Was thinking about top 5 dynasties the other night. Since I was born in 78’ am only going off of what I personally watched but would rank them like this …
1. 90s Bulls
2. 80s Lakers
3. 80’s Celtics
4. 90’s/2000s Spurs
5. Tie of these Ws and the 2000s 3 peat Lakers (not sure I can include post Shaq Lakers)
What’s funny/sad is that the Kings should have had 2 titles, and good chance at 3, during that 2001-2004 span, which would have knocked the lakers out of this .
Well, I'd agree to at least one. I think most would, even objective non-KINGS fans.
I can't really justify any others, though. Injuries happen and once C-Webb went down, that was it for the KINGS run.
Circling back to your list and the time frame you outlined, I fully agree that the Bulls HAVE to be #1 on the list. It's not even close.
6 titles in 8 seasons, and the only gap in between involved MJ playing baseball for a year and missing almost 2 seasons of basketball. He only played 17 games the season he returned.
Who knows whether they could have actually won 8 consecutive had he not taken the time off, but I sure would have liked there chances. Maybe they win 7 in 8 seasons? Who knows??
Regardless, winning 6 in 8 in utterly ridiculous. Only the mighty Celtics of the 50's and 60's can boast better.