So you tout Ball and Haliburton as alright because they can run an offense, and have size. Does that mean you think that Lewis can't run an offense? Maybe you should actually watch the games instead of what mock drafts say. Lewis is a very good player and he happens to be 6'3" with a good wingspan, so he's not a midget. He shoots the three well, and I see no reason he couldn't play along side Fox as well as be his backup. I thought you were the guy that liked 3pt shooters. Maybe I'm mistaken, but if so, then I don't think Okoro fits that analogy. I like him but my biggest reservation is his poor three pt shooting.
You mention that this is a weak draft, and your right in the sense that there's no clear cut group of players at the top that anyone feels confident about becoming stars. However, the draft is deep in players that could become solid rotational bench players, or starters in the NBA. And that goes all the way into the 2nd round. I see Lewis as potential starter material, and if so, that could become a problem down the road, but at least he would be an asset. My first choice is still Bey unless someone I really like falls, but I would be fine with Lewis who I think is a dynamic player and fun to watch.
I used to have a personal rule to not read any mock drafts during the college season so as not to be influenced by them. Over the years I've come to realize that a large percentage of them have no idea what the hell their talking about. There are certain people I respect but they are few and far between. Many mocks are made up of second hand or even third hand info. Bottom line is, my opinions are my own, and take them for what you paid for them. My advice to anyone looking at players is to look for what they can do, not what they can't do. If they have a special talent like Okoro, Highlight it, and then later balance it against what he can't do.
One exceptional talent can give you a long career in the NBA. If your looking for the perfect player, then your in the wrong business. I find most mocks reaction to Haliburton amusing. Its as though they can't believe he's as good as he is. They can't find any obvious flaws, but for some reason they can't make themselves consider him as the best player in the draft. And, right now, he is! I guess he doesn't fit their image of what they think the best player should look like. If I were the Warriors, I would take Haliburton with the 2nd pick. If not him, then definitely Wiseman.