder.
--Swift might be available again now, but only becuiase he's been a major disappointment in Houston. Blocks shots, but really not a very strurdy defender or rebounder, and lacks a brain stem.
--Etan Thomas might be available, but he's a bencher unless you trade SAR for him. + no offense.
--Gadzuric has been mentioend and I like him, but again likely a bencher, and a center more than PF. Also no offense (which I think is ok, but hard to sell Rick on).
--Chandler has been my choice -- tall, young, full of potential. We'd be scary if we had him I think. But he has a huge contract. Not much offense (which I'm ok with). And I have no idea if he is actually available for a team as short as the Bulls are without him.
--Then of course there's always the KG pipedream. ;) He and McHale were supposed to have some big argument last week, so strike while the iron is hot! :D
 
Last edited:

SacTownKid

Hall of Famer
#48
Uh, Bonzi and Sheed back together again?! Best leave that one alone.

I keep thinking how good Etan would be here. He actually looks like he could develop a semi-reliable jumper. He is also one of the most physical players in the league. He won't lead the league in blocked shots but he affects way more shots than he blocks, and he likes to stay near the basket and doesn't gamble on blocks too often.

Tyson would be awesome, but that contract makes it hard to figure out a way to get him here, and whether he is worth the gamble to begin with.

Another guy we don't mention is Greg Ostertag. I think he and Brad could have been a good combo. He is another guy that stays home and plays goalie instead of going for the glory of the dynamic block. Of course, he wouldn't see much time under Rick Adelman. Been there, didn't agree with it, and don't want to re-live it.
 
Last edited:

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#50
Kings113 said:
Brick, what do you think about Battie/Cato/Pryzbilla?
I have a hard time seeing Cato or Battie starting and making an impact for us. Would either guy really start over SAR? Thomas? Even Skinner would be right there.

I like Pryz, but he's a center. So then you would have to move Brad to PF for a very slow frontline, or trade Brad for Pryz...at which pont I am no longer such a big fan of the deal. Would be a beautiful backup to Brad though, although more of a combo 4/5 might be the way we'd go. Maybe.
 
#51
Bricklayer said:
Same conclusion many of us have been coming too, but unfortunately the how/who question becomes tricky.


--Wallace is obviously unattainable (and doesn't rebound, which would be a significant problem). ONly guy oin that team we might be able to get would be Darko, who is obviously a gigantic wildcard.

--PJ is really old and would be a very short term solution if he was one at all. If SAR were here, might not even start despite our need. And he has also been said to be mysteriously unattainable as the Hornets are loading up trying to make a playoff push here.

--Evans is out there. Rugged, Rebounds. But not a great defender or the shotblocker we need.
--There were rumors Eddie Griffin might be available. I was interested in the offseason, now I'm not sure do you add his personality to a Bonzi/Artest core? And is he a great defender or just a numbers guy? Interesting though.
--Fortson's a thug, but too much so, and him + Bonzi and Artest = asking for it. Again woould have a hard time starting over SAR unless that was the trade. A bench guy now.
--Boozer's probably available if he ever returns to basketball. Combines the rebounding of Kenny with the post play of SAR, but plays no defnese, has an atitude, and a huge contract. Not to mention the injuries.
--Everybody wants Nene, but that's a move for next year even if you can get him (whihc appears difficult). And Nene is more post scorer than he is great defender/rebounder.
--Swift might be available again now, but only becuiase he's been a major disappointment in Houston. Blocks shots, but really not a very strurdy defender or rebounder, and lacks a brain stem.
--Etan Thomas might be available, but he's a bencher unless you trade SAR for him. + no offense.
--Gadzuric has been mentioend and I like him, but again likely a bencher, and a center more than PF. Also no offense (which I think is ok, but hard to sell Rick on).
--Chandler has been my choice -- tall, young, full of potential. We'd be scary if we had him I think. But he has a huge contract. Not much offense (which I'm ok with). And I have no idea if he is actually available for a team as short as the Bulls are without him.
--Then of course there's always the KG pipedream. ;) He and McHale were supposed to have some big argument last week, so strike while the iron is hot! :D
Yikes, unless you guys get Tyson or Garnett ( :D ) I'm starting to think you should look in the draft for the big man. Everyone else that is available just won't make enough of a difference.

I do think Darko could eventually be a great fit in Sac, but he's not that rugged type of PF that you guys need right now...
 
#52
actually darko would be perfect....but im not sure sac has what detroit would want...i dont think detroit is gonna trade him unless someone is willing to vastly overpay....they might work out some sort of deal for arroyo/darko that includes sacs first rounder and garcia, but i just dont see the additional pieces that detroit would consider taking....but darko would be nirvana...
 
#53
SoupIsGood said:
Yikes, unless you guys get Tyson or Garnett ( :D ) I'm starting to think you should look in the draft for the big man. Everyone else that is available just won't make enough of a difference.

I do think Darko could eventually be a great fit in Sac, but he's not that rugged type of PF that you guys need right now...
I agree about the draft, we need to draft a big.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#55
ForlornKing said:
Aldridge...
Of course, but how to get him is the question. Unless we miss the playoffs and get real lucky in the lottery.

Anybody seen Tyrus Thomas play for LSU? Is apparently racing up the mock draft charts as a mega-athletic shotblocking/rebounding PF. But all I know are the numbers.
 
#56
foretaz said:
actually darko would be perfect....but im not sure sac has what detroit would want...i dont think detroit is gonna trade him unless someone is willing to vastly overpay....they might work out some sort of deal for arroyo/darko that includes sacs first rounder and garcia, but i just dont see the additional pieces that detroit would consider taking....but darko would be nirvana...
That;s the problem with Darko. Detroit doesn't really need him now, but then again Detroit doesn't need anything they might get offered for him either. Detroit pretty much doesn't need anything.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#57
bozzwell said:
That;s the problem with Darko. Detroit doesn't really need him now, but then again Detroit doesn't need anything they might get offered for him either. Detroit pretty much doesn't need anything.
I think they need Jason Hart. :D
 
#59
bozzwell said:
That;s the problem with Darko. Detroit doesn't really need him now, but then again Detroit doesn't need anything they might get offered for him either. Detroit pretty much doesn't need anything.
detroit could use a backup pg better than arroyo, possibly a good young swingman(garcia), draft picks and capspace as they have to pay some big money in the upcoming years....

unfortunately the kings dont have a solid backup pg, their draft picks dont appear to be very good, and they have no real expiring contracts of note...so outside of garcia, not alot to offer...

just a tough match...have to involve a 3rd team...but most teams would probably love to have darko for themselves.....so....
 

SacTownKid

Hall of Famer
#60
I don't think Detroit will be able to even keep Darko in a few years when his deal is up. He'll leave them high and dry.

I don't know much about Darko, pretty much nobody does. I have heard anything and everything about this dude. How this guy either sucks, or he will be KG in a few years.