Yeah, that's my take. I think Murray is a solid B, but letting those 2 picks go with some legit 1st round level talent like Keels and Liddell knocks it down a bit. No C+ so B.
Yeah, 77-78% seems right currently. I'd bump to like an 85 if Vezenkov came over this season.
Didn't screw up the 4th pick and get cute. Keegan was my #4 prospect and the Kings finally invested in a wing talent with shooting and defensive potential. It's been such an eye sore for this roster for so long, it's nice we finally recognize the importance of upper-tier wing talent.
Keon Ellis was a favorite of Kings twitter and looks the part of a pretty great perimeter defender with an excellent C&S shot. He's got to put on weight to make it imo, but he has really valuable NBA skills to be a rotation guy down the line. Maybe like a Danny Green type if he can add 15-20 pounds? Good UDFA investment and I think a lot of people would have been happy with him at one the 2nd rounders.
It sounds like Sasha Vezenkov wasn't just a throw in for cash, but Monte actually pursued his rights. 6'9 wing at the 4 with a good looking shot and an impressive EuroLeague resume the last 2 seasons. I think reading the tea leaves is we'll try and bring him over next season when we have a bunch of open roster spots and invest in him then. If he comes over, I think a pretty good use of the pick with his success in EuroLeague and how much the big wing shooter archetype plays over here in the NBA.
The other guy we signed, Jeriah Horne (looks more like a summer league deal at this point, not a ton of clarity) at 6'7 with an excellent shooting stroke. Very clearly Monte prioritized wing size, shooting and defense. The archetype bets overall were very good
The elephant in the room is passing on the talent sitting there at 37. Really does feel like we're going to get Gary Trent'd by someone available at that slot. Hardy/Liddell (favorite of a lot of people here and a 1st round talent for most)/Keels/Brown/McGowens. Literally like 5 or 6 guys I think you could have drafted top 25 and no one would look at you funny were available. And what's annoying is I think we punted for 2 pretty mediocre 2nd round picks (24 and 28 from the Mavs? Come on....) because we didn't want to be in a position where we had to DFA one of the expirings and eat that money. It was an opportunity for a bad team to get a good young prospect and we whiffed.
Overall, a good draft, made good archetype bets, but could have been a home-run, even without trades if you just draft someone there at 37.