Welcome Devin Carter
- Thread starter Tetsujin
- Start date
I’m not sure but it might be due to the way they count free throws 1 make is worth two (instead of taking two shots) until the end of games. So my guess is he had 6 trips to the line for a total of 13 points (one being a foul on a three.) I’m not sure on this though. Their individual point total add up to 120 so I think the 34 is correct.
Edit: so I went through the play by play. He had 2 trips to the line on fouled threes (6 points) one technical foul free throw (1 point) and 3 two point shots he was fouled on (6 points) for a total of 13 points at the line.
Edit: so I went through the play by play. He had 2 trips to the line on fouled threes (6 points) one technical foul free throw (1 point) and 3 two point shots he was fouled on (6 points) for a total of 13 points at the line.
Last edited:
We are a long ways away from this even being a thing but I do dream of this lineup in the future:
Carter
Keon
Lavine
Keegan
Sabonis
Defensively that lineup could be sick. Theoretically you would have 3 plus defenders, 5 capable shooters, 3 plus rebounders. ISO scoring would not be a strength. Keegan would have to be a 16-19 a game kinda guy. Carter would have to take a huge leap. But that could be fun. Monk back to big time scorer off the bench.
I’m excited to watch the development of Dev
Carter
Keon
Lavine
Keegan
Sabonis
Defensively that lineup could be sick. Theoretically you would have 3 plus defenders, 5 capable shooters, 3 plus rebounders. ISO scoring would not be a strength. Keegan would have to be a 16-19 a game kinda guy. Carter would have to take a huge leap. But that could be fun. Monk back to big time scorer off the bench.
I’m excited to watch the development of Dev
Not that I hate this as an eventual lineup, but this implies that both Monk and DeRozan have moved on, and unless we're going to propose that they moved on in free agency, we ought to have gotten some good assets for them, and one of the Carter/Keon/Murray slots in the rotation would hopefully be filled with an even better player.
Difficult to do, but "CAN'T" might be an absolute that can be overcome. Christie has it in him, perhaps the administration would allow it. Starting at point guard doesn't really play to Monk's greatest strengths given who else is starting...and Monk seems to know it. He might be able to be convinced that the 6th man role would benefit the team...ego aside. Rather than seeing it as a demotion, it could be presented as an adjustment to showcase his unique abilities.
Then there is always the, "rotate him out at the first opportunity" (foul or time out) to make a point tactic. He would de facto start, but realistically be the 6th man where he can add so much more to the team, as he has amply demonstrated. There is much more opportunity and expectation to be the "freewheeling" Monk in that role.
Then there is always the, "rotate him out at the first opportunity" (foul or time out) to make a point tactic. He would de facto start, but realistically be the 6th man where he can add so much more to the team, as he has amply demonstrated. There is much more opportunity and expectation to be the "freewheeling" Monk in that role.
If we moved Monk to the bench for Fultz, I'm 99% sure that he would actively revolt. Like, Monk firebombing G1C would not be out of the realm of possibility (OK, maybe a little beyond the realm, but you get my point). So, like, you can do it, but the consequences of doing so will almost certainly be worse than the benefits.
Monk's best role in fact has been as a 6th man spark plug, but I am quite certain that Monk does not believe that, and that's what matters.
Monk's best role in fact has been as a 6th man spark plug, but I am quite certain that Monk does not believe that, and that's what matters.
It’s definitely a big question. On the flip side, he did re-sign with the kings over other teams he could have allegedly started for (may or may not be true). Mike Brown always said bench guys should want to start or play more minutes. It probably comes down to winning. If we are a 50 plus win team he is probably ok with the role. A .500 squad is a different story.
Yeah. At the same time, he resigned here where his initial position WAS as the 6th man. He was not the starter in camp. That coach is no long here.
I don't want to feel like we are dissing Monk , or any of these guys. Monk's gone to bat for this city, even after he got back-stabbed by his friend.
But what needs to matter is wins; and I'm very confident that longterm, that means Keon and/or Devin Carters defense needs to be in the starting lineup.
I don't want to feel like we are dissing Monk , or any of these guys. Monk's gone to bat for this city, even after he got back-stabbed by his friend.
But what needs to matter is wins; and I'm very confident that longterm, that means Keon and/or Devin Carters defense needs to be in the starting lineup.
That's the thing. He proved it! Dude signed his generational wealth contract. We want him to be a competitor and want to start, but he's not longer having to "prove" anything in this league anymore. He's an awesome player, whether that's starting or off the bench.
I just hope this offseason, someone puts the hand up and takes the leadership to come off the bench.
I just hope this offseason, someone puts the hand up and takes the leadership to come off the bench.
Yeh that’s what I was saying, he signed knowing he was a reserve. He made his feelings about being a starter known last year- not happy with it but accepts it for the betterment of the team. I don’t think he would be happy going back to the bench but would do it if the team has success. If we don’t, I’d imagine he asks for a trade.
I agree. Let's pump the brakes a bit. If Fultz can be a starting PG, he can just as easily bring those skills off the bench. Monk has more than paid his dues here and he not only deserves to be starting but is very effective with that unit. Fultz is a great pickup, let's let it be that. Let's let Fultz make us that super deep team, not Monk.
I am open to seeing Fultz as he progresses and I know it’s early but he has only played a handful of games this season after his rehab. We have him on the cheap and I see why they took a flyer on him as the upside could be very good.
As far as Carter goes he is where he belongs and with learning our system and getting good coaching plus lots of playing time.
We are trying to make the playoffs and I believe DC is going to ride the players we have on the main roster. That doesn’t mean he won’t get time on the court in Sacramento in spots.
As far as Carter goes he is where he belongs and with learning our system and getting good coaching plus lots of playing time.
We are trying to make the playoffs and I believe DC is going to ride the players we have on the main roster. That doesn’t mean he won’t get time on the court in Sacramento in spots.
If the team looks to need defense and a coach doesn't make that decision while potentially costing games, it'll cost him his job. Monk starting or not might not be the question but the minutes and down the stretch play may very well. Monk is a good player, but having someone like him be a starter on a team usually entirely depends on the team around him. It's like with Cuz back in the day, Monk guarding the front door and Domas guarding the back is going to be a tough road to overcome at some point.
It's way too early but as of now Fultz has an assist percentage of 9%. His most needed ability looks to be his ability to break the defense down and he's looked pretty good doing it. If DC is looking for the assist guy out of the options, Carter is apparently already it. He's 3rd in assist percentage of qualified players on the team and has an assist to turnover ratio higher than Monk or Fox this year. Far less chances for turnovers though so that's probably not guaranteed.
Looked like he was going against a high school player