[Game] 06/82: Kings @ Bucks 01 NOV 2025, 2pm PT/5pm ET

The Kings have 16 games in November. How many will they win?


  • Total voters
    34
  • Poll closed .
With the "proximate foul" exception on the out-of-bounds reviews, why not challenge the previous foul by Giannis on Domas on the same grounds?
 
I feel like it's hard to make the case that they've been doing "exceedingly" well with Monk.
Take a look at the numbers I posted the other day.

 
This should be interesting. Rivers kind of paced out his rotation whereas Christie really rode DeMar in that half.
This is usually when the other team makes an adjustment and the Kings just fall apart. I’m expecting them to try to make someone other than DeRozan or LaVine score.
 
This is usually when the other team makes an adjustment and the Kings just fall apart. I’m expecting them to try to make someone other than DeRozan or LaVine score.

The Bucks have Giannis but the Kings might actually have the advantage if DeMar and LaVine both continue to dominate like this.
 
I promised hrdboild that I would watch Zach LaVine "every second" in the next game. Here is my report on the pluses and minuses of his play in the first half:

1) He has 18 points, shooting 5-8 from the field and 3-5 from deep, with 3 rebounds, 2 assists, and 0 turnovers.

2) I did not see him dog on defense on a single play, but he only played 94 feet on one play, no doubt on coach's instructions. He missed three close-outs on three-point shots, all good, by being a little bit late and not getting a hand in the shooter's face. A little greater court awareness would lead to faster reaction times. Giannis beat him off the dribble and also blew by him on the fast break.

3) He does not set screens, a general failing by this year's edition of the Kings. But you would expect more from a veteran.

4) LaVine was the only King to score in the first 3 1/2 minutes of the game. He also hit a clutch three at the end of the half to tie the game.
 
I promised hrdboild that I would watch Zach LaVine "every second" in the next game. Here is my report on the pluses and minuses of his play in the first half:

1) He has 18 points, shooting 5-8 from the field and 3-5 from deep, with 3 rebounds, 2 assists, and 0 turnovers.

2) I did not see him dog on defense on a single play, but he only played 94 feet on one play, no doubt on coach's instructions. He missed three close-outs on three-point shots, all good, by being a little bit late and not getting a hand in the shooter's face. A little greater court awareness would lead to faster reaction times. Giannis beat him off the dribble and also blew by him on the fast break.

3) He does not set screens, a general failing by this year's edition of the Kings. But you would expect more from a veteran.

4) LaVine was the only King to score in the first 3 1/2 minutes of the game. He also hit a clutch three at the end of the half to tie the game.

Keep watching him closely
 
I promised hrdboild that I would watch Zach LaVine "every second" in the next game. Here is my report on the pluses and minuses of his play in the first half:

1) He has 18 points, shooting 5-8 from the field and 3-5 from deep, with 3 rebounds, 2 assists, and 0 turnovers.

2) I did not see him dog on defense on a single play, but he only played 94 feet on one play, no doubt on coach's instructions. He missed three close-outs on three-point shots, all good, by being a little bit late and not getting a hand in the shooter's face. A little greater court awareness would lead to faster reaction times. Giannis beat him off the dribble and also blew by him on the fast break.

3) He does not set screens, a general failing by this year's edition of the Kings. But you would expect more from a veteran.

4) LaVine was the only King to score in the first 3 1/2 minutes of the game. He also hit a clutch three at the end of the half to tie the game.

I appreciate you following through on this. Keep watching what happens the rest of the half. As usual he's doing a terrific job of making sure he's not involved in the defensive play unless someone is going right at him.
 
Take a look at the numbers I posted the other day.

That is a very micro-view way of looking at things. I will stipulate that it is true for whatever that's worth (which isn't a ton, in my Personal Record Book™). My overall point is that no team that is 1-4 is doing anything exceedingly well.
 
It could also mean they just don’t like each other, Kayte.

It doesn’t always mean they are holding each other accountable and lifting each other up. Just as likely blaming each other
 
Back
Top