KINGS PICKING 4TH IN 2022 NBA DRAFT!
- Thread starter Tetsujin
- Start date
- Status
The chance of getting a star in the top 5 picks is statistically higher than any other set of picks. U have to go for a star or get paid handsomly to let someone else get the opp to draft a star. It would be pure incompetence if McNair takes a high floor fit at 4.
And I really wish people would stop comparing Murray to Hali. Hali made others better. Murray is going to be in the corner, shooting threes. He succeeds only if Fox decides to prioritize winning over forcing everyone else to play his game.
And I really wish people would stop comparing Murray to Hali. Hali made others better. Murray is going to be in the corner, shooting threes. He succeeds only if Fox decides to prioritize winning over forcing everyone else to play his game.
they are not comparable in playing style, no one said that. They are comparable for the reasons I listed.
it’s also statistically likely that the consensus is wrong, Overwhelmingly so.
if someone says Mathurin or Daniels or Murray will be one of the best 4 players in the draft it isn’t laughable or Kangz just because Sam Vecenie says so
it’s also statistically likely that the consensus is wrong, Overwhelmingly so.
if someone says Mathurin or Daniels or Murray will be one of the best 4 players in the draft it isn’t laughable or Kangz just because Sam Vecenie says so
I don’t really care about consensus when it comes to who i would take. I don’t think Ivey is bpa at 4 either, but if others think so, McNair has a duty to squeeze assets from others, who want to come up and grab him at 4. It’s like charting n stock trading. Charting is pure behavioralism. Doesn’t reveal jack sh*t about the company, but if the entire world is looking at the same charts, u might as well lever that bcz theyre going to make moves off those charts. If the world thinks this a 4 person draft, squeeze da sh*t outta that #4 spot.
As for Murrary, i like him. But he just never popped when i watched him prob around 10 times last yr.
As for Murrary, i like him. But he just never popped when i watched him prob around 10 times last yr.
Murray didn't pop for me either but his stats by the end of the game did. I found myself rewinding the game against the Rutgers in the tournament because I couldn't figure out where the 26pts came from. That was with him missing all his 3 pointers as well. I just don't know if his bread and butter is going to translate to the NBA. It sure didn't with Bagley but Bagley had less moves and got by more on his athleticism and size.
Ham got laughed at by comparing Murray to Marvin Williams but it's a real possibility that the NBA version of Murray is a lot like Marvin Williams if his 2PT game doesn't translate to the next level. If it does translate, then he could be a better version of Barnes with a slightly worse 3pt shot and better defense but if it doesn't translate, he may be regulated to standing outside the arc waiting for someone to drive and kick.
Ham got laughed at by comparing Murray to Marvin Williams but it's a real possibility that the NBA version of Murray is a lot like Marvin Williams if his 2PT game doesn't translate to the next level. If it does translate, then he could be a better version of Barnes with a slightly worse 3pt shot and better defense but if it doesn't translate, he may be regulated to standing outside the arc waiting for someone to drive and kick.
- Status