You are saying you believe in praising and criticizing players on their actual performance.
Tetsujin said "Listening. Quick shot off the dribble from the perimeter with twenty seconds on the clock is not a smart play.: And nickmcclure posted "Gary Gerould said Omri forced a few shots". Both posts based on actual performance and in a nice way because it does not have that "selfish" word/label.
So, what's wrong with those posts if what they are saying are based on actual performance?
Please don't over-react. All the players of Kings gets the same treatment as Casspi in this board. Hawes, JT, Greene, Garcia, Udrih, Cousins, etc. and even Evans had their infamous moments in this board. They all get criticized and get praises when it is due.
IMO, everything is normal --> unless, you think Casspi is entitled to be extra-special and immune from criticisms in this board?
Is that how you want people in this board to treat Casspi, someone extra-special and above the rest of the team?
If YES, why?
I guess I need to repeat myself several times to be understood her, so here goes:
I do not have a problem with people criticizing Casspi. I have criticized him myself and will continue to do so if he deserves it.
I do not have a problem with people criticizing Casspi. I have criticized him myself and will continue to do so if he deserves it.
I do not have a problem with people criticizing Casspi. I have criticized him myself and will continue to do so if he deserves it.
I do not have a problem with people criticizing Casspi. I have criticized him myself and will continue to do so if he deserves it.
Next point:
I do have a problem when any player is criticized, or praised for that matter, in a systematic manner, just to prove a preconceived notion.
I do have a problem when any player is criticized, or praised for that matter, in a systematic manner, just to prove a preconceived notion.
I do have a problem when any player is criticized, or praised for that matter, in a systematic manner, just to prove a preconceived notion.
I do have a problem when any player is criticized, or praised for that matter, in a systematic manner, just to prove a preconceived notion.
And as for your other point. All players absolutely do NOT receive the same treatment on this board. I think Hawes, for example, received shamefully disrespectful treatment here, and so did Noc. Last year I actually thought that this board was a little too easy on Omri, when he deserved much harsher criticism. The only time I thought he was treated unfairly here was when some people got so overly obsessed with Tyreke's stats that they actually blamed Omri for intentionally "stealing" a rebound from Tyreke to sabotage his chances of a triple double. That was the only time last year that I felt that I need to stand up to him and call these posters out on the unfair criticism. For some reason, that attitude has returned in the last couple of days, perhaps sparked by some people who are rooting for Donte in the race for the SF starting job, so I'm calling those people out again.
And just to make it clear, I don't have a horse in the SF race. I like Donte and I agree with the point some people made that he might be a better fit with the other starters than Omri. I just think that you don't need to constantly look for reasons to knock Omri just because you want to make a point.