so if we effectively traded Davion, HB, Huerter, Sasha, 45th overall, and the Portland pick, and whatever else other draft capital it would take for Ingram (guy’s on an expiring so I’d assume a draft pick package similar to what the Pacers gave up for Pascal) and McDaniels, would that be a successful trade in everyone’s eyes?
I’m fine with it. The idea of stacking depth beyond 8-9 guys just kills you long term. You only have 240 minutes each game, and most good teams aren’t reliably playing more than 9 guys. To be investing huge resources beyond those 9 guys is counterproductive.
To me, the ideal roster construction is 4 main guys earning about 120 minutes per game (roughly 30 each) and 5 secondary guys earning the other 120 minutes (roughly 24 each, give or take). Then you add a small contract gunner/momentum changer who may or may not play (think Terrance Davis), 2-3 vet minimum/culture guys who know they are only going to play if injury/foul trouble, preferably a PG, center, and wing (think guys like Delly, Len, McGee, Brewer) and 2-3 young development guys on small deals.
HB and Huerter seem like Tier 2 guys, miscast and mispaid as Tier 1 guys. If you can consolidate them for a Tier 1 guy you do it. Sasha could be a Tier 2 type guy if he plays better, but you don’t need him and Lyles. Davion might be a tier 2 guy but Carter seems the better prospect.
Before the trade, you had
Tier 1- Fox, Domas, Keegan
Tier 2 - HB, Huerter, Monk, Keon, Lyles, Davion, Sasha, Carter
If (and a big if) you can consolidate some of the Tier 2 guys into Tier 1 that makes way more sense from a roster build perspective.
Tier 1 - Fox, Domas, Keegan, Ingram
Tier 2- Monk, Keon, Carter, Lyles, free agent wing
young guys- Colby, Crawford, Jones, Boogie Ellis, Slawson.
Sign a couple vet min guys. the only downside to me is losing the Portland pick. Outside of Colby and Crawford we are a little weak in the young development guys, but overall I’m much happier with the structure of roster 2.